[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Wed Sep 28 09:19:28 CDT 2016
Sept. 28
IRAN:
U.S. Congress Resolution Condemns Iran Regime's Mass Executions
An article in the Huffington Post has highlighted a new resolution in the
United States Congress on the 1988 massacre of political prisoners in Iran.
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, President of the International American Council, wrote: "A
resolution (H.Res. 159) was recently introduced in the U.S. Congress in
reference to one of the worst mass executions of political prisoners since WWII
by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The House Homeland Security Chair, Mike
McCaul, introduced the resolution, which was cosponsored by the House Foreign
Affairs Committee Chair Ed Royce, Ranking Member Eliot Engel, and Rules
Committee Chair Rep. Peter Sessions. The resolution came as Hassan Rouhani,
president of a government that ranked as the world's top executioner per
capita, was addressing the 71st Session of the United Nations General
Assembly."
In the run-up to Rouhani's speech, the Associated Press reported that thousands
of protesters gathered outside the United Nations protesting Iran's human
rights abuses, executions, and the 1988 massacre of more than 30,000 prisoners.
The speakers included former Democratic vice presidential candidate and Senator
Joe Lieberman, and Geoffrey Robertson, former Head of the UN war crimes
tribunal for Sierra Leone who wrote a report on Iran 1988 massacre published on
the United Nations Arts Initiative.
The resolution introduced in Congress "condemns the Government of the Islamic
Republic of Iran for the 1988 massacre of political prisoners and [calls] for
justice for the victims."
Rafizadeh pointed out that the resolution adds that "over a 4-month period in
1988, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran carried out the barbaric
mass executions of thousands of political prisoners and many unrelated
political groups. ... [A]ccording to a report by the Iran Human Rights
Documentation Center, the massacre was carried out pursuant to a fatwa, or
religious decree, issued by then Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini,
that targeted the People's Mojahedin of Iran (PMOI), also known as the
Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK);"
The resolution quotes one of Iran's own senior former officials, who said the
1988 massacre was "the greatest crime committed during the Islamic Republic,
for which history will condemn us." Accordingly, in 1988, the Islamic Republic
executed the thousands of prisoners, primarily affiliated with the main
opposition movement Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), due to their political beliefs.
The victims were buried in mass graves in Iran after they were shot or hung in
matter of a few months.
According to a November 2, 2007, report by Amnesty International, "between 27
July 1988 and the end of that year, thousands of political prisoners [in Iran],
including prisoners of conscience, were executed in prisons nationwide."
The resolution adds that "Those personally responsible for these mass
executions include senior officials serving in the current Government of Iran;
... [P]risoners were reportedly brought before the commissions and briefly
questioned about their political affiliation, and any prisoner who refused to
renounce his or her affiliation with groups perceived as enemies by the regime
was then taken away for execution," H.Res. 159 noted.
Accordingly, the victims included "thousands of people, including teenagers and
pregnant women, imprisoned merely for participating in peaceful street protests
and for possessing political reading material, many of whom had already served
or were currently serving prison sentences."
The congressional resolution states, "[P]risoners were executed in groups, some
in mass hangings and others by firing squad, with their bodies disposed of in
mass graves."
According to Amnesty International, "the majority of those killed were
supporters of the PMOI [MEK], but hundreds of members and supporters of other
political groups . . . were also among the execution victims."
Based on the Congressional resolution, "The later waves of executions targeted
religious minorities, such as members of the Baha'i faith, many of whom were
often subjected to brutal torture before they were killed." It add "The
families of the executed were denied information about their loved ones and
were prohibited from mourning them in public".
The resolution mentions that "in a recently disclosed audiotape, the late
Hussein Ali Montazeri, a grand ayatollah who served as Khomeini's chief deputy,
noted the regime's efforts to target the MEK and said that the 1988 mass
killings were "the greatest crime committed during the Islamic Republic, for
which history will condemn us'."
A report by Amnesty International has concluded "there should be no impunity
for human rights violations, no matter where or when they took place. The 1988
executions should be subject to an independent impartial investigation, and all
those responsible should be brought to justice, and receive appropriate
penalties???"
According to the resolution, "The current Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was
reportedly aware of, and later publicly condoned the massacre."
"The Montazeri audiotape was disclosed by Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri's
son, Ahmad, a moderate cleric, who posted the confidential audio of his father
on his website but was ordered by the intelligence to remove it," Rafizadeh
writes.
Montazeri states in the tape, "You [Iranian officials] will be in the future
etched in the annals of history as criminals. The greatest crime committed
under the Islamic Republic, from the beginning of the Revolution until now,
which will be condemned by history, is this crime [mass executions] committed
by you."
Rafizadeh adds: "Ironically, all those people to whom Montazri is addressing
and warning in the audio, all of those who were involved in these crimes,
appear to enjoy high positions currently. Mostafa Pourmohammadi was a
representative of the intelligence ministry to the notorious Evin prison, and
he was appointed by the so-called moderate president Hassan Rowhani to be
justice minister. Ebrahim Raeisi was a public prosecutor and is appointed to be
the head of Astan Quds Razavi, which has billions of dollars in revenues."
One of Iran's current officials is Rouhani's justice minister Mostafa
Pourmohammadi. Recently, after the release of a tape in which the Islamic
Republic's no. 2 official was heard condemning the crime, Pourmohammadi
defended the commission of the massacre and said he is "proud" to have carried
out "God's commandments" in killing the political opponents.
Hussein Ali Nayeri was a judge and is now the deputy of the Supreme Court of
Iran. In his memoir, Montzari writes that he told Nayeri to stop the executions
at least in the month of Moharram religious holidays, but Nayeri said according
to BBC: "We have executed so far 750 people in Tehran... we get the job done
with [executing] another 200 people and then we will listen to whatever you
say."
What is crucial to point out is that realistically speaking, these people are
only few of those who were involved in such large scale crimes against
humanity. They have been awarded more senior positions, power, and money.
Montazeri advised the ruling politicians that "Beware of 50 years from now,
when people will pass judgment on the leader (Khomeini) and will say he was a
bloodthirsty, brutal and murderous leader." It's worth noting that the
revelation of this mass execution was pointing to only one summer of the
37-year history of the Islamic Republic. What else is hidden there that we are
not aware of?
The writings, messages and audio from Iran's ex-heir Supreme Leader highlight
the systematic methods that the officials of the Islamic Republic use to
oppress the opposition. Executions or brutal punishments against the opposition
have become the cornerstone of Iran's political establishment as Iran ranks top
in the world when it comes to executions per capita.
The Islamic Republic's 1988 massacre and Montazeri's audio point to one of the
worst crimes against humanity committed in modern history and it continues to
occur. It points to the means that the government uses to control the
population and silence the opposition. It points to the interconnectedness of
the government and repression, and it points to the dominance of the Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), intelligence, Khamenei and their loyalists.
It is incumbent on human rights organizations, the United Nations, and the
International Criminal Court (ICC) to conduct rigorous investigations and bring
those who have committed and continue to commit these crimes - and more likely
who currently serve in high positions in Iran - to justice. Calls to bring
these people to justice are increasing. No individual or institution that
commits crimes against humanity should live comfortably without being held
accountable.
Finally, it is incumbent on the Congress and everyone who wanted to be on the
right side of justice to follow up with the following points mentioned in the
recent Congressional resolution:
"1. condemn the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for the 1988
massacre, and for denying the evidence of this manifest set of crimes against
humanity;
2. urge the Administration and United States allies to publicly condemn the
massacre, and pressure the Government of Iran to provide detailed information
to the families of the victims about their loved ones and their final resting
places; and
3. urge the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in
Iran and the United Nations Human Rights Council to create a Commission of
Inquiry to fully investigate the massacre and to gather evidence and identify
the names 15 and roles of specific perpetrators with a view towards bringing
them to justice."
(source: NCR-Iran)
BANGLADESH:
4 to die for murdering cattle trader
A Barguna court on Wednesday sentenced 4 people to death penalty and 2 others
to life-term imprisonment for killing a cattle trader 4 years back.
The court also sentenced the convicts to 3 years in jail and fined Tk100,000
each in another charge.
The 4 who were give death penalty are Shahidul Islam Chowkidar, Barek
Chowkidar, Bashir Matubbar and Moazzem.
People who have been jailed for life are Abdur Rob Chowkidar and Mozibur.
Additional District and Sessions Judge Muhammad Abu Taher announced the verdict
after cross-checking 19 witnesses and examining documents.
According to the prosecution, Naya Mia was thrashed to death on April 10, 2012
when he was returning home at Cholavanga village. The murderers also snatched
Tk70,000 from him.
Md Nasir Uddin, son of Naya Mia, a resident of Chalbhanga village under Amtali
upzila, filed a case with Amtali police station accusing the 6 people.
After the announcement of the verdict, Nasir said: "My father has been killed
by the hoodlums. We are happy with the verdict. We are also demanding speedy
execution of the verdict."
Defence counsel Kamal Kanti Das, however, said they were not happy with the
verdict and would challenge the conviction in High Court.
(source: Dhaka Tribuine)
PAKISTAN:
Pakistani court upholds death penalty for mentally ill man
Pakistan's Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the death penalty against a mentally
ill man convicted of murder, overturning a previous appeal and a court decision
staying his execution, an international rights group said.
The court dismissed Imdad Ali's appeal, saying a large proportion of prisoners
suffer from mental illness and they cannot let everyone go, the Reprieve group
said in a statement.
It urged Pakistan to spare Ali, saying his execution would be a violation of
both Pakistani and international laws. Harriet McCulloch, deputy director of
the death penalty team at Reprieve, said it was "indisputable that Imdad
suffers from serious mental illness."
Sara Bilal, a lawyer at Justice Project Pakistan, said authorities can soon set
a new date for Ali's execution. He has been on death row since he was convicted
in 2001. Bilal says he has been diagnosed with schizophrenia.
Ali was due to be executed on Sept. 20, after Pakistan's president rejected a
clemency request, but a last-minute Supreme Court decision temporarily stayed
his execution. Bilal said she sent a new clemency petition to the president
from Ali's family.
4 UN human rights experts have also urged Pakistan to halt the execution. Agnes
Callamard, Special Rapporteur on executions; Juan E. Mendez, Special Rapporteur
on torture; Monica Pinto, Special Rapporteur for judicial independence; and
Dainius Puras, Special Rapporteur on the right to physical and mental health,
said Ali could be executed within a week.
(source: alarabiya.com)
MALAYSIA:
A Man In Malaysia Was Just Sentenced To Death For Selling Weed
A man living near Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia was just found guilty of trafficking
cannabis. As a result, he's been given a death sentence. There have been
debates in the country recently about its harsh marijuana laws. But so far, no
changes to those rules have been made.
The Details
A 32-year-old man named Ibrahim Musa Rifa'l was given a guilty verdict this
week after he was caught trafficking cannabis. Back in April of 2014, Ibrahim
was discovered with 9.63 kg of marijuana. That's a little more than 21 pounds.
After being caught with the weed, he was charged with 2 separate counts of
cannabis trafficking. The 1st was for trafficking in 8.18 kg of marijuana. And
the 2nd was for trafficking in 0.72 kg of marijuana.
The man's trial officially began on April 4 of this year. And now, at the
conclusion of the trial, he was found guilty of both charges. The judge gave
Ibrahim the death sentence.
ROLL-UH-BOWL
According to sources in Malaysia, Ibrahim was sentenced according to the
country's Dangerous Drugs Act of 1952. According to that set of laws, cannabis
trafficking comes with a mandatory death penalty.
Time To Rethink The Global War On Drugs
Ibrahim's death sentence once again raises important questions about the global
war on drugs. Earlier this year, the UN hosted the 2016 UN General Assembly
Special Session, and the primary focus was drug policy. Before the assembly
met, the Global Commission on Drug Policy issued a statement urging the UN to
call for an end to the global war on drugs.
The debate about the war on drugs - and especially about anti-cannabis laws -
is becoming more widespread around the world. And that debate has been heating
up in Malaysia, too.
In February of this year, prominent health care officials and lawmakers sparred
over the country's anti-pot laws. A well-known doctor named Nadiah Norudin
spoke out against a proposal to decriminalize marijuana. She claimed that more
relaxed cannabis laws would be dangerous to children and young people.
But lawmaker Syed Rosli Jamalulail quickly fought back in the media. He said
that Norudin's statements weren't backed up by data. He also accused her of
trying to demonize medical cannabis so that it wouldn't compete with
prescription meds.
Final Hit
In any case, these most recent developments in Malaysia should be a wake-up
call to the world. Sentencing a person to death for selling cannabis is the
most extreme example of the widespread harm caused by the global war on drugs.
(source: Green Rush Daily)
ZIMBABWE:
Mnangagwa taken to court by death row men
The Constitutional Court will this Wednesday hear the challenge by Farai
Lawrence Ndlovu & Wisdom Gochera versus the Minister of Justice Legal and
Parliamentary Affairs, Emmerson Mnangagwa and the Attorney General Prince
Machaya, on the constitutionality of the death penalty.
In the applicants' founding Affidavit Ndlovu who is the 1st applicant is
currently on death row and is incarcerated at Chikurubi Maximum Prison, his
prison number is 662/ 14, while the 2nd applicant Gochera is also on death row
at the same prison, his number is 649/ 13. The applicants were convicted and
sentenced for murder before the new constitution come into effect and are both
awaiting execution.
The 1st applicant was convicted of murder by Justice Misheck Cheda in the High
Court of Bulawayo on 24 May 2012, his automatic appeal under SC36/ 14 was
thrown out of the Supreme Court on 8 May 2014.
The 2nd applicant was convicted of murder, by Justice Benjamin Paradza on 27
July 2002, and his automatic appeal was also dismissed by the Chief Justice
with the concurrence of the Deputy Chief Justice and Gawunza JA under judgement
number SC33/ 05 on 6 September 2005.
The 2 applicants, represented by prominent lawyer Tendai Biti who is also
People's Democratic Party leader, are challenging that the new constitution of
Zimbabwe provides them with the right to life under section 48 of the
Constitution of Zimbabwe, therefore cannot be executed now.
In the court papers, the case which is cited as Ndlovu & Another V Minister of
Justice & Another, the applicants made it clear that they are not contending
that their convictions and sentencing were unconstitutional or otherwise
unlawful when they were imposed. They however, contend that the conditions have
changed since the new constitution entered into force in 2013.
They further contend that the old law in which they were convicted does not
apply to them as it is not in conformity with the new constitution, and that
there cannot be any execution of any prisoner or any death sentence in Zimbabwe
until law envisaged under section 48 (2) of the constitution has been passed.
The state however, argues that the law that there cannot be any execution in
Zimbabwe is not there in the statutes.
The state (the respondent) through the Attorney General's Office maintains that
the applicants are misguided. In its heads of argument the respondent states
that when the constitution comes into commencement the rights guaranteed in the
constitution under chapter 4 being the declaration of rights under which the
right to life is sanctioned, come into commencement on the publication day.
"The right to life guaranteed under s48 (1) of the constitution was therefore
effective from the date of publication of the current constitution which was 22
May 2013. Nowhere is it stated in the text that the constitution shall have a
retrospective effect," argues the state.
The state's argument is therefore that the applicants cannot argue that the
provisions of the new constitution cover them as they were both convicted and
sentenced before the publication date. In other words section 48 (1) of the
constitution does not render unconstitutional or unlawful the imposition of the
death penalty upon both applicants at the relevant times.
Human life is God given. No one has the right to take away another person's
life. Democracy and the right to human dignity does not being one sided and
turning a blind eye the rights of others. In that regard the state further
argue that applicants need not to lose sight that by committing murder they
also violated an equally important right, the right to life.
"The applicants failed to respect the right to life and human dignity as they
applied to other persons, and democracy in a open and democratic society based
on human rights, dignity, equality, and freedom demands that they face the
consequences of their actions.
"The new constitution cannot apply in retrospect in favour of the applicants,
but clearly apply to persons who were convicted after the publication date as
explicitly provided for under part II, section 3 (1) (b) of the sixth
schedule," added the state.
The new constitution provides in section 48 (2) (e) that such persons on death
row to qualify to have their capital punishment commuted to life sentences need
to apply to the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe.
According to the applicants' papers, the constitutional court will therefore
consider if the new Constitution saves and preserves the death penalty or,
rather, whether those persons that have not been executed can be, executed
before the law envisaged in Section 48 (2) has been passed. At the end of the
day, the Court will have to consider whether or not, as argued by the State,
the Constitution applies retrospectively in respect of convicted persons
awaiting execution.
(source: zimnews.net)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list