[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, ARK., IND., KAN.
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Sun May 31 13:27:54 CDT 2015
May 31
TEXAS:
Texas prison system isn't too keen on openness
The Texas prison system is, by design, a closed shop. Our official contact with
that inner world comes through the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's
public information officers.
For many years, Michelle Lyons was the department's top spokeswoman. She was
the face in front of the prison walls after inmate executions arguing with
European reporters about the fairness of the Texas death penalty.
Hers was the voice that talked to us about prison escapes, bad behavior by
prison officials and also the good times, such as they are, within the state
prison system.
In 2012, Lyons was demoted from director of public information. She was shunted
to a Siberia-like TDCJ outpost where she was told to handle research requests
from Texas students. She was no longer allowed to talk to reporters.
Her pay was cut. Eventually, to avoid firing, she resigned.
As one of the youngest members of the TDCJ senior staff (and the rare woman),
she sued the department, alleging employment discrimination.
I bring this up for a couple of reasons. Usually, as with Vegas, what happens
in the prison system stays in the prison system. Not this time.
Another reason: I recently told the story of how the Texas Department of Public
Safety's public information department isn't always forthcoming. Lyons says she
got crosswise with TDCJ administrators because they decided she was too open
with the news media, and, by extension, the general public. They wanted to
clamp down on public information, too, she says.
Lyons says there are similarities between DPS' and TDCJ's public information
strategies.
She saw it all
As the prison system's spokeswoman, Lyons was eyewitness to almost 300
executions. She was a staunch defender of the prison system's programs and
people. A Texas Monthly profile last year called her "a disarmingly friendly,
upbeat spokesperson for the biggest prison system in the nation."
Friendly and upbeat. Those aren't words usually associated with a prison
system. But her positive attitude was harder to hold on to once the walls came
tumbling down on her.
The charge against her: She kept incorrect payroll time sheets of her work
hours. She was told when she was hired that she was to mark 8 hours for each
day of the workweek on her time sheet.
As a spokeswoman, she worked odd hours, nights and weekends, often from home.
That 8-hour notation was supposed to cover her 40-hour week. That's standard.
That's how I've marked time sheets my entire career.
Her bosses used this flimsiness to take her out. "Suddenly, I was told I had
been keeping time wrong for the decade I worked there," she says. "If I wasn't
physically in the office for 8 hours, I had to take vacation or sick time.
"As an example, I had to go back to a day when I was only in the office for 7
hours and 45 minutes and take 15 minutes of vacation."
That's a violation of labor laws.
Her uncomfortable situation turned into a crisis after a correctional officer
who published a now-defunct prison news blog wrote her and asked what was
happening. She answered that there were labor law violations and copied her
answer to others, including a state senator.
Within hours, her email account was frozen and she was charged with violating
orders. She had talked to a reporter when she wasn't supposed to, they said.
Months earlier, they had told her the blogger was not a reporter. Suddenly,
though, the fellow TDCJ employee was considered one. She had violated policy.
After quitting, she filed for unemployment and won her claim when she proved
TDCJ had created a hostile work environment.
Court case
She sued in federal court, but a judge tossed the case. Then an appeals judge
reinstated it. He ruled that there was important evidence that could convince a
jury she was in the right. Her predecessor had testified that he taught her how
to fill out her timecard the way she did. She wasn't breaking the rules.
Late last year, the state agreed to a financial settlement to end the case.
When news of her settlement was reported on Scott Henson's Grits for Breakfast
criminal justice blog in February, Lyons denounced her successor, prisons
spokesman Jason Clark.
Clark, she maintains, kept track of his hours the same way she did. But when he
answered questions in the investigation, he didn't support her version. She
lost. He won.
"My replacement, Jason Clark, should be investigated for perjury," she told the
blog, a statement she stands behind. "He lied under oath about his own
timekeeping practices and then was rewarded with a promotion. I'm sure it will
never happen, but I think any journalist should be wary of the information he
dispenses to them."
I write to Clark. His underling, Robert Hurst, replies: "Here is TDCJ's
statement. While TDCJ remains confident of the decisions it made with respect
to the employment of Michelle Lyons, the prospect of ongoing litigation and
associated costs were determining factors in settling the case."
When I ask if Clark is available, Hurst answers, "Jason was dealing with other
issues today."
(source: Dave Lieber, Dallas Morning News)
ARKANSAS:
Decay claims jury selection flawed, seeks new trial
Attorneys for condemned double-murderer Gregory Decay are taking 1 more crack
at getting his convictions overturned by the Arkansas Supreme Court, arguing
jury selection in the death penalty case was flawed.
Decay, 29, gunned down Kevin Barkley Jones and Kendall Rachell Rice in their
Fayetteville apartment April 3, 2007. Both were 24. Decay was convicted and
given 2 death sentences in April 2008. Decay must exhaust all state court
remedies before beginning the federal appeals process.
Death penalty convictions in Arkansas automatically are appealed to the
Arkansas Supreme Court for mandatory review. The court upheld the capital
convictions in November 2009. A subsequent appeal that claimed ineffective
counsel was rejected.
The high court has agreed to at least listen to the latest argument. Decay's
attorneys at the Federal Public Defender's Office in Little Rock this week
filed motions that ask the court to recall its mandate in the case, vacate the
convictions and remand the case to settle the record or, if the record in the
case cannot be reconstructed, a new trial.
They contend the record was not sufficient for the court to fully review the
case. They argue the high court did not receive a full record of the
proceedings on appeal, specifically information about juror questionnaires and
the striking of some potential jurors before trial.
The motion, by Assistant Federal Public Defender Scott Braden, contends
critical parts of the jury selection were done off the record, outside the
courtroom and out of Decay's presence.
"30 jurors were excluded before trial began with no record of these exclusions
or strikes. At least 1 of the jurors stricken by the prosecution prior to trial
was African American," according to the motion, "Mr. Decay, a black man charged
with killing 2 white victims, was tried, convicted and sentenced to death by an
all-white jury."
The other African American in the jury pool was never called during jury
selection process.
The motion says extensive questionnaires sent to potential jurors before trial
were destroyed, preventing them from being made part of the appeal record, and
there was no record from the lower court about how they were used in the jury
selection process.
"What this court did not know, because the trial court abused its discretion in
not making the necessary record, was how this 'lengthy questionnaire' was
created," according to the motion. "On April 17, 2008, thirty jurors were
peremptorily stricken before trial based solely on this questionnaire and at
least 1 African American juror was excluded in this process. Conducting or
allowing this off-the-record proceeding was an abuse of the trial court's
discretion in jury selection."
The abuse of discretion directly prevented the Supreme Court's mandatory
review, causing a breakdown in the appellate procedure and deprived Decay of
his fundamental constitutional rights, according to the motion.
Lawyers from the Arkansas Attorney General's Office have filed a response
saying there are no grounds to recall the mandate because Decay did not ask for
the jury selection process to be made a part of the appeal record and his trial
attorneys agreed to the jury selection format.
"There is no affidavit indicating that these materials were not available in
defense counsel's files for inclusion on direct review via a motion to settle
the record or to supplement the record," according to the response.
"Accordingly, the appellant does not demonstrate that the record was incomplete
or that the trial court improperly destroyed the juror's questionnaires."
The response, by Assistant Attorney General Karen Wallace, also contends Decay
has not demonstrated how the court's review of the material would have changed
the result of his appeal.
Decay walked into the apartment on Sycamore Street and shot Jones in the face
with a .40-caliber pistol from less than 2 feet away. Then he turned and shot
Rice in the face. During an interview with police, Decay said he killed Jones
and Rice because he believed they had broken into his apartment and stolen
marijuana and a gun.
Jesse Westeen, 28, was convicted of being an accomplice. He pleaded guilty to
driving Decay to the apartment. He was sentenced to 50 years.
Decay was the 1st person to be given a death sentence in Washington County
since 1981. A convict from Washington County hasn't been executed since 1920.
Several others were sentenced to death in the interim, but their sentences were
either commuted to life in prison when the U.S. Supreme Court declared the
death penalty unconstitutional in 1972 or their sentences were overturned on
appeal. The death penalty was reinstated in 1976.
Benton County last had a murderer executed in August 1996 when Frankie Parker
was put to death for killing his former in-laws and holding his ex-wife hostage
in 1984 in Rogers.
Death row
Benton County has 3 men on Arkansas' death row. Zachary Holly, 30, was
sentenced to death earlier this week for the murder, kidnapping and rape of
6-year-old Jersey Bridgeman. Don Davis was sentenced to die in 1992 for the
execution-style killing of Jane Daniel of Rogers. Brandon Lacy was sentenced to
die in 2009 for the murder of Randy Walker. Circuit Judge Robin Green ruled
that Lacy is entitled to another sentencing hearing, which is on appeal.
Washington County has 2 men on death row: Decay and Zachariah Marcyniuk. Both
men were sentenced to death in 2008. Marcyniuk, 36, stabbed University of
Arkansas student Katie Wood to death after breaking into her apartment and
laying in wait for her.
(source: nwaonline.com)
INDIANA:
Paula Cooper could not escape the burden of judgment
Those who had the least reason to forgive Paula Cooper eventually did. And then
the law found a way to give her a 2nd chance, too.
2 million petitioners, plus Pope John Paul II, had asked Indiana to spare her
life. But Indiana seemed as committed to her death in the electric chair as she
had been in killing an elderly Gary teacher in 1986.
The Supreme Court soon ruled that 16 was too young to execute anyone in
America; so Paula Cooper was spared. She would be the last American that young
to be condemned.
But Cooper could not spare herself. She put a gun to her head and killed
herself this week in Indianapolis.
In the end, it was Cooper who could not endure the burden of her own life. She
had been freed from prison 2 years ago. The last 700 days were her only free
sunrises for the past 30 years.
Cooper's sister, Rhonda Labroi, told reporters 2 years ago that she had high
hopes for her sister who earned a bachelor's degree, became a tutor and
seemingly matured in prison.
"She's a very different person," Labroi told Indianapolis reporters. "She is a
lot more educated and older and wiser now. I think things will be different.
(She) has paid her price. There are 2nd chances. It seems like God has given
her another chance. I think if people give her a second chance, she'll do
fine."
Because many states - Indiana being one of them - execute killers with
diminishing regularity in the 21st century, we are tempted to exaggerate our
temperance. Those who remember the heinous brutality of some crimes might think
the killer has escaped punishment by escaping execution.
Though rates have fallen significantly in the last 20 years, suicide remains
among the predominant causes of death in both local jails and state prisons.
Young inmates kill themselves most frequently. Depression follows inmates to
freedom.
There is one obvious pattern to the suicides. Killers who murdered family
members in a fit of outraged emotion show up more frequently in the suicide
roles.
Killers who enter prison as mentally deranged do not accrue more stability
behind bars. Prison does not fix what is wrong. What brought killers to prison
is less an isolated event in their lives than a reflection of who they are and
how they cope.
Within the last 5 years, at least 40 convicted American killers have killed
themselves either in prison or shortly after having been freed.
In 2014, Purdue student Cody Cousins was sentenced to 64 years after shooting
and stabbing to death a classmate "because I wanted to." He killed himself with
a razor at the Michigan City prison in October.
In 1981, King Edward Bell shot to death his 4 young children, then killed his
estranged wife and her mother. The Indianapolis man pleaded guilty but mentally
ill and committed suicide in prison in 1987.
John R. Wall Jr., 22, of Logansport murdered his father and 4 other relatives
in 1979. He also attempted to shoot his mother. Wall was sentenced to 150 years
but appealed. His conviction was overturned by the Indiana Supreme Court
because police had continued to question Wall after he asked for an attorney.
He committed suicide in 1992 at Logansport State Hospital.
Every state, every maximum-security lockup has housed killers who take their
own lives in prison or shortly after being freed.
Cooper was 15 when she murdered a 78-year-old Gary Bible studies teacher.
She admitted stabbing Ruth Pelke 33 times with a 12-inch butcher knife in a
robbery that netted $10 and an old car. Cooper's 3 teen female accomplices all
got lighter sentences and were freed from prison years ago.
It was, even by comparison to other human abominations, a vicious and cruel
crime. The community was outraged. Then prosecutor Jack Crawford, who now
opposes the death penalty, said at her release from Rockville State Prison that
if any teen had ever deserved execution under rules then in effect, it was
Cooper.
She pleaded guilty and never recanted.
But Cooper eventually worked at becoming a different person. In a 2004
newspaper interview, she expressed remorse and hope. She had not reflected
either in earlier years.
"Everybody has a responsibility to do right or wrong, and if you do wrong, you
should be punished," she said. "Rehabilitation comes from you. If you're not
ready to be rehabilitated, you won't be."
Her words linger.
(source: Commentary, David Rutter; Chicago Tribune)
KANSAS:
In Flack capital murder case, court documents sealed outstrip documents open to
public----Ottawa newspaper seeks open records, reopening earlier sealed records
The tally of court documents that are sealed from public view in a quadruple
murder case in Franklin County District Court outnumber the documents open to
the public.
As of April 8, 60 court documents had been sealed, a court spokesman was quoted
as saying at that time. On Friday, a total of 49 were public, according to an
online court site for the Flack case.
Maxwell Kautsch, a Lawrence attorney representing the Ottawa Herald newspaper,
is challenging the sealing of the court records.
Kyle Trevor Flack, 29, was bound over March 12, 2014, on charges of capital
murder in the slayings of Kaylie Smith Bailey, 21, and her daughter, Lana-Leigh
Bailey, 18 months; the premeditated 1st-degree murders of Andrew Adam Stout,
30, and Steven White, 31; and criminal possession of a firearm by a felon.
On April 8, John Steelman, court administrator for the 4th Judicial District,
was quoted as saying 60 court documents had been sealed.
The documents were closed to the public by District Court Judges Thomas Sachse
and Eric Godderz. Sachse retired in 2014, then Godderz took over the case. As
of April 8, Godderz had sealed 27 records and before that, Sachse had sealed 33
records. On Friday, it couldn't be determined how many court documents have
been sealed since April 8.
The 4th Judicial District encompasses the counties of Franklin, Osage, Anderson
and Coffey.
Saying the Franklin County District Court had failed to justify sealing court
records in a quadruple murder case, the Ottawa Herald newspaper filed a motion
on May 19 seeking a court order:
--To block the sealing of more records.
--To open records earlier sealed.
--To hear future requests to seal documents in open court preceded by a notice
to the Ottawa Herald so that it might be heard on the request.
"Continuing the seal of the records risks breeding suspicion, distrust and
cynicism," Kautsch wrote in the court filing, and he will argue it in Franklin
County District Court on June 9.
The Ottawa Herald "submits that the only way to truly protect the integrity of
the proceedings is to return to the presumption of openness mandated by law."
The Kahler case
In an interview with a Capital-Journal reporter this week, Kautsch noted that
during the 2011 capital murder case of James Kraig Kahler in neighboring Osage
county, court records weren't sealed.
Kahler, of Meriden and earlier of Columbia, Mo., was sentenced to death for the
killings of his estranged wife, their daughters, 18 and 16, and his wife's
grandmother, 89. The 4 victims were shot on Nov. 28, 2009.
Kahler, now 52, was sentenced on Oct. 11, 2011, in the Osage County Courthouse
in Lyndon. He also was sentenced to 31 to 34 months for a conviction of
aggravated burglary for breaking into the grandmother's home in Burlingame.
The fact the Kahler trial was conducted in a neighboring jurisdiction without
sealing court records shows "you don't need to seal any records," Kautsch said.
The Kahler case "is an extremely parallel situation," Kautsch said.
Kautsch: Rulings support openness
In Kautsch's filing in the Flack case, he pointed to Kansas Supreme Court
rulings that support open court proceedings and open court records.
"Beginning with Kansas City Star v. Fossey (a 1981 case), the Kansas Supreme
Court has long recognized 'a strong presumption in favor of open, judicial
proceedings and free access to records in a criminal case,'" Kautsch wrote.
A trial judge can close a preliminary hearing, bail hearing or any other
pretrial hearing and seal a record only if dissemination of information from
the proceeding and its record would "create a clear and present danger to the
fairness of the trial" and the prejudicial effect of such information on the
fairness of the trial can't be avoided by any "reasonable alternative means,"
Kautsch quoted Fossey as saying.
Kansas Supreme Court decisions in Fossey and other cases "and elsewhere reflect
a widely recognized public right to know about judicial matters, including a
common law right of access to court records," Kautsch wrote.
"High-profile cases on both a national and state level have demonstrated that
it is possible to impanel an unbiased jury even in the light of pretrial
publicity well beyond the scope of publicity in this case," Kautsch wrote.
"The Kansas Supreme Court has been extremely consistent in finding that
pre-trial publicity did not prevent fair trials," Kautsch wrote.
The Carr case
In the Carr brothers case, the Kansas Supreme Court found that political
billboards identified the alleged killer, and that was insufficient to rise to
the level to necessitate a change of venue due to publicity, Kautsch said.
Brothers Jonathan and Reginald Carr were charged and convicted in the killings
of 4 people in December 2000 in Wichita.
In July 2014, the Kansas Supreme Court overturned death penalty sentences for
the Carrs based on other factors.
"Fears that pretrial publicity (in the Flack case) would taint the jury pool
are just unfounded," Kautsch said.
The Franklin County District Court must consider alternatives to sealing court
records, Kautsch said, noting the Fossey and other Kansas Supreme Court
rulings.
Early in the Flack case, a prosecutor filed a motion on July 1, 2013, seeking
to seal all pleadings in the case.
Sachse, the judge at that time, ruled that rather than issuing a blanket order
to seal all filed documents, he would rule on an individual basis whether to
seal a document.
Flack's trial is scheduled to start on Sept. 21, 2015.
(source: Topeka Capital-Journal)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list