[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Sat Jan 19 09:24:57 CST 2019
January 19
SAUDI ARABIA:
Secretive Khashoggi Murder Trial Begins in Saudi Arabia, Five Face Death
Penalty
The trial of 11 people accused of being involved in the murder of Jamal
Khashoggi has begun in the Saudi Arabian capital, Riyadh, state media report,
with 5 of the defendants facing execution. Prosecutors asked for the death
penalty for the 5 during the 1st court hearing in the Khashoggi case Thursday,
saying the journalist was murdered in a “rogue” operation by agents sent to
persuade him to return to the kingdom. Scant information was released by state
media—no names of the defendants have been officially released. Saudi Arabia
has refused Turkey’s request to extradite 18 suspects for trial, including a
hit squad of 15 alleged agents who Turkey alleges flew to Istanbul to carry out
the killing. Khashoggi, a prominent U.S.-based critic of the Saudi royal
family, was killed after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October of
last year.
(source: thedaioybeast.com)
JAPAN:
The toll of 50 years on death row
Every day, in any weather, 82-year-old Iwao Hakamada walks around the small
Japanese city of Hamamatsu for up to 6 hours. A volunteer follows a few steps
behind to be sure he doesn't get hurt and can find his way home.
Hakamada suffers from a mental condition diagnosed as "prison psychosis," the
result of spending nearly 5 decades on death row — thought to be the world
record — for a quadruple murder that evidence suggests he did not commit.
In 1966, he was a 30-year-old former professional boxer working at a miso
factory, when the manager, along with his wife and 2 children, were found
stabbed to death in their home, which was then set on fire. Hakamada lived
on-site and was the only suspect. No one could corroborate his alibi that he'd
been in his dorm room and rushed to the fire to help put it out.
Police detained him for about three weeks and according to records from the
detention center, interrogated him for up to 14 hours a day. He alleged they
beat him with nightsticks, pricked him with pins to keep him awake and denied
him adequate food and water until finally he confessed. He later retracted the
confession in court.
"It's striking, almost stunning, how long the interrogations went. Day after
day after day, before finally on day 20, Hakamada confessed," said David
Johnson, professor of sociology and an expert on the Japanese justice system at
the University of Hawaii. He said false confessions are a major source of
wrongful convictions in Japan.
Overall, Japan's conviction rate is above 99 percent, meaning almost every
criminal case that goes to trial ends in conviction. In part, that's because
prosecutors only bring cases they think they can win, said Johnson, and many of
those cases are built on confessions.
Hakamada was imprisoned for 48 years — 30 of them in solitary confinement.
Every morning, he awoke at 7 a.m. to find out whether that would be the day he
would die by hanging. Japan does not give prisoners advance warning of their
executions.
The U.S. and Japan are the only G7 countries that still have capital
punishment. The UNHRC has urged Japan to consider abolishing it, pointing to
the large number of crimes that can carry a death sentence, the lack of pardons
and the execution of elderly and mentally ill convicts.
For Hakamada, decades of living in existential limbo took a toll on his mental
health. His decline can be charted in the letters he wrote his family that his
sister Hideko keeps in a box at her house, where he now lives.
The earliest letters from the 1960s, are written in neat rows of Japanese
characters and filled with hope.
"The report about the first trial showed evidence was faked and the court
misinterpreted the facts, so I truly believe there will be a retrial and I'll
be cleared," one reads. "I'm doing okay, so don't worry."
Then in 1980, after 12 years of appeals, the Supreme Court upheld his death
sentence. Hideko says that was a turning point for her brother.
"Not long after that, he told me the man in the cell next to his had been taken
away and on the way out, he said, 'so long, hope you stay well,' then never
came back. And that was when the death penalty became real to him, and it was
very scary."
His letters from that time show his mind starting to unravel; he writes about
devils tormenting him in the shower.
"I could tell he was getting seriously mentally ill," said Hideko. "So I
visited every month, but sometimes he refused to see me. I kept going though,
to tell him his family hadn't abandoned him."
Then nearly 50 years after he was first imprisoned, Hideko filed for a retrial
based on new DNA evidence: Hakamada's lawyers said his blood did not match
blood from the crime scene.
A district court granted the retrial in 2014, writing it was "possible that key
evidence had been fabricated by investigators" and that it was "unjust to
detain him because of the clear possibility he was innocent." Hakamada was
released to his sister.
"I remember that day so clearly. I was 81 and I smiled for the 1st time since I
was 33," Hideko said. "It was like I became myself again."
It was also a joyful day for a judge in the original case. Norimichi Kumamoto
was chief of the 3-judge tribunal that heard Hakamada's case in 1968. He later
said he believed Hakamada was innocent but couldn't convince the other 2
judges. Still, as head of the panel, he had to write the death sentence. He
said the look on Hakamada's face when he heard the sentence haunted him. So he
quit the bench a few months later, became estranged from his family and
wandered the country.
When Hakamada was released, Kumamoto met him to apologize. The judge was so
frail he couldn't speak but Hideko still thinks the visit meant something to
her brother.
That is not the end of the story, though. Because in Japan, prosecutors can
appeal rulings and this past June, the Tokyo High Court overturned the decision
that set Hakamada free.
The case now goes to the Supreme Court. If Hakamada loses his appeal, he could
be sent back to death row.
"Obviously it's a tragedy for him if he goes back to death row after being
released," said attorney Kiyomi Tsunogae, a member of Hakamada's defense team.
"But it's also a tragedy for this country. I don't know any other nation that
has done this. They don't want to admit that they fabricated the evidence and
made a mistake 50 years ago."
Tsunoga said judges are political appointees and can sometimes be more
concerned with satisfying the government than administering justice.
Still, there were concerns about how the DNA evidence was handled — the expert
witness failed to keep records, for example. Despite that, Johnson at the
University of Hawaii said he thinks the court made the wrong decision and
Hakamada should have been granted a retrial.
"I believe he's actually innocent but I can't be 100 % sure of it," said
Johnson.
Johnson said it's possible Hakamada could be sent back to death row but then
granted executive clemency, and that it could actually increase public support
for the death penalty because the government would be seen as acting
mercifully.
For now, the court has allowed Hakamada to remain free on bail at his sister's
house and a community group formed to help care for him. Every day, a volunteer
named Ino drives over an hour from her house to cook lunch and make sure there
is always someone to accompany him on his walks.
Hakamada himself doesn't seem to fully grasp his situation but remains upbeat.
"I feel good, I'm healthy," he said. "The world is developing and becoming a
good world — the companies tell you, you can make a lot of money and the
authorities don't punish you anymore."
His sister just listens and doesn't push him to talk about his time in prison.
"Even death row inmates, they're not animals. They're still human and they
should be treated with humanity — so I do think Japan should get rid of the
death penalty," she said. "As for my brother, of course, I'd like the Supreme
Court to say he's innocent but if he gets to stay out of prison, that's better
than nothing."
(source: theweek.com)
********************************
A former death row inmate who was acquitted 30 years ago in a retrial has
expressed concerns about an 82-year-old former boxer and death row inmate who
is seeking a retrial.
"I'm worried about him," Masao Akahori, 89, said of Iwao Hakamada who was
released in 2014 after a district court decided to open a retrial of his case.
A high court subsequently scrapped the decision and Hakamada is appealing to
the Supreme Court.
Akahori still harbors a sense of distrust toward the judicial authority that
falsely convicted him over a 1954 murder case.
The resident of the central Japan city of Nagoya complained, "Police wouldn't
listen to whatever I said." He often reads books about cases in which innocent
people were falsely convicted, say his supporters.
Akahori visited his hometown Shimada in the central Japan prefecture of
Shizuoka on Jan. 13 to pay his respects at his family grave.
On that night, he dined with his supporters in Shimada. "I was really glad,"
Akahori said as he remembered his release after being acquitted by the Shizuoka
District Court on Jan. 31, 1989. A smiling Akahori added that the past 30 years
"passed like a flash."
4 death row inmates, including Akahori, have been acquitted since the Supreme
Court released the criteria for opening retrials of convicts in 1975.
Akahori asked a Hakamada supporter who was present at the dinner meeting if
Hakamada was doing well.
Since his own acquittal, Akahori has been involved in activities to support
those who were convicted and are demanding that their cases be retried.
He has also appealed for the abolition of the death penalty. In a lecture
meeting, he said he "felt frightened every morning about the possibility of
being sent to the execution chamber."
In 2012, Akahori was selected as a candidate for a lay judge but he declined
the offer saying, "I distrust the judicial system."
Akahori now lives at a nursing care facility for the aged in Nagoya. He
occasionally goes out with his supporters and enjoys karaoke.
His doctor has told him that he is in good shape saying, "You can live to be
100."
Naoko Shimaya, a supporter for Akahori, expressed hope that he will remain
healthy and demanded that the judicial authority prevent false convictions.
"For Mr. Akahori, the Heisei era is the 30 years after his release, when he was
free. I hope he'll continue to be fine. Relevant authorities should stick to
the principle of the benefit of the doubt to prevent false convictions," she
said.
(source: The Mainichi)
NIGERIA:
8 Sentenced To Death By Hanging For Armed Robbery In Adamawa
An Adamawa High Court has sentenced 8 armed robbers to death by hanging.
The 8 condemned persons were found guilty on 9-count charges according to the
presiding judge, Justice Abdulaziz Waziri.
Justice Waziri, while sentencing the accused persons, said the judgment
followed a thorough review of the statements of both the prosecution and
defence counsel in the matter.
He said the presentations of the counsel and those of witnesses proved beyond
any doubt that the suspects were guilty of the charges of armed robbery brought
against them.
He, therefore, pronounced the capital punishment of death by hanging on them
but explained that they had 90 days to appeal against the judgment.
The convicted 8 included Aliyu Ardo, Sadiq Mijinyawa, Shaibu Abubakar, and Sani
Musa; the others were Kabiru Abdullahi, Saidu Abubakar, Umar Mohammed, and
Sanusi Ibrahim.
Armed robbery and kidnapping for ransom are on the increase in Adamawa
following the displacement of people from their homes by insurgency and the
recent farmers/herders clashes that have ravaged north-eastern Nigeria over the
years.
(source: Africa Independent Television)
MOROCCO:
Justice Minister: Morocco is Taking Steps Toward Ending Death
Penalty----Moroccan activists are still calling for the abolition of the death
penalty, a decision that may not be so far-fetched.
The Moroccan Coalition Against the Death Penalty has reiterated its call to the
government to remove the death penalty from the country’s Penal Code.
During a meeting with his general assembly on Friday in Rabat in the presence
of justice minister Mohamed Aujjar, the coalition’s coordinator, Abderrahim El
Jamii, stressed the need to“fight” for human rights and abolish the death
penalty.
El Jamii urged Aujjar to join the Moroccans calling for abolition, while
emphasizing that the minister’s attendance at the meeting gave hope and opened
a new “political and human rights chapter.”
El Jamii, on behalf of the coalition, pointed out the incompatibility between
Article 20 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life to all human
beings and the Penal Code, which allows the death penalty.
Although still an option, Morocco has maintained a de facto moratorium on the
death penalty since 1993.
The new president of the National Council of Human Rights (CNDH), Amina
Bouayach, strongly criticized the government’s “indecisiveness” towards
abolishing the death penalty.
She said that “there is a big hesitation” on the state’s part to abolish the
penalty and called for “a national dialogue” to make a final decision.
Morocco had six chances prior to 2018 to join the UN moratorium banning the
practice, but each time the country chose to abstain from the vote, adding to
activists’ frustration.
For his part, Aujjar revealed that the state is gradually showing an
inclinations toward ending the death penalty.
“Morocco is not far from joining the growing global initiatives to abolish the
death penalty,” he stated.
Calls for the death penalty for Imlil murder suspects
Ahmed Chaouki Benyoub, the minister delegate at the National Council of Human
Rights, drew attention to the case of the murder of 2 Scandinavian tourists in
Morocco in December.
Benyoub said that in the wake of the terror attack against the tourists, very
few people would be against giving the murderers the death penalty, if the
government were to take an opinion poll.
However, Benyoub expressed his readiness for inclusive dialogue on abolition.
Following the brutal murder of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, from Denmark
and Maren Ueland, 28, from Norway, in the Atlas Mountains near Mount Toubkal,
at the hands of radicalized terror suspects, many Moroccans called for the
death penalty.
The Moroccan Organization of Human Rights (OMDH) and the World Coalition
Against the Death Penalty (WCADP) have been urging Morocco to join an
international agreement ending capital punishment.
Moreover, the Swedish and Norwegian ambassadors to Morocco conveyed their full
support for the coalition’s efforts to abolish the death penalty, which “does
not only violate human rights but also the individual’s dignity.”
(source: Morocco World News)
TAIWAN:
Death row inmate commits suicide using rubber bands
Prisoner awaiting execution in the Taipei Detention Center was found dead
yesterday, January 18, with more than 50 rubber bands around his neck.
Chen Yu’an (???) was handed the death penalty by the Supreme Court, January
2013, for the murder of his father in 2010. Chen, 37 years old at the time, had
been kicked out home, and bore resentment over favoritism shown to his
brothers. In September of that year, Chen cut his father down with a meat
cleaver, and stabbed him with a sashimi knife more than 100 times.
Detention center officials said that Chen had collected rubber bands which were
used to attach a cigarette lighter in the smoking area at the center. The
rubber bands were not contraband and prisoners were allowed to go outdoors to
smoke.
Chen is suspected to have collected the rubber bands over time before covering
himself with a blanket at bedtime January 17 and putting the rubber bands
around his neck. Chen’s cellmates did not notice any abnormalities at the time.
Prison managers were alerted to the death at 6:52am and immediately sought
medical help. Chen was sent to hospital and declared dead at 7:55am.
The Correctional Affairs Department of the Ministry of Justice are conducting
an investigation and reviewing operating procedures at the detention center.
(source: Taiwan English News)
PAKISTAN:
Parliament to decide on extension to military courts: Pak Army
The Pakistan Army has said that the country's parliament would decide about
another extension in the tenure of the controversial military courts. The
military courts were first set up in January 2015 for two years for speedy
trial of militants after the 2014 Peshawar school attack that killed nearly 150
schoolchildren.
Their tenure was extended for another 2 years in March 2017 and there is a
debate in the country whether there should be another extension. The Pakistan
Tehreek-i-Insaf government of Prime Minister Imran Khan has shown willingness
to give another term to the army-run courts but it needs the support of the
opposition as the courts were created after an amendment in the Constitution
which can be done by the support of 2./3 of lawmakers.
Army spokesman Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor said that military courts were formed by
the parliament after a consensus that the criminal judicial system of the
country was not effective in dealing with terrorism cases, Radio Pakistan
reported. Ghafoor said parliament would decide about the further extension of
the military courts.
He said such courts were not established on the desire of the army but because
it was the need of the hour to deal with terrorism and to punish terrorists
with speedy trials. He said military courts had received 717 cases during their
four years. Of these 646 cases were finalised in which 345 terrorists were
awarded the death penalty out of which 56 were executed.
Ghafoor claimed that due to formation of military courts now terrorists and
their organisations were more afraid of punishment. So far it not clear if the
government can win support of the opposition to amend the Constitution. The
Pakistan Peoples Party of ex-president Asif Ali Zardari has said it would not
support the government on this issue.
(source: devdiscourse.com)
********************
Court hands down death penalty to rapist
A special court in Lahore on Friday handed down death penalty to an accused
involved in rape of a medical student.
The court also imposed a fine of Rs 500,000 on the accused, Waqas Khalid,
besides awarding him life term imprisonment. Additional District and Sessions
Judge Chaudhry Rehmat Ali, presiding officer of special court dealing with
gender-based violence cases, conducted the trial proceedings and announced the
verdict after hearing arguments of parties and recording statement of
witnesses.
According to prosecution, accused Waqas Khalid raped a young woman after
kidnapping her in the limits of Quaid-i-Azam industrial area police station in
2016.
A case was registered against the accused under Section 376(2) (punishment of
rape) and Section 366 (kidnapping, abducting or inducing woman to compel her
marriage) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).
(source: thenation.com.pk)
UNITED KINGDOM:
Isil Beatles: Government right not to block death penalty, High Court rules
The High Court has rejected a challenge over the UK Government's decision to
share evidence with US authorities about 2 suspected Islamic State terrorists
without seeking assurances they will not face the death penalty.
El Shafee Elsheikh and Alexanda Kotey are accused of belonging to a brutal
4-man cell of Isil executioners in Syria, nicknamed The Beatles because of
their British accents, responsible for killing a number of high-profile Western
captives.
The pair were captured in January last year, sparking a row over whether they
should be returned to the UK for trial or face justice in another jurisdiction.
Mr Elsheikh's mother, Maha Elgizouli, challenged Home Secretary Sajid Javid's
decision - revealed exclusively in The Telegraph - to share 600 witness
statements gathered by the Metropolitan Police with US authorities under a
"mutual legal assistance" (MLA) agreement without seeking assurances the men
would not face execution if they were extradited and tried there.
The Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett and Mr Justice Garnham, who heard her case,
convened on Friday and backed the Government's decision by ruling against the
mother.
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett, sitting with Mr Justice Garnham, said:
"There is no general, common law duty on Her Majesty's Government to take
positive steps to protect an individual's life from the actions of a third
party and that includes requiring particular undertakings before complying with
the MLA request."
Home Secretary Sajid Javid said: "I am pleased the Court has upheld my decision
on all grounds in this case. My priority has always been to ensure we deliver
justice for the victims’ families and that the individuals suspected of these
sickening crimes face prosecution as quickly as possible.
"Our longstanding opposition to the death penalty has not changed. Any evidence
shared with the US in this case must be for the express purpose of progressing
a federal prosecution."
(source: telegraph.co.uk)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list