[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, PENN.
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Mon Apr 23 08:17:27 CDT 2018
April 23
TEXAS:
Texas prison system stalls release of public information on
executions----Earlier this month, defense lawyers claimed Texas was botching
its executions with old drugs. Now, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
has stalled the release of information on how many lethal doses the state has
and when they expire.
The cloud of secrecy surrounding Texas executions has grown a little darker
lately.
After death penalty defense lawyers claimed the state's first 2 executions of
the year were botched because of old lethal injection drugs, the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice has stalled the release of public information
regarding the state's supply of lethal doses. Without providing a reason, the
department told a Texas Tribune reporter last week that it would take an
estimated 20 business days - until the day before the state's next scheduled
execution - to provide information on how many lethal doses the state has and
when they expire.
In the past, the records have been provided in 1/2 the time, and even that
could be unlawful. The Texas Attorney General's Office handbook on the state's
public information law says that a governmental body must produce public
information promptly, without delay. The handbook says it is a "common
misconception" that agencies can wait 10 business days before releasing the
information, as the Department of Criminal Justice has regularly done in the
past regarding execution drugs.
"There's absolutely no excuse," said Joe Larsen, a lawyer who serves on the
board of the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas. "The only reason
they're doing it is to cause problems ... to delay the story."
Asked for comment about the prolonged waiting period, TDCJ spokesman Jason
Clark said Wednesday that the department fully complies with the Texas Public
Information Act and that inventory logs of execution drugs are expected to be
released this week, instead of the previously estimated date of Feb. 21. The
Tribune requested the information Jan. 23.
9 days later, lawyers for death row inmate John Battaglia filed a last-minute
appeal before his execution claiming that the state's previous 2 executions
used old, relabeled drugs for the lethal injection that likely caused one
inmate to say he felt burning and the other to jerk on the gurney. Clark denied
the executions were botched, saying both men lost consciousness almost
immediately and were pronounced dead 13 minutes after being injected with
pentobarbital, the drug Texas currently uses in executions.
Battaglia lost the appeal, and during his execution he sighed and said, "Oh,
here, I feel it," according to The Dallas Morning News.
The defense lawyers said in the appeal that the drugs used this year were more
than a year past their "beyond-use date," similar to an expiration date. (The
lawyers also claim the beyond-use dates set by the state are "unscientific" and
not viable). One batch of drugs was previously set to expire on Jan. 22, but
more than a month ago, the drugs were re-tested and given a new expiration date
of November, according to the Battaglia appeal. The TDCJ has said it doesn't
discuss specifics on the current inventory of its execution drugs, but this
testing has happened at least one other time in the past year, since it last
reported a purchase of pentobarbital.
According to TDCJ records received by the Tribune last year, drugs set to
expire in July were removed from stock, and, on the same day, the same number
of vials were added back to the inventory with an expiration date set for
exactly 1 year in the future.
"They haven't gotten any new drugs, and they just appear to keep extending the
beyond-use date," said Maurie Levin, one of the lawyers on the Battaglia filing
who is involved in multiple lawsuits regarding Texas execution drugs. "The
thinking is they're only getting older; it's only going to get worse."
Now, the public release of information on the drugs has been stalled. For a
year, the prison system provided inventory logs and expiration dates to the
Tribune regularly, releasing the information exactly 10 business days after it
was requested, often just before 5 p.m.
Justin Gordon, head of the attorney general's office's open records division,
said government bodies can't wait out the clock to release public information.
Agencies must release the information "promptly," which in most cases is sooner
than 10 days, he said. He said the most common reasons agencies give for a
delay is because a large request requires a lot of time and compilation or
because the department is handling requests chronologically and has not yet
gotten to a request yet, even if it's straightforward.
Gordon said his division hammers home to those who repeatedly wait until the
last minute to provide records that they aren't giving good customer service
and can't expect requesters to cooperate with them. He said an unnecessary
delay "just ends up backfiring, in our experience."
The Tribune filed a complaint to the Attorney General's Office against TDCJ's
repeated delays Monday.
State Sen. John Whitmire, a Houston Democrat and chairman of the chamber's
Criminal Justice Committee, said through his chief of staff that he has
questioned TDCJ about delays in execution information in the past and that the
department has cited security reasons.
The chairman of the Texas House Corrections Committee, state Rep. James White,
R-Hillister, said he has no reason to believe the department would delay the
release out of hostility or without legal advice.
"I don't see any reason why they would purposefully wait until the 11th hour or
withhold this unless they have a lawful reason to do it," White said.
A precedent of secrecy
The Tribune has tracked Texas' execution drug supply for about a year while
states around the country struggle to find lethal doses to carry out
executions. Though there has not been a shortage of drugs reported in Texas in
several years, the state is always looking for new doses. The prison system is
currently embroiled in a legal fight with the federal government over the
attempted overseas import of another drug used in executions.
In 2015, state legislators passed a law to cement an existing practice of
shielding the identities of all people involved in executions, from the drug
supplier to the one who inserts the needle. In lobbying for the law, the
attorney general's office said suppliers reported being threatened by death
penalty opponents and wouldn't sell to the state anymore unless their
identities were kept confidential. The existence of any such threats has been
disputed.
White opposed the new secrecy law, one of only two Republicans to do so during
the 2015 session. He said Tuesday that he wasn't known as a cheerleader for the
press, but transparency in government is important. In a statement in the House
Journal explaining the reason for his 2015 vote, he said potential threats
against drug suppliers do not mean the government can butcher accountability
and transparency.
"What if there is an abortion provider or someone connected to an abortion
provider doing indigent women's health services that receives threats?" he
wrote. "Could they also ask for anonymity?"
The state is now appealing to the Texas Supreme Court lower court decisions
that called for the release of supplier information before the secrecy law was
enacted. Texas' most recent order of compounded pentobarbital came from an
unknown supplier last February, and it's unknown how long the same supplier had
been providing drugs to the department.
The most recent records on Texas' inventory came from legal filings from
lawyers with clients facing imminent execution. If the drugs set to expire in
January were all given a new beyond-use date, there would likely be 12 lethal
doses in the state's supply, more than enough for the four executions scheduled
through May. But that number can't be confirmed because the department has yet
to provide the inventory logs.
(source: Texas Tribune)
PENNSYLVANIA:
Death Penalty Sought In Girlfriend Slaying, Mother Assault
Prosecutors say they plan to seek the death penalty in the case of a man
accused of killing his girlfriend and beating her elderly mother earlier this
year in northeastern Pennsylvania.
52-year-old Joseph Marchetti Jr. is charged with criminal homicide and
aggravated assault in the Jan. 28 death of 46-year-old Antoinette Wilkinson.
Investigators allege that he beat and shot the victim in their Foster Township
home and then beat her 72-year-old mother with a lead-filled club before
shooting himself in the face.
Luzerne County prosecutors cited the nature of the homicide and the attack on
the older woman as factors that would warrant execution if Marchetti is
convicted of 1st-degree murder.
A public defender representing Marchetti didn't immediately return a call
seeking comment Sunday.
(source: Associated Press)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list