[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Mon Jun 27 15:36:31 CDT 2016
June 27
LIBYA:
Kadhafi son's new lawyers urge ICC to drop case
New lawyers representing the son of slain Libyan leader Moamer Kadhafi
announced Monday they will ask the International Criminal Court to quash the
case against him as he has now been tried and convicted by a Libyan court.
Seif al-Islam, who has been in a 5 1/2-year legal tug-of-war between the ICC
and Tripoli, is wanted by the tribunal in The Hague to face charges of crimes
against humanity relating to the bloody repression of the 2011 uprising that
toppled his father.
Seif, 44, has been held in the northern hilltop stronghold of Zintan since his
arrest in November 2011.
Last year, in a move heavily criticised by the UN, he was sentenced to death by
a Libyan court for trying to put down the deadly revolt that saw Moamer
Kadhafi's 40-year rule end in his own murder.
Now he has appointed his own defence team for the first time, after his earlier
lawyers were assigned by the ICC.
The new lawyers told journalists in The Hague that they will ask the ICC's
judges to scrap the case, basing their argument on the so-called principle of
"double jeopardy".
"The reality is that a trial has taken place. He has been tried and convicted
in Libya. It's a clear principle of law that one cannot be tried twice for the
same offence," veteran defence lawyer Karim Khan told a press conference.
"The court will receive a filing from us, the lawyers of Seif al-Islam in due
course, seeking to declare the case inadmissible," Khan said.
"The ICC should not be a substitute for local courts, but base itself on the
principle of complementarity," Libyan lawyer Khaled Zaidy added.
- Possible amnesty -
Zaidy last met with Seif in prison in late 2015 and said he is in regular
contact and receiving instructions from him. "Healthwise he is rather good," he
said, but Seif had been thinking a lot about the situation in Libya.
Despite the death sentence, Seif may benefit from a proposed general amnesty
law in Libya that his family had been assured "will be applicable to all Libyan
nationals without exception," Zaidy said.
Seif and 8 others were sentenced to death by a Tripoli court in July last year.
They included Kadhafi's former intelligence chief Abdullah Senussi, who saw the
ICC drop a similar case against him.
Seif was not in court during the Tripoli hearings, but was able to testify via
videolink from Zintan.
His legal team also insisted he is being held a Libyan government jail run by
the justice ministry and that rumours he was in the hands of Zintani militias
were "totally groundless". In the past the militias refused to hand him over to
Tripoli and the ICC.
Asked whether he believed whether Seif received a fair hearing before being
handed the death penalty, Khan said the outcome and questions over the Libyan
process -- which was criticised for not meeting international standards -- were
"legally irrelevant" to the case before the ICC.
"There's been a trial, there's been a process, there's been a conviction and he
is still in custody. How on earth is that not double jeopardy?" Khan asked.
The Western-backed overthrow of Kadhafi-'s iron-fisted rule in 2011 plunged
Libya into chaos, with rival rebel forces seizing as much territory as they
could.
Now IS jihadist groups have taken advantage of the upheaval to establish a
presence in the northern African country.
(source: Yahoo News)
ETHIOPIA:
Kidnapped Brit Enters 3rd Year on Ethiopia's Death Row
A British father of 3 who was kidnapped and rendered to Ethiopia will this week
enter his 3rd year of illegal detention in the country, where he is held under
sentence of death.
Andargachew 'Andy' Tsege, from London, was kidnapped by Ethiopian forces on the
23rd of June 2014 as he transited through an airport in Yemen. He was forcibly
taken to Ethiopia, and has been held in the country ever since. Mr Tsege is a
prominent figure in Ethiopian opposition politics, and he has previously spoken
out about human rights abuses in Ethiopia, including at the US Congress and
European Parliament. He is held under a sentence of death that was imposed in
absentia in 2009, whilst he was living in London.
Throughout the first 2 years of his detention, the Ethiopian authorities have
limited Mr Tsege's access to his family and UK consular officials. Last week,
UK Foreign Office documents relating to the case were made public, showing how
throughout 2015, Ethiopian officials repeatedly refused to answer British
requests on Mr Tsege's case. In a record of 1 conversation between Foreign
Secretary Philip Hammond MP and his Ethiopian counterpart, Dr Tedros Adanhom, 1
year after Mr Tsege's kidnap, Mr Hammond complained about Ethiopia's "repeated
failure to deliver on our basic requests", saying "people were asking why we
had a substantial bilateral relationship but were not able to resolve this".
The documents also show that Ethiopian officials have repeatedly told UK
diplomats that there is no possibility of a legal process for Mr Tsege in
Ethiopia - raising serious doubts over an announcement by Mr Hammond, made
earlier this month, that Ethiopia's government had promised 'legal access' for
Mr Tsege.
Reprieve has urged the Foreign Office to request Mr Tsege's release, and his
return to the UK - a call that has already been made by the UN Working Group on
Arbitrary Detention, the European Parliament, and several MPs.
Torture of political prisoners is common in Ethiopia, and there are fears for
Mr Tsege's mental and physical wellbeing.
Commenting, Maya Foa, director of the death penalty team at human rights
organization Reprieve - which is assisting Mr Tsege's family - said: "It is
heart-breaking that Andy Tsege, and his young family in London, are today
forced to mark the 3rd year of his illegal detention in Ethiopia. If the last 2
years have shown anything in his case, it's that there is no chance of justice
for Andy while the Ethiopian government has him in their clutches. Enough is
enough - the Foreign Secretary must demand Andy's immediate return to the UK."
(source: Reprieve is a UK-based human rights organization that uses the law to
enforce the human rights of prisoners, from death row to Guantanamo Bay.)
IRAN:
Situation of Iran's Minorities Raised at 6th World Congress Against the Death
Penalty
ECPM (Ensemble contre la peine de mort) convened the 6th World Congress Against
the Death Penalty on 21-23 June 2016 in Oslo, Norway, to discuss ways forward
in the abolition of the death penalty. The event gathered around 1000
participants (ministers, diplomats, parliamentarians, academics, lawyers and
members of civil society), among which Ms Monireh Shirani (Balochistan Human
Rights Group, Sweden) who presented her view on the state of death penalty
among migrants and minorities in Iran. Baloch, Kurds, Ahwazi Arabs, Azerbaijani
Turks and Turkmen are being systematically discriminated against and have less
access to legal resources to defend themselves than the rest of the population,
which results in minorities being the most threatened by executions. Iran is
currently among the top countries when it comes to the number of executions in
the past 5 years.
Below is the speech of Ms Monireh Shirani:
Ethnic minorities have long suffered discrimination as they have been viewed
with suspicion and considered outsiders or foreign conspirators. The Amnesty
report for 2015-16 states that "Iran's disadvantaged ethnic groups, Ahwazi
Arabs, Azerbaijani Turks, Baluchis, Kurds and Turkmen, continued to report that
the state authorities systematically discriminated against them, particularly
in employment, housing, access to political office, and the exercise of
cultural, civil and political rights."
Executions are part of the state policy in dealing with the ethnic minorities,
to punish any cultural or political act. The large-scale executions of
political and ideological dissidents have resulted in Iran being in the top
countries when it comes to number of executions during the last 5 years. Other
reasons are that the ethnic minorities also have less access to the legal
resources needed to defend themselves due to a discriminatory system, poverty,
marginalization and living in militarized zone.
There is a clear over representation of the Ahwazi arabs, Baloch and Kurds on
the death row and in executions. Iran executed nearly 1000 prisoners last year,
the majority of these executions were prisoners' sentence to death for
drug-related offenses. Under Iran's current drug laws possession of 30 grams of
heroin or cocaine would qualify for the death penalty.
Iran views these number as a great victory and defends its acts because they
claim that they are in a war on drugs. Some of those who were convicted for
drug related offenses were actually political dissidents. In Balochistan entire
adult male populations from singled out villages have been executed, the regime
fully admit to this and refers to the war on drugs and drug trafficking as
crimes which have to be met with mass execution. Some of them were executed
without trials others had trials conducted behind closed doors, before biased
judges and in absence of legal representations.
One can wonder how this is possible on a large scale.
Well, charges of act on national security and drug related offenses, are among
the charges routinely used on ethnic minorities, fall within the jurisdiction
of the Revolutionary court which is one for the strictest Judicial bodies.
The Revolutionary court consists of essentially closed meetings, the right of
defense is ignored. The accused is not informed of his or her right to adequate
defense. The right to assistance of interpretation of the proceedings in his or
her mother tongue as Farsi is not the mother tongue of the ethnic minorities
not given.
The family is prohibited to participate in the deliberations of the case. The
courts is by law obliged to inform the accused of the verdict by sending a copy
of the decision to his place of residence and from that time there is a 20 day
appeal possibility. The Revolutionary court fails to follow its legal
obligations and violates the accused's rights, because they don't send a copy,
the family is not notified in time.
The accused are usually moved to different locations, in different regions as a
strategy to isolate the accused. This places a challenge on the prisoner
because it makes it hard for the family to visit and give adequate support.
In Iran there are thousands of minors in prison, often sentenced to death while
underage and executed when coming to age. On the 27th of April Mohammad
Sanchouli 22 years old was executed in Balochistan. He was arrested and
convicted when he was 17 years old and spent 5 years in prison.
The obstacles confronted by minorities facing the death penalty is on the
individual level impossible to tackle. The strategies and the ambiguity of the
system is difficult for the individual and his/her family to overcome. Rather
than finding reasonable evidence for the commission of a crime, judges
generally rely on confessions, which have often been coerced through physical
and psychological torture. Iranian television continue to broadcast
self-incriminating testimonies of ethnic minority detainees even before their
opening trial, undermining their fundamental rights of defendants to be
considered innocent until proven guilty.
Last year in Ahwaz 5 prisoners were arrested in April and on in June they were
brought in front of state TV by the Ministry of Information to make public
confessions. These public confessions are frequent used when lack of evidence.
For example in 2012 in Balochistan ten people were arrested for an
assassination.
Confessions were broadcast on state TV. Some of them received long sentenced
others were sentenced to death. A few years after the security forces arrested
another 18 people for the same crime for which the people in 2012 had been
tried and convicted for.
Most of the minority prisoners have been arbitrary arrested. We have cases of
security forces raiding homes and arresting people without warrants. In Ahwaz
last year more than 75 people were arrested after a demonstration and for
months their whereabouts were unknown to their families.
"Waging war against God" (Moharebeh) enmity against God is one of the leading
charges used by the Iranian regime to justify the inhuman executions of ethnic
minorities groups in Iran. Other common charges against minorities sentences to
death are charges of corruption on earth (Mofsid fil-arz), drug related
offences and acts against national security. Another vulnerable group is
religious minorities such as the Bahai who are also usually charged with
espionage and acts against national security.
A few weeks ago, the Iranian government executed 5 Kurdish prisoners in the
northwestern city of Urmia. They were hung publicly on charges of "conspiring
against the Islamic Republic of Iran". They were human rights activists who
used to document violations by security forces against civilians in the Kurdish
city of Urmia. The regime is quick to state examples by using public hangings
to discourage any form of activity in the regions. Many of these hangings take
up to 20 minutes, a slow and painful death. The body is often left for a time
before removed from the scene.
We the diaspora and the civil society living outside Iran depend on the United
Nations as a tool to challenge the ongoing oppression in Iran. The UN's office
on drugs and crime, the anti-drug agency has a multi-million dollar funding
package, which includes EU money, for Iran's counter narcotics trafficking
program. Iran's war on drugs have not resulted in the population being less
addicted to drugs but rather resulted in mass executions of ethnic minorities.
The international community needs to raise concern over the lack of the
administration of justice in this war on drugs.
This money should be conditional and the UN should demand that the capital
punishment for drug related offense not be used, put pressure on the country to
give the accused a fair trial and access to judicial system. The UN should at
least demand that the Special rapporteurs be given access to the country as a
condition.
The strategy is to continue to work against the death penalty. To work with
wide networks of law makers, lawyers, NGO's and activists to create new
strategies towards universal abolition of the death penalty.
Other tactics to challenge the status quo is Social media and media. Iran does
not expose its execution records, it's quite hard to obtain full court records.
Bridging the information gap is key. In Zahedan prison in April 8 men were
executed. We still don't know the full identity of five of them. The civil
society outside as well as in side Iran plays an important role in creating
records and bring the information out. The state TV often dehumanize ethnic
minorities in national media, promoting a discourse of uncivilized, barbaric,
drug lord and illiterate people living in dangerous areas. People in the
central part never see the regions of the minorities and so the only
information that they have of us is the state's portrayal. That's why media
coverage to is important so that the state narrative can be challenged.
(source: unpo.org)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list