[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Fri Nov 27 12:46:37 CST 2015
Nov. 27
Court reserves decision on formation of JIT in Musharraf treason case
A special court in Islamabad on Saturday reserved its decision regarding
formation of joint investigation team and timeframe of probe in the treason
case against former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, Dunya News reported.
A special court bench headed by Justice Faisal Arab heard the case today.
Prosecution lawyer Akram Sheikh argued that the federal government will
challenge Islamabad High Court's decision in the same court through inter-court
appeal. If decision is upheld on inter-court appeal, another inquiry will be
held against November 3 move.
Akram Sheikh further argued that it is the government's prerogative to get the
matter investigated through any agency.
FIA team had refused to re-investigate the November 3rd action, stating that
the government failed to protect dignity of the agency.
The lawyer prayed to court to announce another timeframe for probe.
Meanwhile, Justice Faisal Arab remarked that apparently it seems that the
government and the defence party are seeing IHC's decision as vague. The high
court has left the matter of re-investigation up to the government.
The decision on the request will be announced at 4:00pm.
Musharraf faces the death penalty if convicted of charges over his suspension
of the constitution and imposition of emergency rule in 2007, when he was
trying to extend his tenure.
Musharraf governed the country for nearly a decade after the 1999 coup but was
forced to step down in 2008 after growing discontent with his rule. He left the
country soon after.
He returned to Pakistan in March 2013 after years in self-imposed exile, with
the hope of running in the national election that was held in May 2013. But he
was disqualified from participating in the vote because of his actions while in
power and has spent most of his time battling legal cases.
(source: Dunya News)
SRI LANKA/SAUDI ARABIA:
Sri Lanka urges Saudi not to stone to death maid for adultery
Sri Lanka said on Friday it was calling on Saudi Arabia to pardon a domestic
worker sentenced to death by stoning after she admitted committing adultery
while working in the Arab nation.
An official from Sri Lanka's Foreign Employment Bureau said the married
45-year-old woman who was working as a maid in Riyadh since 2013 was convicted
of adultery by a Saudi court in August.
Her partner, also a Sri Lankan migrant worker, was given a lesser punishment of
100 lashes on account of being single.
"She has accepted the crime 4 times in the courts. But the Foreign Employment
Bureau has hired lawyers and have appealed against the case," Upul Deshapriya,
spokesman for the Foreign Employment Bureau, told the Thomson Reuters
Foundation.
"The appeal is going on. Also from the foreign ministry side, they are in
negotiation with the Saudi government on a diplomatic level."
Officials from the Saudi Embassy in Colombo did not respond to requests from
the Thomson Reuters Foundation on whether they would consider the plea for
clemency.
Oil-producing Saudi Arabia follows Sharia, or Islamic law, and is often
criticised by human rights groups for the wide range of crimes such as
adultery, drug smuggling and witchcraft which carry the death penalty.
Stoning, a form of execution where a group throws stones at a person buried
waist or chest deep in the ground until they are dead, is still carried out in
parts of the Muslim world.
In 2013, Saudi Arabia beheaded a young Sri Lankan housemaid for the killing of
an infant left in her care, rejecting repeated appeals by Colombo against her
death sentence.
Thousands of men and women from the Indian Ocean island travel to the Middle
East every year to seek jobs as maids or drivers.
According to Central Bank data, 279,952 Sri Lankans went to work in Middle
Eastern nations in 2014, generating over $7 billion in remittances, around 9 %
of total GDP.
Saudi Arabia, which is current chair of the United Nations Human Rights Council
Panel, has executed over 150 people this year, mostly by public beheading, the
most in 20 years, rights group Amnesty International said this month.
Foreigners, mostly guest workers from poor countries, are particularly
vulnerable as they typically do not know Arabic and are denied adequate
translation in court, Amnesty said.
Riyadh says it provides fair trials to all defendants.
(source: Reuters)
****************
'Kill us alongside our children' defiant activists' mothers tell king
The mothers of 5 young Saudi prisoners sentenced to death by beheading made a
passionate plea to the king to spare their sons' lives. The appeal followed
reports that the Gulf kingdom is poised to execute more than 50 people
convicted of terrorism.
In a public letter the women said the verdicts against the young dissidents,
including Ali Mohammed al-Nimr, were based on confessions extracted under
torture and the related trials fell short of international standards.
"The sentences handed down to our children are unique in the history of Saudi
justice," the letter read. "As mothers of young men both deprived of their
right to liberty and facing an unknown fate that may deprive them of their
right to life, we demand that the Saudi government drop their sentences and
order their retrial."
It concluded: "We stress that we will only stay silent over this crime if they
kill us alongside our children." It was signed by Naima Ali al-Matrook, Fatima
Hassan al-Ghzwe, Zahra Hassan al-Rebh, Amena Ahmed al-Saker and Nasra Abdullah
al-Ahmed, mothers of 5 activists from the Shia minority arrested on sedition
charges in 2012 when they were all teenagers.
Among them is al-Nimr, a 21-year-old dissident whose case has triggered uproar
worldwide.The nephew of a vocal Shia cleric and activist, he was arrested aged
only 17, for taking part in a protest.
He was forced to sign a confession under torture and has since been sentenced
to death on a diverse set of charges, including attacking police, breaking
allegiance to the king, setting up terror cells, rioting and robbing a
pharmacy, according to human rights organisation Reprieve. Under Saudi Arabia's
draconian legal system, he is to be beheaded and his body crucified in public.
The death sentence is expected to be carried out in the coming days as local
media reported authorities were preparing for a mass execution of 55 convicts
in a single day.
"These executions must not go ahead and Saudi Arabia must lift the veil of
secrecy around its death penalty cases, as part of a fundamental overhaul of
its criminal justice system," said James Lynch, deputy director of the Middle
East and North Africa Programme at Amnesty International.
"Beheading or otherwise executing dozens of people in a single day would mark a
dizzying descent to yet another outrageous low for Saudi Arabia, whose
authorities have continued to show stone-faced cynicism and even open defiance
when authorities and ordinary people around the world question their sordid
record on the use of the death penalty".
(source: IB Times)
***************
Fellow poets protest Saudi death sentence facing Ashraf Fayadh
Poets from around the world are lining up in solidarity with the Palestinian
poet Ashraf Fayadh, with the Syrian poet Adonis, Ireland???s Paul Muldoon and
Britain's poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy among the signatories to a letter
laying out how "appalled" they are at the death sentence he has been handed by
Saudi Arabian authorities.
Fayadh was sentenced to death last week for renouncing Islam, a charge which he
denies. Evidence used against him included poems from his collection
Instructions Within, which is banned in Saudi Arabia, as well as his posts on
Twitter, and a conversation he had in a coffee shop in Abha which was said to
be blasphemous. He was given 30 days to appeal the sentence.
Today, PEN International published the latest salvo from an international arts
community which has rallied behind him, with Muldoon, Duffy and Adonis joined
as signatories to a letter attacking Saudi Arabia's ruling by major names from
the world of international poetry including the Serbian-American poet Charles
Simic, the American John Ashbery, Palestinian Ghassan Zaqtan, Israeli Amir Or
and the Hungarian-born George Szirtes.
"We, poets from around the world, are appalled that the Saudi Arabian
authorities have sentenced Palestinian poet Ashraf Fayadh to death for
apostasy," they write, in a letter which PEN International hopes to deliver to
the poet himself in an expression of solidarity. "It is not a crime to hold an
idea, however unpopular, nor is it a crime to express opinion peacefully. Every
individual has the freedom to believe or not believe. Freedom of conscience is
an essential human freedom."
The letter says that Fayadh's death sentence "is the latest example of the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's lack of tolerance for freedom of expression and
ongoing persecution of free thinkers", ending with a plea for the Palestinian's
release.
"We, Fayadh's fellow poets, urge the Saudi authorities to desist from punishing
individuals for the peaceful exercise of their right to freedom of expression
and call for his immediate and unconditional release," they write.
Speaking to the Guardian on Friday, Szirtes insisted that "opinions are not
crimes".
"Incitement can be a crime, hate speech may be a crime, but opinions are not,"
he said. "That is precisely why organisations such as PEN exist. Any sentence
for an individual opinion brings shame on Saudi Arabia: a death sentence brings
maximum shame."
According to Szirtes it is "incongruous for a country like ours to be allied
with a country that makes decisions like this".
"It runs counter to all our thoughts, habits and instincts, not just as poets
or writers but as human beings," he added. "Nor is it just a cultural matter:
it is a matter of exactly that which we describe as universal human rights."
The appeal follows the release of a joint statement signed by more than a dozen
cultural and free speech organisations condemning the conviction of the
Palestinian poet, including PEN International, which will be delivered to the
Saudi embassy in London today by English PEN.
Last week, Fayadh told the Guardian that he was "really shocked" to receive his
sentence "but it was expected, though I didn't do anything that deserves
death".
"They accused me [of] atheism and spreading some destructive thoughts into
society," he said, describing his poetry collection as "just about me being [a]
Palestinian refugee ... about cultural and philosophical issues. But the
religious extremists explained it as destructive ideas against God."
Pen International pointed to extracts of Fayadh's poems, translated by Mona
Kareem. "it was said: settle there... / but some of you are enemies for all /
so leave it now," he writes in one. "look up to yourselves from the bottom of
the river; / those of you on top should provide some pity for those
underneath."
The free speech organisation said that during his trial, the poet "expressed
repentance for anything in the book that religious authorities may have deemed
insulting", and said, according to trial documents: "I am repentant to God most
high and I am innocent of what appeared in my book mentioned in this case."
On 25 November, the Guardian reported that, in a message to his supporters,
Fayadh said he was "grateful for everyone working on my behalf". "To be honest,
I was surprised because I felt alone here. I am in good health. I'm struggling
to follow all the developments. People should know I am not against anyone
here, I am an artist and I am just looking for my freedom," said the poet.
(source: The Guardian)
MALAYSIA:
Hakam: Impose moratorium on execution of 1,022 death row prisoners
The National Human Rights Society of Malaysia (Hakam) welcomes the government's
move to abolish the mandatory death sentence for drug-related offences.
The mandatory death sentence deprives the sentencing judge of the discretion to
consider all relevant facts of the case and the individual circumstances of
each convicted person. A sentencing judge must be given the option to impose
the appropriate sentence.
Whilst removing the mandatory death sentence is a step in the right direction,
we would call on the government to abolish the mandatory death sentence in its
entirety for all criminal offences.
The death penalty violates the right to life guaranteed under Article 5 of our
Federal Constitution and is undoubtedly a cruel, inhuman and degrading
punishment contrary to international law. A recent public opinion survey on the
death penalty in Malaysia undertaken by Emeritus Professor Roger Hood QC from
the University of Oxford has shown that the majority of the Malaysian public do
not support an imposition of the death penalty.
We also call on the government to impose a moratorium on the execution of 1,022
death row prisoners currently waiting for execution pending the abolition of
the mandatory death sentence for all criminal offences.
Having been on the Human Rights Council and presently on the Security Council
as a non-permanent member, Malaysia must show a genuine commitment to abide by
international norms in relation to the right to life and the prohibition
against cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.
We hope that the government will continue taking steps in the right direction
towards the ultimate abolishment of the death penalty.
Ambiga Sreenevasan is president of Hakam. The above state was issued on behalf
of the Hakam executive committee.
Addendum
Following Hakam's statement calling for a moratorium of all 1,022 executions
while the government looks into abolishing the mandatory death sentence in
Malaysia, Hakam also urges the government to explore all diplomatic channels to
persuade the Singapore government to grant clemency to Kho Jabing, the
Sarawakian who is on death row in Singapore. Hakam acknowledges Sarawak Chief
Minister Adenan Satem's statement that he will write to appeal to the Singapore
government to grant clemency to Jabing.
This is indeed an urgent call for the government to defend one of her citizens
on death row. The Malaysian government must view this as a serious case. Kho
Jabing was sentenced to death in 2008 and in 2013, Singapore amended its law
concerning the mandatory death sentence. This resulted in a resentencing
hearing for Kho Jabing.
The High Court of Singapore then sentenced him to life imprisonment plus 24
strokes of the cane which shows that the High Court found that he should not be
sentenced to death. Upon appeal by the prosecution, the Court of Appeal
sentenced him to death in a 3-2 decision.
This fact plays an important role in proving that we should be pursuing all
means necessary to ensure he is given clemency and a chance at rehabilitation.
The court had also acquitted Kho Jabing's co-accussed, Galing, of murder charge
and sentenced him of the offence of robbery with hurt. The minority judgment of
the Court of Appeal also found that there was insufficient evidence to
establish beyond reasonable doubt that Kho Jabing had acted in a way which
exhibits viciousness or a blatant disregard for human life.
The Malaysian government must do all it can within its capacity to appeal to
the Singapore leadership to exercise discretion to grant Kho Jabing clemency.
This move should not be seen as interfering in the legal system of Singapore
but it must be viewed as the government's positive obligation to protect the
right to life of its citizens abroad.
Hakam reiterates that nobody should be sentenced to death as it is contrary to
international norms in relation to the right to life and the prohibition
against cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.
(source: aliran.com)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list