[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----PENN., ALA., TENN.
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Mon Jul 16 08:23:50 CDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, N.H., FLA., LA., NEB., ID., NEV.
- Next message (by thread): [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, FLA., LA., OHIO, KY.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
July 16
PENNSYLVANIA:
We need to get rid of the death penalty
To the Editor:
The Joint State Government Commission recently released a report on the death
penalty in Pennsylvania. It highlighted many issues with the system in place,
including that we may execute an innocent person.
More people in Pennsylvania have been exonerated of their capital charges than
have been executed. However, Pennsylvania still has one of the largest death
row population in the country. There is a sickeningly high probability that
there are innocent people on our death row right now.
It is disturbing that an innocent individual could be put to death by the
state. Even worse, the report found that we can't put any procedural
protections in place to prevent this from happening.
The findings of the report should horrify all Pennsylvanians. If we can't
guarantee that an innocent person won't be executed, then we need to get rid of
the death penalty.
Sydney Smith, senior at Arcadia University
(source: Letter to the Editor, Montgomery News)
ALABAMA:
Girl with special needs 'beheaded because she witnessed grandmother's
murder'----Family of 13-year-old weep as court hears of drugs deal that went
wrong
A 13-year-old girl with special needs was beheaded because she saw her
grandmother murdered in a cemetery, a US court has heard.
Mariah Lopez was killed after her grandmother reportedly went to buy drugs but
the deal turned into an argument.
The teenager saw how her grandmother was attacked with a knife by her live-in
boyfriend and left to die on the ground, testimony revealed.
Israel Palomino, 34, and Yoni Aguilar, 26, are charged with 2 counts each of
murder - punishable by the death penalty.
The grandmother, Oralia Mendoza, 49, was linked with the Sinaloa cartel, a
drug-trafficking organisation, a Madison County sheriff's investigator said.
The killings happened after Palomino, Aguilar, Ms Mendoza and a woman named
Leticia Garcia went to pick up a batch of methamphetamine in Georgia,
authorities said. The 2 women were linked to the cartel, and Palomino suspected
there might be a set-up, investigator Stacy Rutherford told a judge.
2 days later Palomino and Aguilar drove Ms Mendoza and her granddaughter to the
cemetery in Alabama. Ms Mendoza and Palomino got out of the car and argued
about the drug deal, according to Aguilar's account, recounted in court.
Aguilar told police the argument escalated, and Palomino killed Ms Mendoza.
Authorities have said her cause of death was "sharp force trauma caused by a
knife".
Because Mariah was a witness, the suspects took the girl to a secluded area
nearby, Ms Rutherford said.
Aguilar said in his statement that Palomino forced him to kill the girl,
telling investigators he was holding the knife when Palomino came up to him and
moved his arm back and forth in a sawing motion. Mariah was beheaded, Ms
Rutherford told the court.
Aguilar was said to be afraid of Palomino.
The details emerged during a preliminary hearing for Aguilar, when the district
judge ruled prosecutors had enough evidence to send the case to a grand jury.
Palomino's case is set for preliminary hearing tomorrow.
Investigators recovered 2 knives, believed to be the murder weapons. One was
found under Aguilar's mattress; the other was under Palomino's mattress.
(source: independent.co.uk)
TENNESSEE----impending execution
Tennessee Plans to Restart Executions By Killing a Man With Mental Illness
Tennessee plans to kill Billy Ray Irick next month by lethal injection. If the
execution goes through on August 9, a few weeks before his 60th birthday, he
will be the 7th person put to death in the state since 2000, the year
executions returned to Tennessee. On death row at Riverbend Maximum Security
Institution, a short drive from downtown Nashville, Irick has faced at least 3
previous execution dates, most recently in the fall of 2014. But there is an
urgency this time, his longtime attorney, Gene Shiles, says. "This one feels
much more ominous."
Irick was convicted in 1986 of raping and murdering a 7-year-old girl named
Paula Dyer in Knoxville. He was arrested and confessed soon after the crime.
Irick had stayed with the child's family for 2 years prior to the murder,
according to court filings; defense attorneys "attempted to create reasonable
doubt about the identity of the perpetrator" during the guilt phase of the
trial, yet called "no witnesses."
Like so many who end up on death row, Irick's background was fraught. In the
Nashville Scene earlier this year, Steven Hale described Irick's harrowing
upbringing - as a child, he said his mother tied him with a rope and beat him -
along with compelling evidence that he suffered from severe mental illness.
Irick "was just 6 years old the first time someone raised questions about his
mental health," Hale writes. "His school's principal referred him to the
Knoxville Mental Health Center, requesting a mental evaluation to determine,
according to court documents, 'whether Billy's extreme behavioral problems and
unmanageability in school were the result of emotional problems or whether
Billy suffered from some form of 'organic brain damage.'" A psychologist said
that he seemed to "fear his own impulses." At 13, after spending time in a home
for troubled children, Irick had a series of disturbing outbursts during a
visit home, where he bashed a TV with an axe and "used a razor to cut up the
pajamas that his younger sister was wearing as she slept."
A fuller picture of Irick's profound mental problems did not come out until
years after his conviction, Shiles explains, when an investigator working for
his federal habeas attorneys went to Knoxville and "discovered some hugely
important facts that came from the victim's family - that he was hallucinating
and having psychotic episodes at the time that this occurred." In affidavits,
members of the family described Irick "hearing voices" and "talking with the
devil." The jury never heard this evidence. If they had, there's reason to
believe that the outcome of the case could have been different. As Hale writes,
the same psychologist who examined Irick before his trial "stated in an
affidavit that he no longer had confidence in his initial evaluation, which had
been used to argue against an insanity defense."
Barred by the procedural barriers imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective
Death Penalty Act, federal courts have declined to review the new evidence of
Irick's mental illness. As his client's execution date approaches next month,
Shiles says, "No one has ever looked at the issue of his mental competence with
all the facts."
Mental illness is notoriously widespread on death row. As in the broader prison
system, it often goes undiagnosed and untreated. In his memoir, "Life After
Death," Damien Echols, who spent years on Arkansas' death row as one of the
West Memphis 3, remembers a man who used to keep everyone awake by screaming
and arguing with his own reflection for hours at a time. "The only thing they
do is shoot them full of Thorazine if they start to get riled up," he writes.
The conditions on death row - prolonged isolation in particular - make such
symptoms worse. "For many people in prison the worst fear is going insane,
because if you do all hope is lost. You will be locked up not only within these
walls, but also within your own rapidly degenerating mind."
In 1986, the same year Irick went to death row, the U.S. Supreme Court handed
down Ford v. Wainwright, involving a condemned Florida man with paranoid
schizophrenia. The ruling barred the execution of the "insane" on 8th Amendment
grounds, but left it up to the states to determine who was "competent" to be
executed. In 2007, in the case of Scott Panetti, diagnosed as paranoid
schizophrenic, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the Ford decision, ruling that
condemned people must have a rational understanding of why a state intends to
execute them. But this has done little to prevent states from killing people
with serious mental illness, including those who were suffering symptoms at the
time of their crimes. Last year, Virginia executed 35-year-old William Morva
for the murder of 2 police officers, despite significant evidence that the
killings were driven by delusions. In legal filings and interviews with The
Intercept, old friends described how a once sensitive and eccentric young man
became gripped by mental illness that led to a deadly downward spiral. Calls
for clemency fell on deaf ears; Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe refused to
intervene. Morva was executed on July 6, 2017.
More recently, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals held oral arguments last month
in the case of Andre Thomas, a Texas man commonly described in headlines as the
"murderer who ate his own eye." Rather than reconsidering whether crimes rooted
in mental illness should be punishable by death, states have sought to medicate
the condemned until they are fit to be killed. In 2012, Steven Staley faced
execution in Texas despite a history of schizophrenia. Like Irick, his life was
marked by a disturbing history of trauma and abuse. "Doctors who have examined
Staley on death row have said that he talks in a robot-like monotone yet has
'grandiose and paranoid' delusions, including the beliefs that he invented the
first car and marketed a character from Star Trek," Emily Bazelon wrote in
Slate. "He has given himself black eyes and self-inflicted lacerations and has
been found spreading feces and covered with urine." After the Tarrant County
District Attorney requested that Staley be forcibly medicated, a judge
dutifully found that "medicating Staley was the only way to ensure his
competency to be executed." Although his execution was stayed, Staley remains
on death row.
Daniel Gwynn, a condemned man in Pennsylvania, has illustrated states' callous
approach in his artwork. In a pen and ink drawing titled, "Mental illness on
death row will not stop the machine," a condemned man is haunted by the Grim
Reaper, burying his head in his hands. In the next frame, a nurse informs a
huddle of eager state officials, "OK, he's ready for the needle."
Tennessee's last execution took place in 2009, just as death penalty states
began to face problems obtaining drugs for lethal injection. In 2014, amid a
lawsuit challenging the state's execution protocol, legislators passed a law to
bring back the electric chair as an alternative. After the U.S. Supreme Court
handed down Glossip v. Gross, giving the green light for a controversial
sedative, midazolam, to be used in executions, Tennessee moved quickly to adopt
it. The state Supreme Court upheld the new protocol and, in January, set 3
execution dates, including Irick's. The attorney general then requested eight
more. Most of those are unlikely to go through, since appeals are still
pending. With a trial now underway over the newest challenge to the Tennessee's
lethal injection protocol, Irick's is the likeliest exception.
Meanwhile, a burgeoning movement has risen to address the problem of mental
illness and the death penalty. In Tennessee, a coalition called the Tennessee
Alliance for the Severe Mental Illness Exclusion, or TASMIE, spent much of the
past couple years pushing for an exception to be made among capital defendants,
to spare those suffering from severe mental illnesses from death penalty
prosecutions. On its website, it defines Severe Mental Illness, or SMI,
according to definitions provided in the American Psychiatric Association
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, identifying 5 of the most severe diagnoses:
"schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depression
with psychosis and/or delusional disorder."
The move to exclude severe mental illness from the death penalty is rooted
partly in the 2002 Supreme Court case Atkins v. Virginia, which barred the
death penalty for the people with mental disabilities - or mental "retardation"
in the language of the ruling - in light of their "diminished capacities to
understand and process information ... to engage in logical reasoning, to
control impulses, and to understand the reactions of others." Recognizing that
these same factors apply to people with severe mental illnesses, the American
Bar Association convened a Task Force on Disability and the Death Penalty,
bringing together lawyers and mental health practitioners to study the issue.
In 2006, the group proposed a resolution to categorically oppose the death
penalty for defendants who were suffering from severe mental illness or
disabilities at the times of their crimes. The resolution was adopted by the
ABA, along with much of the mental health community. But it would take 10 years
to spur new legislation across the states. In a December 2016 report, the ABA
called on advocates to turn its policy into "a meaningful tool to help states
pass laws that will establish clear standards and processes to prevent the
execution of those with severe mental illness." Today, some dozen states have
taken up the task.
In Tennessee, the bill was carefully designed to be as narrow as possible. "It
is not a repeal bill, at all," says Sarah McGee, TASMIE's educational
coordinator. "It is a mental illness bill." Where the death penalty remains
popular among the state's deeply conservative lawmakers, awareness has grown
about mental illness. In the Senate, Republican Richard Briggs, a veteran and
trauma surgeon, introduced SB0378, which "prohibits the death penalty as a
punishment for defendants suffering from severe mental illness at the time of
the offense." Witnesses at a Senate judiciary hearing in March of 2017 included
Anthony Fox, CEO of the Tennessee Mental Health Consumers' Association, who
described how living with depression and bipolar disorder had driven him to
poverty and bouts of homelessness. "These are examples of what can drive people
over the edge," he said. The bill does not ask that people go unpunished for
their crimes, he added - only that they not be sentenced to die.
Christopher Slobogin, head of the criminal justice program at Vanderbilt Law
School and an expert on mental health law, also testified, explaining the
Supreme Court precedent provided both by Atkins, as well as the 2005 decision
in Roper v. Simmons, which banned the death penalty for people who committed
their crimes as juveniles on the basis that the brains of young people are not
fully developed. "In both cases, the court emphasized that the death penalty is
reserved for the worst as the worst," Slobogin explained, a category that
cannot apply to defendants whose neurological impairments make them less
culpable or deterrable as adults. Mental illness is even further impairing, he
said, since it brings "delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking."
Testifying against the bill was Jerry Estes, head of the Tennessee District
Attorneys General Conference, and previously the longtime elected district
attorney general in Tennessee's 10th Judicial District. Estes prosecuted four
death penalty cases over the course of his 24-year career. He argued that the
bill would undermine juries, drag out the process for victims, and add a
financial burden on the state. What's more, he said, Tennessee already has
mechanisms in place to consider mental illness. Defense attorneys can bring it
up at the sentencing phase, as mitigating evidence, for example. "All they have
to do is find a witness," he said.
Legislators seemed reassured by Estes's suggestion that Tennessee juries are
already positioned to hear evidence of severe mental illness before sending
someone to death row. One lawmaker asked if he could think of any cases in
which legislation like SB0378 might have changed the outcome - "Are there any
cases you can think of?" Estes said he was not aware of any. "I can tell you of
the 4 cases that I personally was involved in. ... I can't say that it would
ever make any difference."
At a time when death penalty prosecutions are increasingly rare across the
country, it is true that carving out a narrow exception in Tennessee would have
a limited effect. By Slobogin's estimation, only 3 % of capital cases
nationwide involve severe mental illness as defined in the bill. But even a
cursory look at Tennessee's death penalty history reveals numerous cases
infected by mental illness - cases in which the state spent considerable time
and money pushing death sentences that were never carried out.
One dramatic case in point was handled by Estes himself. Ricky Thompson had
been in and out of mental hospitals for years before he was convicted and
sentenced to die in 1991 for killing his wife. Court records reveal a
decadeslong odyssey through Tennessee's death penalty system - 2 trials, 2
overturned death sentences, a slew of evaluations, hearings, and appeals -
throughout which his severe mental impairments, including multiple diagnoses of
schizophrenia, were dismissed by prosecutors. After the Tennessee Court of
Criminal Appeals overturned his conviction, ruling that his trial judge had
wrongly denied Thompson's lawyers to bring testimony regarding his mental state
at the time of the crime, Estes vowed immediately to seek the death penalty
again, upon learning about the reversal from reporters, according to the
Jackson Sun.
In a rare move, Thompson's trial judge "modified the jury's verdict to 'not
guilty by reason of insanity,'" according to court records, which could have
avoided a retrial. But the state Supreme Court overturned the ruling. In 1998,
Thompson was found incompetent to be tried again by the McMinn County Circuit
Court after evaluations by 2 state mental health experts. But the next year, "a
different trial judge determined that the Defendant had become competent."
After a 2003 retrial, Thompson was once more sentenced to die.
In 2007, the Court of Criminal Appeals at Knoxville reduced Thompson's sentence
to life. "It is rare that a capital case contains the volume of documented
history of mental disease or defects found in this case," the majority wrote,
detailing his many diagnoses of schizophrenia and hospitalizations dating back
to childhood. At Thompson's retrial, "2 mental health experts testified that
the Defendant suffered from an impairment to the frontal lobe of his brain
which would have affected his reasoning and judgment. One of the experts ...
testified that the Defendant suffered from a chronic psychiatric disorder
called schizo-affective schizophrenia which causes a loss of touch with
reality. ... No expert testimony has ever been offered to contradict these
findings, and none was presented by the State at the Defendant's trial." The
majority made clear that its decision was "not meant to minimize the brutality
of the Defendant's crime or to justify his conduct," but to give meaningful
consideration to Thompson's severe mental illness as a mitigating factor, which
his trial utterly failed to do.
Thompson did not live long after leaving death row. Just 6 months after the
court reduced his sentence to life, he died of "natural causes," according to
the Tennessee Department of Corrections. He was 57 years old.
There are no statistics tracking severe mental illness on Tennessee's death
row. But there are many more examples. Gregory Thompson (no relation) was
sentenced to die in 1985. Represented by attorneys who presented no evidence
during the guilt stage of his trial, his prison records showed that
psychiatrists who treated him diagnosed Thompson as having "either a bipolar
affective disorder, cyclic mood disorder, schizo-affective disorder or
schizophrenia," according to court documents. All of them described his
"agitated behavior, hostility, inappropriate affect, auditory and visual
hallucinations, delusions, paranoia, and thoughts of persecution." Thompson's
case attracted national media attention, including a 2007 "60 Minutes" special
that described his heavy medication regimen - 10 pills a day - and his
recollections of trying to kill guards who were "turning into insects."
Thompson died before the state could execute him, in 2014.
Investigations into such cases have revealed not only how ill-equipped courts
and prisons are to deal with people suffering from severe mental illness, but
the sadism it can unleash among those given control over their lives. In 2008,
the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee won a victory in the case of
Richard Taylor, whose 1981 death sentence for killing a prison guard was
reduced to life in prison. Taylor had insisted on representing himself at
trial. After 4 different findings that he was not competent, he finally did so,
wearing his prison uniform and sunglasses. According to the ACLU, "Taylor
called no witnesses, introduced no evidence, and presented no defense. The few
cross-examination questions he posed during the guilt-innocence phase of his
trial were delusional, and he was completely silent during the sentencing phase
of the proceedings. The jury was never presented with compelling evidence of
Taylor's difficult childhood, suicide attempts, psychiatric hospitalizations,
or severe mental illness. Jurors deliberated for less than an hour before
imposing the death sentence."
Upon arriving on death row, prison guards unleashed vicious and sustained abuse
at Taylor, ostensibly in retaliation for his crime. In a disturbing sworn
statement given to the ACLU, one former guard said he first realized Taylor had
problems when he saw him drink his own urine and smear his feces on the wall.
Yet, rather than trying to handle his mental illness, he said, guards put him
"through pure hell." They denied him food and showers, refused to let him out
of his cell, and goaded him into lashing out at them in order to beat him.
Sometimes they spoke through the air chamber behind his prison cell, with
messages like "Jesus Christ is coming to see you." At one point, the former
guard admitted, Thompson set his clothes on fire, and the officers adjusted the
vents to his cell to help the fire along.
For those tasked with representing people with severe mental illness, the
already difficult work of death penalty defense becomes immeasurably harder.
After Assistant Post-Conviction Defender Kelly Gleason was assigned to
represent the late serial killer Paul Reid in 2004, she went to see him at the
Brushy Mountain Correctional Complex in East Tennessee. In a lengthy affidavit,
she described how "Paul informed me that he knew that I was working with the
military government and that he could not believe a single word I said or
anything I wrote."
The most recent hearing on SB0378 took place this past March at the Tennessee
State Capitol. The bill had been amended - no longer was depression among the
included severe mental illnesses listed, and language had been tweaked to make
clear that a defendant's "documented history" of mental illness had to be a
"documented medical history." Speaking again on behalf of his bill, Briggs took
pains to explain the ways in which it is limited in scope and not aimed at
ending capital punishment altogether. "Personally I believe in the death
penalty," he said.
Briggs has attracted more conservative support since first introducing the
bill. Op-eds have run in newspapers across Tennessee; in January, former U.S.
Attorney Tom Dillard wrote in support of SB0378, drawing from his own
experience representing mentally ill defendants who were sent to death row and
whose conditions were not seriously considered at trial. The "good news," he
wrote, was that both clients had their sentences reduced to life. "The bad
news: The cost to taxpayers in Tennessee was enormous and ultimately neither
received adequate mental health treatment."
This time, the voice of opposition at the hearing came from Craig Northcott,
elected district attorney general in Coffee County. He called the legislation a
"solution looking for a problem." Tennessee's death penalty works just fine, he
said, adding, "I've asked repeatedly from the sponsors to give me 1 example
where our system has failed." He said that they could not provide a single one.
"Why are we even considering it?" The Senate Judiciary Committee voted down the
legislation, 5 to 4.
With Irick's execution date looming, last month the ABA published a new study
on the costs of mental illness in Tennessee's death penalty system. Its
findings were the opposite of Estes's claim that excluding defendants with
severe mental illnesses from death penalty prosecutions would be more costly.
"If a severe mental illness exclusion were to be implemented in Tennessee, it
would lead to a saving of $1.4 million to $1.9 million a year," the report
concluded. "According to our estimate, the state of Tennessee would have saved
between $57 and $78 million if this exclusion had been implemented in 1977,
when the death penalty was reinstated in the state."
The ABA's fiscal assessment will be useful as TASMIE gears up to bring forward
its legislation again next spring. When it does, the legislature would do well
to consider Tennessee's ugly treatment of defendants with severe mental
illness, rather than relying on reassurances from prosecutors. After all, some
of the most compelling moments at the state capitol were the brief reminders
that mental illness affects people across party lines - and that such people
might be worthy of compassion. At one hearing, Republican Sen. Janice Bowling
recalled a neighbor she had known as a child who had murdered her own children
while living with what would now be acknowledged as severe mental illness. "I
hadn't thought about it in years," she said. Another legislator, Art Swann,
addressed Northcott. "I happen to know a particular person that is
schizophrenic," he said. Swann did not say who he was talking about, describing
him as a fine young man. But from "time to time," he said, he "loses his
ability to know the difference between right and wrong."
(source: theintercept.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, N.H., FLA., LA., NEB., ID., NEV.
- Next message (by thread): [Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, FLA., LA., OHIO, KY.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list