[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, N.C., FLA., ALA., LA., OHIO, NEV., CALIF., USA

[Rick Halperin]

August 31



TEXAS----stay of impending execution

Bexar County delays execution because of Hurricane Harvey----Hurricane Harvey 
has delayed the execution of a San Antonio man. Bexar County officials withdrew 
the execution date because part of the man's defense team works in the Houston 
area.



A man sentenced to death in San Antonio and facing execution next week had his 
death delayed due to Hurricane Harvey.

The execution of 36-year-old Juan Castillo was scheduled for next Thursday, but 
a Bexar County judge issued an order Wednesday delaying the man's death for 3 
months because some of his defense team works in the Houston area, which has 
been devastated by flooding from the storm. The request to move the execution 
didn't come from the defense, but from the Bexar County District Attorney's 
Office.

"A portion of Mr. Castillo's defense team resides and works in Harris County 
and the surrounding areas, and has been affected by Hurricane Harvey," wrote 
Bexar County Assistant Criminal District Attorney Matthew Howard in the motion. 
"...Under the extraordinary circumstances, the State would move to withdraw the 
execution date and seek a new date."

Castillo's new execution date is now set for Dec. 14, granting him an extra 3 
months of life in his prison cell, where he has lived almost 12 years.

In 2005, Castillo was convicted in the 2003 robbery and murder of Tommy Garcia, 
Jr. in San Antonio, according to court records. Prosecutors said Castillo and 3 
others planned to rob Garcia after luring him to a secluded area with the 
promise of sex with one of the women involved in the plan. But when Garcia 
tried to run, Castillo shot him, according to the accomplices.

There have been 5 executions in Texas this year. The next one is scheduled for 
Robert Pruett on Oct. 12.

(source: The Texas Tribune)

*******************************

Student murder suspect gets another capital charge



The man charged with killing NE student Molly Matheson has been indicted in 
another capital murder in North Texas.

Reginald Kimbro, 24, is accused of killing and sexually assaulting Megan 
Getrum, 36, of Plano within days of killing Matheson.

Matheson's body was found in her garage apartment near the Texas Christian 
University campus April 10.

On April 14, Fort Worth police interviewed Kimbro. During the interview, he 
admitted the 2 used to date and that he had been in her apartment the night she 
was killed. He said he left after a few hours and had nothing to do with her 
death. Police didn't arrest him at the time, according to an arrest warrant 
affidavit.

The same day, it is believed Getrum disappeared while out hiking in the Arbor 
Hills Nature Preserve in Plano, close to where she lived, according to the 
affidavit. Her body was found nearly 30 miles away in Lake Ray Hubbard April 15 
but was not identified until her family reported her missing.

Police found Kimbro's DNA on both women's bodies, court records say.

Kimbro has since been charged and indicted in both cases for capital murder.

Given that the deaths occurred in 2 different counties, they are being 
prosecuted separately by 2 different district attorneys.

With a charge of capital murder, a guilty verdict automatically carries a death 
sentence or mandatory life in prison without parole.

On Aug. 10, Tarrant County District Attorney Sharen Wilson said in a statement 
that Kimbro will face the death penalty if convicted.

Dallas County District Attorney Faith Johnson has not yet said whether she 
intends to seek the death penalty or life without parole when she tries Kimbro.

However, Johnson said she intends to find a just resolution for Getrum's and 
Kimbro's families.

"We continue to pray for Megan Getrum's family. We also continue to pray for 
the family of Molly Matheson of Fort Worth," Johnson said in a statement. "We 
believe that justice will be served in both of these cases."

If Johnson seeks the death penalty against Kimbro, it will be the 2nd time 
she's made that choice since becoming Dallas County's DA in 2016.

In addition to Matheson and Getrum's murders, police in Plano and South Padre 
Island believe Kimbro is linked to 2 other rapes that involved choking, in 2012 
and 2014, according to the affidavit.

The 1st assault happened in September 2012 in Plano. Kimbro was never arrested 
in the case because the victim didn't want to pursue charges, Plano police 
said.

The 2nd assault allegedly happened in March 2014 in South Padre Island. Kimbro 
claimed the sex was consensual, and the charges were dismissed, according to 
the affidavit.

However, in June, the Cameron County District Attorney indicted Kimbro on an 
aggravated sexual assault charge from the 2014 incident. The DA has not said 
why the office is pursuing the case now.

Following Kimbro's indictment in the South Padre rape, Matheson's family 
released a statement saying, "We are pleased that the South Padre District 
Attorney's Office has made the decision to indict Mr. Kimbro on the rape and 
assault that took place in 2014. However, we are frustrated that it took the 
deaths of 2 innocent victims and almost 3 years for them to come to this 
conclusion. Our daughter, Molly, and Megan Getrum would be alive today if the 
system had done its job properly 3 years ago."

Kimbro is currently being held at the Tarrant County Lon Evans Correction 
Center with bail set at over $2 million.

Officials have not said when they expect the trials to begin.

(source: The Collegian)

*****************************

Executions under Greg Abbott, Jan. 21, 2015-present----25

Executions in Texas: Dec. 7, 1982----present-----543

Abbott#--------scheduled execution date-----name------------Tx. #

26---------Oct. 12-----------------Robert Pruett----------544

27---------Oct. 18-----------------Anthony Shore----------545

28---------Oct. 26-----------------Clinton Young----------546

29---------Nov. 8------------------Ruben Cardenas---------547

30---------Nov. 16-----------------Larry Swearingen-------548

31---------Dec. 14-----------------Juan Castillo----------549

32---------Jan. 30-----------------William Rayford--------550

(sources: TDCJ & Rick Halperin)








NORTH CAROLINA:

NC Lawmaker Calls For Return Of Electric Chair



North Carolina Representative Justin Burr on Aug. 29 posted to a social media 
profile that he advocates for the return of the electric chair in the death 
penalty.

The Republican Congressman shared his thoughts on the abandoned device through 
his Facebook page, according to Spectrum News:

"North Carolina's Electric Chair from death row. The chair was originally used 
to put inmates to death by electrocution. After North Carolina switched to 
executing inmates by lethal gas, the chair was converted and put to use in the 
gas chamber until the late 1990s. Justice was served to nearly 200 convicted 
murders in this chair. The chair has been in the possession of our state 
history museum since 2000. I think it's time to put it back to work."

Burr reported that he has been hard at work on legislation that would bring the 
death penalty back to North Carolina after more than a decade of zero 
executions.

A group of bikers gave back to those who served, donating $92,000 to veterans 
suffering from PTSD:

"I want the death penalty to be used again in North Carolina, to stop the 
attempts to delay justice for victims and their families," said Burr, according 
to News Observer.

Burr is also an outspoken supporter of a recently-proposed North Carolina House 
Bill that would grant civil immunity to drivers who injure people demonstrating 
in roadways under a specific set of circumstances, according to truthout.

Some have lashed back at backers of House Bill 330 for viewing the bill as a 
callous, and even offensive reaction to the protesters injured or killed during 
the Aug. 12 demonstration in Charlottesville, Va.

North Carolina lawmakers, including Burr, released a statement on the bill on 
Aug. 14:

"It is intellectually dishonest and a gross mischaracterization to portray 
North Carolina House Bill 330 as a protection measure for the act of violence 
that occurred in Charlottesville this past weekend. Any individual who 
committed a deliberate or willful act, such as what happened this weekend in 
Charlottesville, would face appropriately severe criminal and civil 
liabilities. The one-page bill is tightly tailored to protect innocent drivers 
exercising due care from individuals from blocking a public street or highway 
while respecting the right to protest according to the 1st Amendment."

The ACLU, on the other had, has been largely critical of HB 330.

"It's saying that somebody who's driving who hits a protester wouldn't be 
civilly liable for that action if the protester is in the street without a 
permit," said Susana Birdsong, a representative of the North Carolina ACLU. 
"That has the potential to do a lot of damage to people's inclination to 
protest."

(source: America Now)








FLORIDA:

Florida Governor Takes 2 More Murder Cases From Prosecutor



Florida's governor has taken 2 more capital murder cases from a prosecutor who 
is opposed to the death penalty.

Gov. Rick Scott signed executive orders Wednesday reassigning the cases from 
Orlando State Attorney Aramis Ayala to a prosecutor in a neighboring district.

State Attorney Brad King's office will handle a new sentencing for Jermaine 
Foster, who was previously sentenced to death following a 1994 murder 
conviction. The office will also prosecute Robert Cardin, who is charged with 
killing his elderly mother and brother in May.

Scott, a Republican, began taking cases away from Ayala, a Democrat, after her 
March announcement that she would no longer seek the death penalty. They argued 
the legality of this before the Florida Supreme Court in June, but no decision 
has been announced.

(source: Associated Press)

**********************

State appealing decision to vacate Carlie Brucia's killer's death sentence



Court proceedings have been halted in the re-sentencing of Joseph Smith for the 
2004 kidnapping, rape and murder of Carlie Brucia as the state appeals the 
District Court of Appeal's decision to vacate his death sentence in the wake of 
changes to Florida's death penalty laws.

On Feb. 1, 2004, 11-year-old Carlie was walking home from a friend's house when 
Smith abducted her as she passed the back of Evie's Car Wash, 4715 Bee Ridge 
Road, Sarasota. Her abduction was captured by the car wash's video surveillance 
system and used as key evidence at Smith's trial.

Her body was found at Central Church of Christ, 6221 Proctor Road after Smith's 
arrest and the confession that followed.

When a judge vacated Smith's death sentence in July, he was not granted an 
automatic life sentence as his defense sought. Instead, Smith was granted a new 
penalty phase of his trial which would still allow the state the opportunity to 
re-seek the death penalty under Florida's new law.

Smith's scheduled court appearance for 1:30 p.m. Thursday for a case management 
hearing was canceled after State Attorney's Office filed an appeal with the 
Florida Supreme Court last week.

Joe Brucia, the father of Carlie Brucia, holding a picture of Carlie that was 
dropped off to the State Attorney's office and give to him. Brucia read a 
statement to the jury during the 1st day of the sentencing stage of Joseph 
Smith. Smith was found guilty of the murder of Carlie Brucia.

Circuit Judge Charles Roberts then issued a stay in all local proceedings in 
the case until there's a decision from the Florida Supreme Court.

After being found guilty by a jury on Nov. 17, 2005, of 1st-degree murder, 
sexual battery and kidnapping, the same jury later that year voted 10-2 
recommending Smith be sentenced to death. Smith was sentenced to die on March 
15, 2006, by Circuit Judge Andrew D. Owens, in addition to 2 life sentences for 
kidnapping and sexual battery.

Florida's law surrounding the death penalty fell into limbo on Jan. 12, 2016, 
with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida that ruled it was 
unconstitutional that in Florida a judge, not a jury, has the ultimate say in 
whether to sentence someone to death.

Working to fix the issue raised by Hurst, the state legislation passed a new 
law on March 7, 2016. The Hurst case was remanded back to the Florida Supreme 
Court, and among the decisions in Hurst v. State was that a unanimous vote by 
the jury is necessary to impose death.

On the same date, the Florida Supreme Court also ruled in Perry v. State that 
Hurst required a unanimous vote by a jury to sentence someone to death, making 
the new legislation invalid.

Later in a Dec. 22 ruling in Asay v. State, the Florida Supreme Court ruled 
that only death row inmates whose cases were finalized after the 2002 U.S. 
Supreme Court ruling in Ring v. Arizona qualified for a re-sentencing hearing.

(source: bradenton.com)








ALABAMA----2 new and impending execution dates

Alabama sets execution dates for 2 inmates; both set to die in October



The Alabama Supreme Court has scheduled October execution dates for 2 death row 
inmates.

Jeffrey Borden is set to be executed on October 5, and Torrey Twane McNabb on 
October 19.

The Alabama Attorney General's office had asked the state's highest court 
earlier this month to set execution dates for 3 inmates-- Borden, McNabb, and 
Doyle Lee Hamm. No execution date was set for Hamm.

McNabb has spent the last 18 years on death row, after being convicted of 
fatally shooting Montgomery police officer Anderson Gordon in September 1997. 
McNabb was convicted on 2 capital murder counts-- 1 for killing Gordon while he 
was on duty, and 1 for killing him as Gordon sat in his patrol car. McNabb also 
was found guilty of 2 additional counts of attempted murder.

Borden has been on death row for 22 years, and was convicted of the murders of 
Cheryl Borden and her father Roland Harris. The murders took place at a family 
gathering in Gardendale on Christmas Eve 1993. Court records show Borden 
travelled from Huntsville to Gardendale to bring his 3 children to Cheryl 
Borden, his legally separate wife and the children's mother. After Cheryl 
Borden arrived, Jeffrey Borden shot her in the back of her head outside the 
house in the presence of the children. Borden then shot Roland Harris, his 
wife's father, in the back as Harris tried to run into the house.

AG Steve Marshall said earlier this month that the state does not anticipate 
any problems securing enough drugs to execute the men. "Yes, we have the 
means," he said, when asked if the state would be able to follow through.

John Palombi, Assistant Federal Defender for the Federal Defenders for the 
Middle District of Alabama who represents both McNabb and Borden, commented on 
both execution dates:

"It was premature for the Alabama Supreme Court to set an execution date for 
Mr. McNabb. Mr. McNabb has a pending case in Montgomery Circuit Court 
challenging the legality of his death sentence after the Supreme Court's 
decision in Hurst v. Florida... This case was filed long before the State 
requested an execution date for Mr. McNabb, and the Circuit Court previously 
indicated that it wanted a hearing on the issue," he said.

"Jeffrey Borden is severely mentally ill, and has been since at least the age 
of 17, when he sustained a serious head injury that left him in a coma for four 
days and permanently damaged his judgment and ability to control his impulses. 
The same principles that exempt the intellectually disabled and people who 
committed crimes before the age of 18 from being executed apply to cases like 
Mr. Borden's, where the individual who committed the crime had a diminished 
ability to control himself or understand the full implications of his actions," 
Palombi said.

Alabama has executed 2 death row inmates in 2017 - Tommy Arthur on May 25 and 
Robert Melson on June 8.

(source: al.com)








LOUISIANA:

Rushing toward a death sentence



It took 15 years to overturn Calvin Burdine's death sentence, but at last, in 
2001, the federal appeals court in New Orleans accepted a defendant's right to 
an attorney who remains awake at trial.

It now seems odd that there should ever have been any doubt that a sleeping 
attorney cannot provide the effective counsel guaranteed by the Constitution.

But at least there was always a chance that Burdine's attorney, Joe Cannon, 
would suddenly open his eyes and shout "Objection!" When Kevin Daigle goes on 
trial for his life, however, he knows there is no chance his attorney, David 
Price, will participate in proceedings.

After Price died last month, Daigle sought more time to prepare for trial, but 
prosecutors objected and state Judge Guy Bradberry ordered that it take place 
as scheduled Sept. 18.

Daigle, of Lake Charles, is accused of murdering state trooper Steven Vincent 2 
years ago. Daigle, then 54, allegedly opened fired when his truck got stuck in 
a ditch and Vincent stopped to help. Daigle, whose roommate was subsequently 
found murdered, was evidently out of his mind on drink and painkillers at the 
time. His lengthy rap sheet includes multiple DWIs, and he is such a blot on 
humanity that it will require some pretty fancy lawyering if he is to be spared 
the death sentence.

Acquittal seems out of the question. Daigle was caught on police radio 
threatening Vincent and was then taken in, together with a sawed-off shotgun, 
after passing motorists pinned him down. Assistant Calcasieu Parish District 
Attorney Rick Bryant can keep his powder dry until the penalty phase of the 
trial, which Price was presumably focused on when he suffered a heart attack 
following cancer surgery.

The loss of Price, with his years of experience as a public defender in capital 
cases, may make it somewhat easier for Bryant to sell the jury on death, but he 
wasn't about to give Daigle any chance to regroup. Bradberry noted that Price's 
death was not unexpected, he had been repeatedly assured that the trial could 
proceed on schedule regardless, and "justice delayed is justice denied." Kyla 
Romanach, who had been working under Price, does not need any more time to 
prepare "exceptional representation during the trial," and Daigle has "more 
than enough information to provide an effective mitigation defense," Bradberry 
ruled.

Maybe so, but the state also has more than enough information to press for 
Daigle's death. The state's case can surely withstand a delay. And Romanach 
will be saving the taxpayer a whole bunch of money if she can keep Daigle off 
death row.

The outcome of the case is easy to predict. Daigle will be found guilty of 
1st-degree murder, and die in Angola. But if the jury comes back with a death 
sentence, we will have to cough up for extra security and appeals while he 
keeps the executioner at bay until succumbing to natural causes decades hence. 
Better to give him life in the first place.

Certainly, Daigle deserves the worst the criminal justice system can throw at 
him, and a death sentence is a powerful symbol of society's revulsion. But 
capital punishment is withering away in Louisiana.

Since the U.S. Supreme Court restored the death penalty in 1976, Louisiana has 
executed 28 convicts. The last one, Gerald Bordelon, came in 2010, but he 
didn't count because he waived appeals. Not since 2002 has a murderer been 
executed against his will. That was Leslie Dale Martin, who, like Daigle, 
hailed from Calcasieu Parish.

At his 1st court appearance in 2015, Daigle said he expected to get the death 
sentence, which is indeed a fair bet for a cop killer. But what is the point of 
spending millions on a capital case when nobody expects an execution at the end 
of it?

It seemed that Burdine was headed for federal death row after an appeals court 
panel initially declined to vacate his conviction and sentence, ruling that it 
had not been established that Cannon's naps occurred at crucial stages of the 
trial. The full court finally saw reason, and Burdine got a plea deal that gave 
him life.

Anyone who has been to a courthouse will likely have encountered incompetent or 
drunk defense counsel, and Cannon was probably not the first to slumber 
mid-trial. You've heard of dead man walking too, but, until now, that never 
meant the defense attorney.

(source: The New Orleans Advocate)





OHIO:

Man who killed ex on I-75 gets stay of execution



The Ohio Supreme Court has granted a stay of execution for a man convicted of 
killing his ex-girlfriend on the side of Interstate 75 in Warren County, 
according to documents obtained by this news outlet.

Terry Froman kidnapped the victim, Kim Thomas, from her Mayfield, Ky., home in 
September 2014. He led police on a chase before beating Thomas and shooting her 
4 times.

Froman was convicted on charges of aggravated murder and kidnapping earlier 
this year. A Warren County judge accepted the jury's recommendation of a death 
penalty.

Froman's attorney filed an appeal and requested the stay of execution last 
month, according to court documents.

The Supreme Court's decision Wednesday to grant the stay means that no 
execution date will be set while the appeal is pending. Froman is also accused 
of killing Thomas' 17-year-old son, Michael "Eli" Mohney in the Mayfield home 
before he kidnapped Thomas.

(source: journal-news.com)








NEBRASKA:

Mottas back in court Thursday to ask to be removed from Garcia case



Serial killer Anthony Garcia's case will be back before a judge Thursday 
morning.

WOWT 6 News has learned that his Chicago Attorneys, the Motta's, are expected 
to withdraw as counsel in the case. That means the sentencing and appeal phase 
will be left to the Public Advocacy Commission.

It's also possible that this will clear the way for Judge Gary Randall to 
schedule the next step which is for Garcia to face a 3 judge panel to decide if 
he gets the death penalty or life in prison.

(source: WOWT news)








NEVADA----impending execution//volunteer

Nevada Plans to Use Fentanyl in Upcoming Execution----Medical professionals say 
the state's new lethal injection protocol "doesn't make much sense."



Nearly a year ago, Nevada death row inmate Scott Dozier asked to be executed, 
telling a state court judge he would forego his appeals. A doctor deemed 
Dozier, who was convicted of the 2002 shooting and dismemberment death of 
22-year-old Jeremiah Miller, competent to make the decision. But a problem 
arose: The state had no drugs to carry out a lethal injection.

Keeping with a recent trend of pharmaceutical industry opposition to the use of 
their products in executions, the drug manufacturer Pfizer ordered its 
distributors not to sell midazolam and hydromorphone to prisons. Nevada 
solicited bids for those drugs from suppliers and received zero offers.

Earlier this month, Nevada officials announced a solution in the form of a new 
drug combination, which numerous experts say has never been used in a U.S. 
execution. At Dozier's execution on November 14 - the state's 1st in more than 
a decade - he will be injected with fentanyl (the well-known opioid), diazepam 
(the sedative better known as Valium), and cisatracurium (a muscle relaxant 
that causes paralysis).

Though the U.S. Supreme Court has declared that some pain during an execution 
does not violate the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment, the 
new combination is sure to revive debates over how executions are carried out.

Much is still unknown. Brooke Keast, a department spokeswoman, said in an email 
the full protocol - which may include the order of the drugs, who will 
administer them, and who will witness the execution - will be released in the 
coming weeks, and that the drugs were "suggested" by the state's Chief Medical 
Officer John DiMuro. DiMuro declined to comment, citing pending litigation.

Several medical professionals say there is no obvious explanation for why these 
drugs were selected. "It doesn't make much sense; you don't need Valium if you 
have fentanyl," said Susi Vassallo, a New York University professor of 
emergency medicine who has written on lethal injection. Valium "makes you 
sleepy," and can kill in large doses, but fentanyl also brings about 
unconsciousness without pain, and the drug's deadliness is well-known, having 
caused thousands of overdose deaths around the country in recent years.

The potential problems will come with cisatracurium, which is related to 
curare, a paralyzing agent first discovered in South America, where indigenous 
people used it to poison the tips of their hunting arrows. Fentanyl can stop 
the heart, but it is short acting and will need to be given in a massive 
ongoing dose, because otherwise the prisoner may wake up. If he does, the 
cisatracurium will mask his consciousness while also potentially giving him the 
sensation - unobservable by witnesses - of being unable to breathe. "People who 
have recovered from it have said that they couldn't breathe, and they knew they 
were suffocating," Vassallo said. "The paralytic is only going to disguise 
whether the fentanyl is being administered properly."

It is for this reason, she said, that the American College of Veterinarians 
forbids the use of paralytics when animals are euthanized.

The fentanyl and diazepam "may be trying to block the experience of 
suffocation," said Joel B. Zivot, an Emory University anesthesiologist who has 
served as an expert witness in legal challenges to execution protocols. "The 
fentanyl takes away pain, and the Valium takes away anxiety. Both drugs are 
limited in their ability to do that, and of course neither is designed to block 
the pain or anxiety of death. So that's just a show."

"This is not actually science," he added. "It's not actually medicine. It is a 
grotesque impersonation of those things."

Such analysis may play some role in forthcoming legal battles, which have often 
followed announcements of new drug combinations. Nevada public defenders are 
demanding in court that the state give them more information. A hearing is 
scheduled for September 11.

Dozier himself is not concerned about the possibility of pain. "If they tell 
me, 'Listen there's a good chance it's going to be a real miserable experience 
for you, for those few hours before you actually expire,' I'm still gonna do 
it," he said in court recently. The state attorney general has argued that this 
renders moot any legal challenges on his behalf, and that opponents of the 
method would need to offer an alternative.

Scott Coffee, a Clark County public defender, argues that the constitutional 
ban on cruel and unusual punishment is not only about Dozier's interest. "What 
if [the method] was Ajax and peanut butter, or dismemberment?" he said. "Dozier 
could say it's okay, but there would still be a public outcry."

The gradual restriction of drug supplies has led multiple states to turn to new 
drugs and combinations, which have in turn led to visible agony among prisoners 
in Arizona, Ohio, and Oklahoma. The Supreme Court ruled in 2014 that some pain 
does not make an execution cruel and unusual punishment. "While most humans 
wish to die a painless death, many do not have that good fortune," Justice 
Samuel Alito wrote in Glossip v. Gross. "Holding that the Eighth Amendment 
demands the elimination of essentially all risk of pain would effectively 
outlaw the death penalty altogether."

Nevada bought its drugs from Cardinal Health, a wholesale pharmaceutical 
distributor. Company spokesman Corey Kerr responded to a list of questions 
about the drugs by writing in an email, "We hold ourselves to the highest 
standards of accuracy and safety and have robust controls in place. We follow 
every manufacturer's specific instructions to ensure the safe distribution of 
their products."

Numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers have opposed the use of their drugs in 
lethal injections, but it has not been made public which companies produced 
these drugs. It is inevitable that reporters and activists will start looking 
for the sources. "It's pretty troubling that Nevada has responded to the 
industry opposition to the use of 'traditional' execution drugs in executions 
by coming up with an entirely untested, experimental, and dangerous new 
protocol," said Maya Foa of Reprieve, a British human rights organization that 
works with drug manufacturers to cut off supplies for executions.

In the meantime, New York state comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, who manages the 
state's Common Retirement Fund, an investor in Cardinal Health, intends to 
propose that shareholders request that the company issue a report on its 
efforts to prevent their drugs from being used in executions. "Association with 
executions puts the company's reputation at risk and opens it to legal and 
financial damage," DiNapoli said in an email. "We invest the state pension fund 
for more than 1 million active and retired public workers and I am duty-bound 
to protect their investment portfolio from risks like this." DiNapoli has filed 
similar requests to other pharmaceutical companies.

The cycle of new drugs, legal challenges, and questions of supply is not the 
first and surely will not be the last of its kind. Zivot, the anesthesiologist, 
sees this round as further proof that the public should realize it is 
impossible to conduct a "humane" execution. "If the state is inclined to 
execute, it might be the time again to take up hanging, the electric chair or 
the bullet," he wrote in a 2013 column for USA Today. Nevada is 1 of 2 states, 
along with Utah, that has carried out an execution by firing squad, in 1913, 
and was the 1st state to utilize the lethal gas chamber, in 1924. Dozier, for 
his part, prefers the firing squad. "That would be the way to go," he told a 
friend, "if it was up to me."

(source: themarshallproject.org)








CALIFORNIA:

Haobsh Death-Penalty Decision Delayed----It Would Be DA Dudley's 1st 
Death-Penalty Case



District Attorney Joyce Dudley's decision whether or not to seek the death 
penalty against Pierre Haobsh - accused of killing Chinese herbal doctor Henry 
Han; his wife, Jennie; and their 5-year-old daughter, Emily, last March - has 
been delayed another 3 weeks. Dudley and her department???s leadership team 
received a major pulse of documents and information from the defense attorney, 
Christine Voss of the Public Defender's Office, late last week, and additional 
time is needed to review the new information. The case was scheduled for 
arraignment this Tuesday, August 29.

Dudley, now in her 2nd term, has yet to file a death-penalty case as DA. While 
Dudley hasn't taken a formal position against capital punishment, she's been 
critical of its application in California and has opted not to pursue it in a 
couple of high-profile murder cases filed on her watch. Last November, voters 
statewide approved an initiative designed to speed up executions, Proposition 
66, which was upheld - though amended - last week by the California Supreme 
Court.

Details of the Han murders seem ripe for the application of capital charges: 
Prosecutors allege Haobsh, a 27-year-old business partner of Dr. Han's, acted 
with great premeditation and deliberation and that he killed for financial 
gain. That he is accused of killing Han's 5-year old daughter adds 
significantly to the case for the death penalty.

Defense attorneys met with Dudley and her leadership team last week to lay out 
information that may mitigate against the apparent heinousness of the killing. 
Typically, this process involves information calling into question the capacity 
of the accused.

Currently, Santa Barbara County has 9 individuals on California's death row at 
San Quentin. The most recent - Joshua Miracle - was sent in 2006 after having 
pleaded guilty to stabbing an associate 50 times in a drug deal gone bad. There 
the longest is Malcolm Robbins, who was sentenced to death in 1983 for 
kidnapping, raping, and murdering a Goleta boy in 1980 and then setting his 
body on fire.

(source: Santa Barbara Independent)

*************************

How to clear up confusion about the death penalty



Re "Scott Dekraai should get death penalty" (Letters, Aug. 25)

Letter writer Isadora Johnson states that she is usually "against the death 
penalty, but in the case of Scott Evans Dekraai, confessed killer of 8, 
wounding another while wearing a bullet proof vest, it seems that the death 
penalty should be warranted."

Should we take that to mean that those among the 750 inmates on California's 
death row who might not have been wearing a bullet-proof vest while murdering 
maybe only 6 or 7 (or possibly even killed just 1 person) should not be put to 
death?

Perhaps a way of helping Californians decide their feelings on the issue of 
capital punishment might be in establishing a requirement for all citizens to 
register.

The California state income tax bills of we citizens who have registered as 
being opposed to the death penalty would proudly show that we have agreed to 
bear the entire costs of guarding, housing, feeding, including the costs of all 
legal appeals of those who have been convicted of capital crimes.

Those California citizens who have registered as being in favor of the death 
penalty would be required to bear none of these costs. Merely considering the 
possibility of such a scenario might be of assistance in helping us to make up 
our minds on this issue.

David M. Bouchier, Long Beach

(source: Letter to the Editor, Press-Telegram)








USA:

Gary Lee Sampson to appeal 2nd death sentence



Gary Lee Sampson, a man who freely admits to taking 3 innocent lives, is not 
done fighting for his own.

The 57-year-old convicted killer, who is facing his 2nd death sentence for a 
murderous 4-day rampage in 2001, filed a notice in U.S. District Court this 
week indicating that he plans to take his case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for 
the First Circuit. The filing comes less than 2 weeks after Sampson's trial 
judge, Leo Sorokin, denied a slew of post-trial motions.

The notice gives no indication as to how Sampson's attorneys would argue his 
appeal, which covers his death sentence, Sorokin's post-trial decision and "all 
other rulings and orders of the district court concerning Mr. Sampson." It will 
be the 2nd time the appeals panel will consider a death sentence for Sampson, a 
former drifter from Abington.

Sampson was first sentenced to death in 2003 for the carjacking murders of 2 
men on the South Shore, but that sentence was later overturned by a federal 
judge who determined that one of Sampson's jurors had lied about her 
background. Sampson was sentenced to death again this past February following 
an 8-week trial in U.S. District Court.

Sampson has had mixed luck with the U.S. Court of Appeals in the 16 years since 
he committed the murders. The court denied Sampson's appeal of his 1st death 
sentence in 2007, but then in 2013 agreed with U.S. District Court Judge Mark 
Wolf's decision to reverse it against prosecutors's opposition.

Sampson has been behind bars since July 2001, when he turned himself in to 
Vermont police and confessed to killing the 3 men. He started the rampage by 
carjacking and murdering Philip McCloskey, a 69-year-old retired plumber from 
Abington, on July 24 after McCloskey pulled over and offered him a ride. 3 days 
later, Sampson carjacked Jonathan Rizzo, a 19-year-old college student who had 
also pulled over to help him, and forced the teenager to drive at knifepoint to 
Abington, where he killed Rizzo and stole his car. Sampson then drove to New 
Hampshire and murdered Robert Whitney after breaking into an empty lake home.

Sampson was tried separately for Whitney's murder and received a life sentence.

Massachusetts does not have a state death penalty, but defendants like Sampson 
charged with federal crimes in the state can still be put to death. Sampson is 
now 1 of 61 defendants on federal death row, according to the Death Penalty 
Information Center. Also on that list is Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar 
Tsarnaev.

If the appeals court denies Sampson's appeal, he could turn to the U.S. Supreme 
Court, which refused to hear his 1st case in 2008.

(source: The Patriot Ledger)

*******************

Talmudic opposition to capital punishment



The Torah is a living, vibrant document. Its teachings are and must be 
applicable at all times and in every generation, forever and always. I believe 
this to be an absolute of Jewish life. It is challenging then to read a passage 
in this week's Torah portion that takes for granted the permissibility of 
capital punishment. "If a man has committed a sin worthy of death, and he is 
... hanged from a tree ... you must surely bury him the same day. ..." 
(Deuteronomy 21:22-23)

Here and elsewhere it is clear that the Torah allowed for capital punishment. 
Yet, as Joseph Telushkin has written, "There are few areas in Jewish law where 
the biblical and talmudic view so conflict as in the matter of capital 
punishment. The dominant, although not exclusive, line of argument proffered in 
the Talmud opposes the death sentence. ..."

Though the Torah allowed for capital punishment for a select number of crimes, 
the rabbis of the Talmudic era created juridical standards that made it all but 
impossible to carry out a death sentence.

I do not expect the United States to adhere to Jewish law in regard to the 
death penalty. Nonetheless, a set of legal standards must be in place to limit 
its application. Given the racial and economic disparities in our nation, 
particularly as regards the justice system, it is by any reasonable measure 
impossible to make the case that even minimum standards are met for carrying 
out the death penalty. To read more about this I recommend "Just Mercy" by 
Bryan Stevenson.

He offers this analysis: "The death penalty in America is a failed, expensive 
policy defined by bias and error. Modern death sentences are disproportionately 
meted out to African-Americans accused of crimes against white victims.

Mounting evidence shows that innocent people have been sentenced to death and 
that serious legal errors infect the administration of capital punishment: 156 
people have been exonerated and released from death row. The evidence is clear 
that executions do not lower homicide rates ... and polls show that a majority 
of Americans prefer life over death sentences." (Equal Justice Initiative 
website)

It should be noted that in the state of Israel the only capital crime is 
genocide. Nazi war criminal Adolph Eichmann, y'mach sh'mo, his name should be 
erased,is the only person ever executed. Despite the atrocity of his crimes, 
leading intellectuals spoke out against his execution including philosopher 
Martin Buber, Jewish mysticism scholar Gershom Scholem, poet Leah Goldberg, and 
painter Yehuda Bacon, himself a Holocaust survivor.

While the Torah may accept the death penalty, in principle and possibly in 
practice, our rabbinic ancestors were wise to set the bar so high as to make it 
a practical impossibility.

(source: Commentary; Rabbi Eddie Sukol directs The Shul in Pepper 
Pike----clevelandjewishnews.com)