[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----VA., GA., OHIO
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Tue Apr 12 22:53:30 CDT 2016
April 12
VIRGINIA:
Virginia wants to hide the names of lethal injection drug suppliers. Here's how
that is going in other states.
Virginia may soon become the latest state to shield the identities of companies
that supply drugs for lethal injections, a move Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) paints
as necessary if the state wants to continue carrying out executions.
This comes as the secrecy surrounding lethal injections is growing, even as the
number of executions and death sentences in the United States continues to
decline. For those states trying to carry out death sentences, struggles to
obtain drugs and difficulties finding suppliers have led to laws that hide the
names of these suppliers, which in turn prompted court challenges.
Take Arkansas, Missouri and Ohio, 3 states that illustrate the current
environment for officials still looking to carry out executions - and offer a
glimpse of what could lay ahead for Virginia if it adopts the new legislation.
[The proposal in Virginia could lead to court challenges, experts say]
These 3 states are in different places when it comes to capital punishment.
Arkansas is seeking to resume executions after a decade-long break, while Ohio
is an active executioner that will go at least 3 years between lethal
injections as it tries to find drugs. Missouri is among the most active
death-penalty states these days, joining Texas and Florida to account for most
of the country's executions since 2013.
In these places, court fights over secrecy are being waged that have, in some
cases, postponed executions or resulted in rulings against the states.
The fights over secrecy
Arkansas has not executed an inmate since 2005, but last fall authorities said
they were ready to resume lethal injections and began setting execution dates.
A judge there halted the 1st scheduled execution less than 2 weeks before it
was scheduled to occur as inmates challenged state legislation that let
Arkansas hide the names of the companies that supply drugs for executions. Last
week, the Arkansas Supreme Court said it would hear oral arguments in the
challenge.
In Missouri, a judge ruled last month that the state "knowingly violated"
public records laws "by refusing to disclose records that would reveal the
suppliers of lethal injection drugs." The state had been challenged on multiple
fronts, including in a lawsuit from the Associated Press and other media
organizations pushing back against the secrecy provisions, and a judge ordered
them to release their records identifying the suppliers.
The state has not filed an appeal in that case so far and still has time to
file an appeal or other motions, according to a spokeswoman for the Missouri
attorney general's office.
[Executions declined last year in the U.S. The country still put more inmates
to death than most other nations]
Meanwhile, a shield law in Ohio is about to be debated in a federal courtroom.
Under this law - signed by Ohio Gov. John Kasich, a Republican presidential
candidate, in December 2014 - the state can hide the identities of anyone who
compounds or supplies drugs used in lethal injections.
Last year, District Judge Gregory L. Frost dismissed a lawsuit challenging this
law, writing that just because the death-row inmates "want or need information
does not invariably entitle them to it under the Constitution," adding: "Not
all oversight requires absolute transparency."
The inmates are challenging the dismissal in federal appeals court, and oral
arguments in this case are scheduled for next week.
Increased secrecy - and experts say more is coming
As states struggle to obtain lethal drugs due to an ongoing shortage sparked by
European objections to capital punishment, laws shielding the identities of the
suppliers will probably become more widespread, said Franklin E. Zimring, a law
professor at the University of California at Berkeley.
"The shield law is an attempt to create circumstances in which continuity of
supply is going to be possible," Zimring said. "Once the idea of a shield law
takes hold, then anybody who is suffering from these issues will go after it."
More than a dozen states have some kind of secrecy statutes and others have
secrecy regulations, said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death
Penalty Information Center. While these statutes largely exist to keep the
identities of the executioners shielded, states have been expanding them and
arguing that drug suppliers are part of the execution teams and should also be
hidden, he said.
"States that have the longest history of aggressively seeking to carry out
executions are the ones who've also been the most aggressive in attempting to
conduct secret executions," Dunham said.
While some lower courts have rejected these secrecy arguments, appellate courts
have reversed these rulings and not forced them to identify suppliers, he said.
So far, no higher court has forced a state to release the hidden identity of a
drug supplier, Dunham said.
Many states are still struggling to obtain lethal injection drugs
This drug shortage means that even as states fight to defend their secrecy
provisions, some are still unable to carry out executions.
Ohio carried out at least 1 execution each year between 2001 and 2014, but
officials there say they will not execute another inmate until next year at the
earliest. The last execution in Ohio was in January 2014, when the state's
lethal injection of Dennis McGuire - who admitted to raping and murdering a
pregnant newlywed - stretched on for nearly 25 minutes as he struggled and
gasped. (That was the 1st of 3 executions that went awry that year.)
State officials revamped Ohio's execution protocols as the state sought lethal
drugs. Authorities have delayed Ohio's scheduled lethal injections multiple
times, and the state's next execution is (currently) set for January 2017 - a
schedule meant to give officials "additional time necessary to secure the
required execution drugs," the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
said in a statement last fall.
[Ohio tried and failed to execute an inmate. The Ohio Supreme Court says it can
try again.]
This shortage is also behind the current proposal in Virginia. Until 2010, most
executions in the United States were carried out using a 3-drug combination
similar to what Virginia uses, a method that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme
Court as constitutional. But a drug shortage sparked by European objections to
capital punishment interrupted the supply of these drugs, so states began
shifting to a series of new combinations and protocols.
In Virginia and elsewhere, this shortage prompted officials to debate reviving
older methods to continue carrying out death sentences. Before McAuliffe
proposed hiding the identities of drug suppliers, he was presented with a bill
that would have made the electric chair the mandated backup method of execution
in Virginia.
Virginia does possess some of the drugs needed to carry out an execution, but
not all of them. In an odd turn of events, a state considering hiding the
identities of its drug supplier obtained chemicals from a state that has
already shielded its own. Among the drugs Virginia possesses are two vials of
pentobarbital obtained from Texas last year, both of which expire this month.
Texas officials said they gave Virginia these drugs but, due to state law,
could not identify the supplier.
"Only Lewis Carroll could write the modern history of lethal injection and
capital punishment in America," Zimring said.
(source: Washington Post)
GEORGIA----execution
Georgia executes Kenneth Fults for 1996 murder
Georgia has executed 47-year-old Kenneth Fults for the 1996 murder of his
neighbor.
Fults was killed by lethal injection at 7:37 p.m. at the Georgia Diagnostic and
Classification Center in Jackson.
There was no one in the execution chamber for Fults, so he had no final words
for witnesses from the media and the state who had gathered. But he ended the
prayer offered by the chaplain with, "Amen."
Kenneth Fults, 47, was sentenced to die for murdering Cathy Bounds in 1996.
A few minutes after the execution drugs had begun to flow, he twice looked at
the IV inserted into his right arm. Moments later, his entire body shook for a
few seconds. Then he was still. 15 minutes later he was pronounced dead.
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected Fults' appeal for mercy nearly 4 hours before
the scheduled execution hour of 7 p.m.
The rejection came even before Fults was given his last meal. Usually it is
well past the scheduled execution hour when the Supreme Court decides
last-minute appeals.
The State Board of Pardons and Paroles turned down his petition for clemency
Monday night.
In his appeal to the Supreme Court, Fults' asks the justices to stop his
execution at least until after they have heard arguments in a non-capital
Colorado case in which there were similar issues - jurors who allegedly held
racist attitudes that went against the defendant.
Daniel Anthony Lucas is scheduled to be executed April 27.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear in the fall an appeal by Miguel Angel
Pena-Rodriguez, who was convicted of attempted sexual assault on a child
younger than 15. It was later learned that some of the jurors who convicted
Pena-Rodriguez made derogatory comments about Mexicans.
In Fults' case, a juror who voted for death used a racial slur in an affidavit
he gave 8 years after Fults' trial.
Fults, a black man, pleaded guilty to murdering his white neighbor, 19-year-old
Cathy Bounds, on Jan. 30, 1996, at the end of a weeklong crime spree in
Griffin. Fults admitted he broke into several houses to steal guns so he could
kill his ex-girlfriend???s new boyfriend.
After Bounds' live-in boyfriend left for work that morning, Fults went into her
trailer, wrapped 6 feet of electrical tape around her eyes, led her into a
bedroom and put her face-down on a bed. As she begged for her life, he shot her
5 times in the back of the head.
Investigators canvassing the trailer park after Bounds' body was discovered
found under Fults' trailer items taken in previous burglaries, spent shells
from the .22-caliber handgun used to kill Bounds and a letter written in gang
code detailing her murder.
Faced with the evidence, Fults pleaded guilty with the hope the jury would show
mercy if he admitted to the crime and showed remorse.
Each prospective juror was asked if the differences in Fults' and Bounds' race
would matter, and all those seated, including Thomas Buffington, said it would
not.
But when an investigator working on Fults' appeal interviewed Buffington 8
years later, he gave a different answer, and confirmed it by repeating the
racial slur in a written sworn statement.
"I don't know if he (Fults) ever killed anybody, but that (slur) got just what
should have happened," Buffington, now dead, wrote. "Once he pled guilty, I
knew I would vote for the death penalty because that's what that (slur)
deserved."
The courts declined to hear that issue in Fults' appeals, writing that it was
too late and "procedurally barred."
Georgia has another execution set for April 27. Daniel Anthony Lucas is
scheduled to die by lethal injection for killing a Jones County father and his
2 children, 1 by 1, on April 23, 1998. Lucas' co-defendant, Brandon Rhode was
executed on Sept. 27, 2010.
1 woman and 62 men have been executed in Georgia since the death penalty was
reinstated in 1976.
Fults becomes the 4th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in Georgia
and the 64th overall since the state resumed capital punishment in 1983.
Fults becomes the 12th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in the USA
and the 1434th overall since the nation resumed executions on January 17, 1977.
(sources: Atlanta Journal Constitution & Rick Halperin)
OHIO:
A Bipartisan Push is Launched to End Ohio's Death Penalty
Ohio has no executions scheduled for nine months, and the state has no drugs to
carry out lethal injections.
So advocates are seizing the opportunity to lobby lawmakers on abandoning the
death penalty entirely. And they came armed with some powerful weapons: people
who were sentenced to die but who were freed after the charges against them
were dismissed.
9 men sentenced to die in Ohio have been exonerated. Together, those men spent
more than 200 years on Ohio's death row.
Derrick Jamison of Cincinnati spent 20 years under a death sentence for a
murder he didn't commit. Since the charges against him were dismissed and he
was released, he's been telling his story to inspire those working for an end
to capital punishment.
"It's real hard. I lost 53 of my friends here in Ohio. I'm the 119th death-row
exoneree in the United States. I'm the only survivor from Cincinnati, Ohio. I
lost a lot of my friends I grew up with in Cincinnati.
"So it's real hard coming out and speaking about it night after night. It gets
to you, but it's something you gotta do. It's something I got to do."
Another attempt to ban the death penalty
Democratic Rep. Nickie Antonio of Lakewood has proposed a death-penalty ban
several times, but this time her bill is jointly sponsored with Republican
Niraj Antani of Miamisburg near Dayton. Antonio says with no executions likely
in the near future, now is the time to consider recalling the death penalty.
"We've not have been here exactly like this with two joint sponsors from both
sides of the aisle. So I really believe this is the time to have the hearings,
to talk about this forward movement that we need to have especially in this
time of a moratorium."
Among those who addressed the activists before they set out to meet lawmakers
was Republican Sen. Bill Seitz of Cincinnati. He told them he doesn't want to
ban the death penalty, but he's proposed 2 laws that would make major changes.
"I'm not sure I'm quite where you are, but I'm very, very dedicated to 2
propositions. First, that we should do everything humanly possible to ensure
that an innocent person is not subjected to death at the hands of the state."
And he said legislators must make sure Ohio does not execute those who were
mentally ill at the time of their crimes.
The next scheduled execution
Ohio's next execution is set for January 2017. The state went to a single-drug
execution method after a problematic execution in 2014, but the drug that that
was approved for use is unavailable. And though a law was passed to encourage
compounding pharmacies to make it, none have.
So unless the state finds a way to acquire the drug or changes the method of
execution, there won't be any executions in the foreseeable future.
(source: WKSU news)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list