[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----OHIO, IND., OKLA., CALIF.
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Sat Jun 18 08:36:46 CDT 2016
June 18
OHIO:
Trumbull prosecutor to judge: Strike Danny Lee Hill filing
The Trumbull County Prosecutor's Office has asked a visiting judge to strike
the entire 419-page document filed this week by attorneys for Danny Lee Hill
that ask for the judge to grant him a new trial.
Hill, 49, is on death row for killing Raymond Fife, 12, in September 1985 in a
wooded area along Palmyra Road Southeast.
Visiting Judge Patricia A. Cosgrove recently granted attorneys for Hill the
opportunity to ask the judge for a new trial based on bite-mark evidence used
at Hill's trial that Hill's attorneys said has been proven unreliable.
Hill's attorneys "filed a 47-page motion augmented with 20 exhibits on June 13,
2016," the prosecutor's office said in Thursday's filing. "This motion totals
more than 400 pages, most of which have absolutely NOTHING to do with bite
marks detected on Raymod Fife's lifeless body 30 years ago," the prosecutor's
motion says.
"The state submits that the bulk of [Hill's] motion is so far beyond the scope
of this court's [permission] that it should be stricken immediately."
As an example, Hill's filing includes an affidavit questioning whether Hill was
too intellectually disabled to be interviewed by police, a question that "has
been litigated and relitigated ad nauseam in the state and federal courts for
30 years," the prosecutor's office filing says.
"The defense here makes a brazen attempt to taint other heretofore
uncontroverted evidence - separate and apart from the bite-mark evidence
already at issue - which was accepted by a 3-judge panel and affirmed
repeatedly as sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction on multiple counts,
not just the oral rape of the victim, and the lawfully imposed death penalty."
The prosecutor's filing says a phone conference scheduled for Tuesday morning
would be premature without the judge first reviewing the prosecutor's formal
response to Hill's request for a new trial, to be filed later, as well as the
entire case file, record and proceedings of the 3-judge panel that convicted
Hill and imposed the death penalty.
"As has been discussed in previous filings, the considerable amount of other
evidence positively identifying [Hill] as 1 of only 2 assailants in the
systematic destruction of this child precludes the need for a new trial. He is
no innocent man. The record and facts show he will always remain guilty."
In a separate filing, the prosecutor's office asks Judge Cosgrove to set a date
for the prosecutor to file a response to Hill's motion for a new trial.
(source: vindy.com)
INDIANA:
Psychiatrists to evaluate man accused of killing IMPD officer
Calling his public defenders "very disrespectful, evil and unprofessional," the
man accused of killing an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department officer
in 2014 once again asked a judge to allow him to represent himself in the death
penalty case he faces.
Major Davis, 27, appeared in court Friday morning to ask a judge to allow him
to fire his public defenders, Eric Koselke and Ray Casanova. Davis is charged
with murder in the shooting death of officer Perry Renn.
Yet Marion Superior Court Judge Marc Rothenberg warned that a death penalty
case is unlike other cases, and said the court must determine whether Davis is
competent to both stand trial and represent himself.
Rothenberg appointed a forensic psychiatrist and a psychologist and plans to
appoint another psychiatrist to evaluate Davis. After that, he said, he could
determine whether Davis should proceed without an attorney.
"They are not my attorneys," Davis said. "I am asking you today to fire them."
Davis' attorneys presented the court with an affidavit from a doctor that said
Davis suffers from "paranoia and delusions." Davis disputed the doctor's
report.
Rothenberg noted that the doctors he appointed are not connected to the defense
or the prosecutors.
Davis has repeatedly asked to dismiss his public defender, and has filed a
series of requests with the court against the advice of his attorneys. In July,
he asked for a speedy trial and for his murder charge to be dismissed without
authorization from his attorneys. Rothenberg denied those requests because they
weren't signed by the attorneys.
Davis in April told Rothenberg he wasn't getting along with his attorneys, and
asked to represent himself. The judge said he would not grant the request until
it was properly filed.
The judge scheduled a hearing on Aug. 2 to take place after the doctors have
evaluated Davis.
(source: Indianapolis Star)
OKLAHOMA:
Oklahoma County jurors decide against death penalty in 'Cathouse' murders
Jurors decided Friday against the death penalty for the last 2 men convicted of
the 2009 "Cathouse" slayings.
Instead, the Oklahoma County jury chose life in prison without the possibility
of parole as punishment for all the murders. Jurors deliberated about 10 hours
Thursday night and Friday morning.
"2 incredibly violent men, and dangerous men, are going to die in prison. And
that's what this jury decided," Assistant District Attorney Gayland Gieger told
reporters afterward. "If you're going to commit these kind of crimes, be
prepared to spend the rest of your life, and die, in prison. ... These 2 men
will never, ever see the light of day."
Monday night, jurors found Denny Edward Phillips, 38, of Salina, and Russell
Lee Hogshooter, 38, of Oklahoma City, guilty of 6 counts of 1st-degree murder
and 1 count of conspiracy. The men were convicted in the deaths of an Oklahoma
City drug dealer and 3 women.
Get complete coverage of OKC's homicides
Prosecutors charged the men with 6 murder counts because 2 victims were
pregnant.
On Tuesday, the jury chose a punishment of 35 years in prison for the
conspiracy count.
The men remained stone-faced Friday as District Judge Timothy Henderson
announced their punishments. They didn't speak to reporters as they were
escorted out of the courtroom in handcuffs.
During the trial, prosecutors said Phillips was the "puppet master" behind a
plan to rob and kill the drug dealer, Casey Mark Barrientos, 32. Phillips was
accused of directing Hogshooter and 2 other men to go to the south Oklahoma
City drug house early Nov. 9, 2009, to carry out the plan.
The women at the house, Brooke Phillips, 22, of Moore; Milagros Barrera, 22, of
Mustang; and Jennifer Lynn Ermey, 25, of Edmond; were killed to eliminate them
as witnesses, prosecutors said. Brooke Phillips and Barrera were pregnant.
Prosecutors said the victims were stabbed, shot and their bodies were set on
fire.
The case entered the national spotlight because Brooke Phillips, who wasn't
related to Denny Phillips, was a prostitute on "Cathouse," an HBO reality show
about a legal brothel in Nevada.
Denny Phillips and Hogshooter denied any involvement. The 2 other men involved
in the killings, David Allen Tyner, 34, of Locust Grove, and Jonathan Allen
Cochran, 37, of Oklahoma City, already have pleaded guilty to the murders and
testified for prosecutors during the trial.
Tyner is serving 6 consecutive life sentences without the possibility of
parole. He accepted a plea deal to avoid the death penalty.
Cochran received a 25-year sentence as part of his plea agreement.
Tyner testified Denny Phillips, a "war chief" in the Indian Brotherhood Gang,
threatened to kill his family if he didn't participate in the plan. Tyner
admitted to shooting each victim except Brooke Phillips.
Hogshooter was accused of attacking and torturing Brooke Phillips and then
setting the house on fire.
Defense attorneys contended Tyner was the one who orchestrated the plan.
The trial lasted 5 weeks.
(source: The Oklahoman)
CALIFORNIA:
California Voters to Choose Between Abolishing the Death Penalty or Speeding Up
Executions ---- A measure to abolish the death penalty has made it to the
November ballot to compete with a measure aiming to increase execution rates.
An initiative that would repeal the death penalty and replace it with life
imprisonment without possibility of parole has qualified for the November
ballot, Secretary of State Alex Padilla announced today.
The initiative would apply retroactively to persons already sentenced to death.
It would also require prisoners serving life sentences without the possibility
of parole for murder to work while in prison.
What backers dubbed as the "Justice That Works Act" required valid signatures
from 365,880 registered voters -- 5 % of the total votes cast for governor in
the 2014 general election -- to qualify for the ballot, according to Padilla.
Passage of the initiative would result in a net reduction in state and local
government costs of potentially around $150 million annually within a few
years, according to an analysis conducted by the Legislative Analyst's Office
and Department of Finance.
"Because of all the problems with the death penalty, not a single person has
been executed here in the last 10 years. Nonetheless, Californians continue to
pay for it in many ways," said initiative proponent Mike Farrell, a longtime
death penalty opponent best known for his portrayal of Army Capt. B. J.
Hunnicutt on the classic 1972-83 CBS comedy "M.A.S.H."
"Whether you look at the death penalty from a taxpayer, a criminal justice or a
civil rights perspective, what is clear is that it fails in every respect. We
have to do better in California."
An initiative aimed at expediting executions is alsso expected to appear on the
November ballot.
"Justice is not easy, and it is certainly not gentle. But justice denied is not
justice," said Kermit Alexander, the former NFL player who is the proponent of
the Death Penalty Reform and Savings Act. Alexander's mother, sister and two
nephews were murdered in 1984.
"We the people of California have consecutively and systematically voted to
reinstate and preserve the use of capital punishment despite the efforts of
those who refuse to carry out an execution."
Passage of the Death Penalty Reform and Savings Act would result in increased
state costs that could be in the tens of millions of dollars annually for
several years related to direct appeals and habeas corpus proceedings, with the
fiscal impact on such costs being unknown in the longer run.
There could also be potential state correctional savings in the tens of
millions of dollars annually, according to an analysis conducted by the
Legislative Analyst's Office and Department of Finance.
In the unlikely event both measures were approved by voters, the measure with
more yes votes would go into effect.
A measure to repeal the death penalty on the November 2012 ballot was rejected
by a 52 % - 48 % margin.
(source: patch.com)
*****************
Measure to repeal state's death penalty qualifies for Nov. ballot
Californians will vote in November on whether to repeal the state's long-unused
death penalty law, four years after a similar measure was defeated by 4
percentage points.
Secretary of State Alex Padilla announced Friday that the initiative to
eliminate capital punishment and replace it with a sentence of life in prison
without parole had received more than the 365,880 valid signatures it needed to
qualify for the ballot.
The measure is likely to compete with an initiative sponsored by prosecutors
that seeks to speed up executions by requiring a large group of defense lawyers
to accept capital cases, and by requiring the state Supreme Court to decide all
death penalty appeals within 5 years. Supporters of that measure said they have
submitted nearly 600,000 signatures to election officials, who are in the
process of verifying them.
If both measures pass, the one with the larger majority would become law.
Backers of the initiative to repeal the death penalty cite an estimate by the
Legislature's fiscal analyst that it would save the state $150 million a year
in costs of prison housing and protracted court appeals. They also say opinion
polls show a decline in public support for capital punishment since November
2012, when an initiative to end the death penalty was defeated by 52 to 48 %.
California has the nation's largest death row, with nearly 750 prisoners, but
has executed only 13 since reinstating the death penalty in 1977. After the
state's last execution, in January 2006, a federal judge ruled that flaws in
the state's lethal injection procedures and prison staff training had created
an undue risk of a botched and agonizing execution.
Prison officials have revamped their procedures several times since then but
have encountered further obstacles in federal and state courts and have not
found a source of injection drugs since the last U.S. manufacturer stopped
making them. The state has settled a lawsuit by crime victims' groups by
agreeing to switch from the 3-drug combination used in past executions to a
single, lethal dose of a powerful barbiturate.
(source: San Francisco Chronicle)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list