[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----IDAHO, CALIF., ORE., WASH., USA
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Wed Mar 4 14:20:06 CST 2015
March 4
IDAHO:
Idaho court upholds lower court's death penalty sentence
An Idaho death row inmate will remain there following an Idaho Supreme Court
decision upholding a lower court's ruling rejecting a post-conviction relief
request.
The Idaho Supreme Court in a 189-page decision released Monday ruled that
37-year-old Azad Haji Abdullah's death sentence for killing his wife and trying
to kill 3 children will remain in place.
Abdullah received the death penalty after being convicted in 2004 of 1st-degree
murder, 1st-degree arson, 3 counts of attempted 1st-degree murder, and felony
injury to a child.
Authorities say Abdullah in 2002 killed his wife in their Boise home and then
set fire to the house with 2 of their children and a young friend asleep
inside. Another of their children was in the backyard.
(source: Associated Press)
CALIFORNIA:
Lawyer Proposes Death Penalty For Gays In California With "Sodomite Suppression
Act"
San Diego lawyer Matt McLaughlin has proposed a ballot initiative that calls
for the death penalty for homosexuals in California.
The Sodomite Suppression Act, McLaughlin's submission to the state Attorney
General's office, declares same-sex sex is a "monstrous evil that Almighty God,
giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter
destruction, even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha [sic]."
And he thinks us sodomites would be better off dead: "It is better that
offenders should die rather than that all of us should be killed by God's just
wrath against us for the folly of tolerating wickedness in our midst, the
People of California wisely command ... that any person who willingly touches
another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put
to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method."
Perhaps McLaughlin didn't hear California outlawed the death penalty last year?
In an ironic tip of the hat to Vladimir Putin, the SSA also bans the
distribution of "sodomistic propaganda," and bars LGBT people from holding
public office.
Another provision of the measure:
This law is effective immediately and shall not be rendered ineffective nor
invalidated by any court, state or federal, until heard by a quorum of the
Supreme Court of California consisting only of judges who are neither sodomites
nor subject to disqualification hereunder.
If McLaughlin wants his initiative to make its way onto a public ballot, he'll
need to get some 350,000 signatures. For now, California Attorney General
Kamala D. Harris is giving it a look.
(source: NewNowNext.com)
OREGON:
Handing over the reins of Oregon's Death Row
Despite rumors on the subject, former Gov. John Kitzhaber did not commute
Oregon's 34 pending death sentences before resigning last month -- although it
wasn't like it would have gotten him into any more trouble. Kitzhaber, who'd
been governor during Oregon's only 2 executions of the last half-century, had
made it clear he wasn't going to sit through any more, but didn't feel the need
to extend the ban beyond his own tenure.
That left incoming Gov. Kate Brown as the new landlady of Oregon's death row,
and the subject came up almost immediately. Last week, Brown told Jeff Mapes of
The Oregonian/OregonLive that she personally opposed the death penalty and
expected to continue Kitzhaber's moratorium. But she wouldn't say an execution
was impossible, explaining that her thinking on the issue had become "more
nuanced."
It's possible to overstate the uncertainty here; offhand, you might expect Kate
Brown to sign an execution order when Earl Blumenauer trades his bicycle for a
rickshaw. And as she says, "I think there are a whole lot of issues that need
to be resolved. And one of them is, can we even carry this out at this point in
time in this country?"
Technique is everything. And lately, all over the country, there are issues
about not only why but how we execute people.
(Or in Oregon's case, of course, how we don't.)
Supplies of the drugs that have been part of the three-drug combination used in
most U.S. executions have been running out, as European manufacturers, opposed
to capital punishment, have been refusing to supply them. (After Kitzhaber
declared his moratorium, Oregon said it would sell its supply back.)
Replacement drugs have produced extended, messy executions in Arizona and
Oklahoma, and some states, such as Ohio, have declared their own moratoriums
until the situation is sorted out.
For various reasons, the feds -- who don't execute a lot of people anyway --
have declared their own freeze, and outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder has
urged states to do the same. There's anticipation of a Supreme Court ruling on
which drugs are and aren't acceptable.
Last month, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, another new Democratic governor -- and
there aren't many new Democratic governors -- declared an execution moratorium,
as he said he would during his campaign. There are more than 180 convicts on
Pennsylvania's death row; since the reinstatement of the death penalty by the
U.S. Supreme Court in 1976, Pennsylvania has executed exactly 3 people. During
that time, going through the motions of capital punishment has cost the state
an estimated $350 million.
It's said that more people on Pennsylvania's Death Row die of natural causes
than of execution. Since 6 residents have been freed on appeal, you could also
say more have been released than executed.
"This unending cycle of death warrants and appeals diverts resources from the
judicial system and forces the families and loved ones of victims to relive
their tragedies each time a new round of warrants and appeals commences," Wolf
wrote in his moratorium order. "The only certainty in the current system is
that the process will be drawn out, expensive, and painful for all involved."
Pennsylvania's situation, in fact, has been greatly like Oregon's --
maintaining at considerable effort and expense a penalty virtually never used.
Pennsylvania managed to execute one more convict over 40 years than Oregon did,
but it had many more sentenced -- and unlike Oregon's, its executions may not
have been voluntary.
Both states, like all the others, are dealing with the drug shortage. Last
month, Utah's House of Representatives passed a bill restoring execution by
firing squad; it now moves to the state Senate, and Wyoming is also taking aim.
It's not as easy to imagine Oregon going in that direction, although we could
probably find volunteers.
There is talk about putting a repeal of capital punishment on the 2016 ballot,
where the odds might be against it; many voters like the idea of capital
punishment, even if it hardly ever happens in practice.
People on Oregon's death row have been convicted of doing hideous things,
making it even more curious for Oregon to spend large amounts on a decades-long
appeals process that ends up giving them the choice of departure. Now that
process is muddied even more by the challenges of actually carrying it out,
with legal and procedural complications joined by pharmacological ones.
And despite the great deal of attention the idea has gotten recently, we're
probably not going to take up beheading.
Although on this issue, we've been in no hurry to use ours.
(source: Opinion, David Sarasohn, orefonlive.com)
WASHINGTON:
California case reignites Washington death penalty debate----In California a
man is suing the state for not executing his family's killer -- despite being
sentenced to death decades ago. A family in Washington is undergoing a similar
situation.
30 years after the murder of his mother, sister and 2 nephews, a California man
is suing that state for not executing the killer, even though he was sentenced
to death.
It has some people in Washington state wondering if they can pursue the same
option.
Kermit Alexander said he trusted in the legal system for years. But, the killer
is still sitting in prison decades later. Because of that, Alexander filed a
lawsuit demanding California put in place an execution protocol and end the
murderer's life.
Alexander won a small victory last month when a superior court judge agreed
that he had standing to bring the action, so there will be a hearing on the
merits of the suit.
Washington state Governor Jay Inslee put a moratorium on the death penalty last
year, but the California case has some Washington families looking at their
options.
Jane Hungerford Trapp was found dead at the top of a stairwell in Tacoma in
1996. Cecil Davis was convicted of her murder, and another, and was sentenced
to death.
20 years later, Davis remains in the state penitentiary in Walla Walla.
"We grew up learning that if you break the law, the law will punish you," said
Kathy Obert, Hungerford-Trapp's niece. "Where is his punishment? He gets a new
free home, paid for by us. This is just outrageously wrong."
Obert said her family will be following the California case closely as they
work to figure out if there are any other options when it comes to getting
Davis executed.
Jessie Ripley is Hungerford Trapp's daughter. She said it's been exceptionally
difficult having her children grow up without a grandmother and spending most
of her adult life without a mom.
"He (Davis) doesn't get to say, 'Oh I wish I could see my family,' because,
guess what? His family can go visit him. I don't get any of that. My children
don't get any of that," Ripley said. "I'm sitting here working. My family is
sitting here working to support him in a prison. Somebody who took something
from us. Now I have to support him? Where's the justice in that."
Governor Jay Inslee's office declined comment on this story, but it is expected
that as long as he is in office, the moratorium on the death penalty in the
state will remain in place.
(source: KREM news)
USA:
Louis "Lepke" Buchalter Gets the Chair
On March 4th 1944, one of the most notorious crime bosses in US History was
executed by electric chair at Sing Sing Prison in New York. Louis "Lepke"
Buchalter's execution gave him the distinction of being the only US mob boss to
receive the death penalty from the US Government.
Born in the Lower East Side of Manhattan in February 1897, Buchalter's family
were Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe. His mother gave him the nickname
"Lepkeleh", which means 'little Louis' in Yiddish, it was later shortened to
"Lepke". Following the death of his father and his mother moving to Arizona for
health reasons, Lepke was left in the care of his sister in New York.
The time spent in his sister's care saw Buchalter's first involvement with
crime. In September 1915, he was arrested for burglary and assault, although
the case was discharged. In February 1916, he was again arrested for burglary,
and sentenced to a juvenile offenders institute until July 1917. In September
1917, he was sentenced to 18 months in the state prison at Sing Sing in New
York (the very same prison in which he would be killed decades later).
Following his release in January 1919, he was arrested and sentenced again a
year later, this time to a 30 month sentence.
Following his release from prison in 1922, Buchalter moved into the world of
organised crime with his fellow youthful crook Jacob "Gurrah" Shapiro. The 2
supposedly met after both attempted to rob the same pushcart, they quickly
decided to pool their resources in order to extort Manhattan's pushcart owners.
Establishing themselves through their extortion and protection businesses, they
eventually joined Jacob Orgen's gang. Lepke terrorised New York's garment
workers, taking control of the city's textile unions and receiving bribery
payments from both employers and the union members. As the 1920s wore on,
Lepke's reputation and presence in the New York underworld continued to grow,
and he turned his attention to alcohol bootlegging, illegal gambling and
ultimately, the narcotics trade.
In many ways, Louis Buchalter was representative of a drastic change taking
place in the world of American organised crime during this period. Buchalter
was of Jewish origin, but he was not restricted to just working with members of
New York's Jewish community. He was a member of the large Mafia concern run by
Charles Luciano, who in turn had a close business relationship with Mayer
Lansky, a gangster from a Russian Jewish family. Whereas the early 20th century
had seen criminal organisations in the USA split along ethnic grounds, by the
1930s it was increasingly common for the old racial prejudices between
different ethnic groups to be set aside for mutual financial gain.
Buchalter's notoriety came from his running of an organisation of hired
killers, which later came to be known as 'Murder Inc.', in reference to the
business like approach it took to killing. Murder Inc. made profit through
killing troublesome gangsters within the mob, as well as eliminating eye
witnesses to the mob's crimes. Inevitably, it is difficult to determine exactly
how many hit men were on the organisation's pay roll, and how many deaths it
was responsible for, but it made Buchalter one of the most powerful gangsters
in the United States.
The details of his arrest in 1939 are particularly interesting. Up until then
he had used bribery and intimidation to keep himself free from the authorities.
However, in August, word was received by the FBI that he was willing to
surrender, if a deal could be struck. On 24th August, he arranged to meet FBI
Director J. Edgar Hoover to hand himself in. Although Buchalter was arrested
before he reached the agreed meeting spot, he was brought to Hoover, and taken
away in the director's black limousine.
Buchalter initially escaped the death penalty, instead being sentenced to just
14 years in prison for narcotics offences, with his links to Murder Inc.
initially being overlooked. Exact details of the deal he struck with Hoover are
unknown, but the benefits did not last long. Buchalter was eventually turned
over to New York authorities, run by District Attorney Thomas Dewey, who had
vowed to give Buchalter the death penalty. Buchalter was eventually betrayed by
Abe Reles, a mobster who had become an informant. Reles implicated Buchalter in
4 murders, and in December 1941 the boss of Murder Inc. was sentenced to death.
Conspiracy theories surround the decision to execute Buchalter. When he was
first arrested, the Chicago Tribune published an article claiming Buchalter had
only avoided the death sentence because he had made a deal to keep silent about
links between the Roosevelt administration and Murder Inc.
These conspiracy theories had further weight attached to them after Buchalter's
execution was delayed by two days. Officially, the delay was the result of a
final appeal by Buchalter's attorney, relating to the procedures of Buchalter's
arrest and trial. At the time however, New York's newspapers speculated that
Buchalter had more information to reveal. In particular, this related to Sidney
Hillman, a member of Roosevelt's administration. Hillman was also president of
the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America. Buchalter's earlier involvement
with garment workers' unions led some to theorise that he could have held
incriminating information on Hillman. Information which would have inevitably
proved damaging to the whole Roosevelt administration.
Despite the delay, Buchalter was put to the electric chair on 4th March 1944.
The anniversary of his death provides a timely reminder of the prominence of
organised crime in the United States in the 1930s and 1940s, and how entwined
criminality became with US society and politics.
(source: newhistorian.com)
*************************
Jury selection continues in Colorado theater shooting case with questions about
death penalty
Jury selection in the Colorado theater shooting trial is continuing with
attorneys asking prospective jurors about their views on the death penalty and
mental illness.
As of Tuesday, Judge Carlos Samour had asked 47 potential jurors to return for
more questioning. He hopes to have 120 from which to choose 12 jurors and 12
alternates.
Those selected will decide if James Holmes was legally insane during the 2012
attack that left 12 dead and 70 injured. Prosecutors are seeking the death
penalty.
On Tuesday, Samour dismissed a woman who said she could never impose the death
penalty and a clairvoyant, out of concern that she would apply her skills
during testimony.
A nurse, a data analyst and a woman who has a friend who knew some of the
victims were asked to return.
(source: Associated Press)
**************************
Jury seated in US death penalty trial of Boston Marathon bombing suspect
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
After 2 months of jury selection, a panel of 12 jurors and 6 alternates was
seated Tuesday for the federal death penalty trial of Boston Marathon bombing
suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
The panel consists of 8 men and 10 women. Opening statements in the case are
scheduled for Wednesday.
Tsarnaev, 21, faces 30 charges in connection with twin bombings at the finish
line of the marathon April 15, 2013. 3 people were killed and more than 260
were injured. He is also charged in the killing of a Massachusetts Institute of
Technology police officer days after the bombings.
If the jury convicts Tsarnaev, the trial will move on to a 2nd phase to
determine his punishment. The only 2 options available for the jury are life in
prison or the death penalty.
Judge George O'Toole Jr., prosecutors and Tsarnaev's lawyers questioned
prospective jurors individually.
Many potential jurors were excused when they said they had already formed an
opinion on Tsarnaev's guilt or were morally opposed to the death penalty. Many
others were dismissed because of personal connections to the bombings,
including people who have friends or family who were near the finish line when
the bombs went off or who knew first responders who treated victims.
During the jury selection process, Tsarnaev's lawyers tried repeatedly to get
the trial moved out of Massachusetts, saying he could not find a fair and
impartial jury because of the emotional impact the bombings had in the state.
O'Toole rejected 3 change-of-venue motions, saying the process of carefully
questioning jurors to detect bias was successful in finding impartial jurors.
The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals twice refused to order the trial moved.
(source: Fox News)
***********************
Tsarnaev's lawyer admits he carried out Boston bombing----Tsarnaev may face
death penalty if convicted in Marathon bombing
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev went on trial for his life Wednesday in the Boston Marathon
bombing with his own lawyer bluntly telling the jury he committed the crime.
But she argued that he had fallen under the influence of his older brother.
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has pleaded not guilty to 30 charges connected to the April
2013 explosions that killed 3 people and wounded more than 260 others.
"It WAS him," Judy Clarke, one of the nation's foremost death-penalty defense
attorneys, said of Tsarnaev in a startling opening statement in the most
closely watched terrorism trial in the U.S. since the Oklahoma City bombing
nearly 20 years ago.
Laying out an argument aimed at saving Tsarnaev not from a guilty verdict but
from the death penalty, Clarke said that the defense will not try to "sidestep"
his involvement in the "senseless, horribly misguided acts carried out by 2
brothers."
"The evidence will not establish and we will not argue that Tamerlan put a gun
to Dzhokhar's head or that he forced him to join in the plan," Clarke said,
"but you will hear evidence about the kind of influence that this older brother
had."
She began laying out her case after prosecutors sketched out the scene of
horror at the marathon and accused Tsarnaev of cold-bloodedly planting a bomb
designed to "tear people apart and create a bloody spectacle," and then hanging
out with his college buddies as if nothing had happened.
"He believed that he was a soldier in a holy war against Americans," Assistant
U.S. Attorney William Weinreb said. "He also believed that by winning that
victory, he had taken a step toward reaching paradise. That was his motive for
committing these crimes."
A shaggy-haired, goateed Tsarnaev, 21, slouched in his seat and looked at
Weinreb as the prosecutor launched into his opening statement.
3 people were killed and more than 260 hurt when 2 pressure-cooker bombs
exploded near the finish line seconds apart on April 15, 2013. Tsarnaev is
accused of carrying out the attacks with his older brother, now dead.
About 2 dozen victims took up the entire left-hand side the courtroom, watching
somberly as Weinreb described the carnage. Several hung their heads and
appeared to fight back tears.
Weinreb said Tsarnaev carried a bomb in a backpack, and it was "the type of
bombs favored by terrorists because it's designed to tear people apart and
create a bloody spectacle."
Sketching out the horrific scene on the streets after the 2 shrapnel-packed
pressure-cooker bombs exploded, Weinreb said: "The air was filled with the
smell of burning sulfur and people's screams."
The prosecutor described how 8-year-old Martin Richard stood on a metal barrier
with other children so he could get a good view of the runners.
"The bomb tore large chunks of flesh out of Martin Richard," and the boy bled
to death on the sidewalk as his mother looked on helplessly, Weinreb told the
jury, with the boy's parents in the courtroom.
After the bombings, Tsarnaev "acted like he didn't have a care in the world,"
the prosecutor said. Weinreb said Tsarnaev went back to the University of
Massachusetts-Dartmouth and hung out with his friends.
"While victims of the bombing lay in the hospital and learned that they would
have to have their limbs chopped off to save their lives, the defendant
pretended that nothing had happened," Weinreb said.
Clarke, in an opening statement that took less than 20 minutes, ended by asking
the jury to "hold your hearts and minds open" until the second phase of the
trial, when the defense will try to save Tsarnaev's life by presenting evidene
that could mitigate his guilt.
Among the victims in the courtroom was Heather Abbott, who lost a leg in the
attack. None of the victims came in on crutches or in wheelchairs; all appeared
to walk under their own power.
Tsarnaev's lawyers have made it clear they will try to show that at the time of
the attack, Tsarnaev, then 19, looked up to his older brother, Tamerlan, 26,
and was heavily influenced by him. They plan to portray Tamerlan as the
mastermind of the attack. He died in a shootout with police days after the
bombings.
But prosecutors say Dzhokhar was an equal participant who acted of his own free
will. They contend the brothers - ethnic Chechens who arrived from Russia more
than a decade ago - were driven by anger over U.S. wars in Muslim lands.
Tsarnaev faces 30 charges in the bombings and the shooting death days later of
a police officer from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Seventeen of
the charges carry the possibility of the death penalty.
Tsarnaev's lawyers fought right up until the last minute to have the trial
moved out of Massachusetts, arguing that the emotional impact of the bombings
ran too deep and too many people had personal connections to the case. Their
requests were rejected by Judge George O'Toole Jr. and a federal appeals court.
The panel of 10 women and 8 men was chosen Tuesday after 2 long months of jury
selection, interrupted repeatedly by snowstorms and the requests to move the
trial.
The trial will be split into 2 phases - 1 to decide guilt or innocence, the
other to determine punishment. If Tsarnaev is convicted, the jury will decide
whether he gets life in prison or death.
The trial is expected to last 3 to 4 months.
Clarke, Tsarnaev's lawyer, has saved a string of high-profile clients from the
death penalty, including Atlanta Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph; Unabomber Ted
Kaczynski; and Jared Loughner, the man who killed 6 people and gravely wounded
then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in a 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona.
(source: WCVB news)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list