[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----MO., OKLA., NEB., NEV., USA
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Sat Jun 13 15:22:46 CDT 2015
June 13
MISSOURI:
Man Accused of Killing Clerk Could Face Death Penalty
The man accused of killing a southeast Missouri store clerk could face the
death penalty if convicted.
The Sikeston Standard Democrat (http://bit.ly/1f5y2yF ) reports that
21-year-old Deion Martin of Parma is charged with 1st-degree murder, 1st-degree
robbery and armed criminal action. New Madrid County prosecutor Andrew Lawson
filed notice Wednesday that he will seek the death penalty.
Brenda Smith was fatally shot during a robbery on May 18 at D and L One Stop in
Parma. She was 59. Police say she was shot after refusing to open the store's
safe.
(source: Associated Press)
**************
Jefferson County Wants Death For Sheley
If Nicholas Sheley of Illinois is convicted of murder in Jefferson County, he
may get the death penalty.
The prosecuting attorney is seeking death against Sheley who allegedly killed
an Arkansas couple in Festus in June of 2008.
He's accused of killing Thomas and Jill Estes in the Comfort Inn parking lot.
The bodies of the 55 and 54-year-old were later discovered dumped behind a
trash can at a Phillips 66 on American Legion Drive.
The 35-year-old Sheley is already serving life in Illinois for 6 1st degree
murder convictions.
He will be arraigned in Jefferson County on July 6th.
(source: mymoinfo.com)
OKLAHOMA:
As Lethal Injection Decision Nears, Oklahoma Court Permits Open Records Lawsuit
on Botched Execution to Move Forward
As the anticipated late-June decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Oklahoma
lethal injection case, Glossip v. Gross, approaches, the Oklahoma state courts
have ruled that a media lawsuit seeking discovery and depositions relating to
the state's botched execution of Clayton Lockett may proceed. On June 8, the
Oklahoma Supreme Court unanimously denied a motion filed by Oklahoma Governor
Mary Fallin to block action in Branstetter v. Fallin, a lawsuit filed by the
Reporters Committee on Freedom of the Press on behalf Tulsa Frontier editor
Ziva Branstetter and the Tulsa World. As described by Branstetter, the lawsuit
seeks disclosure of "why attorneys [for Oklahoma] blacked out hundreds of
sentences and dozens of pages in interview transcripts related to the
execution." Oklahoma has for more than a year failed to act on an open records
law request for these records. Branstetter says "[t]he secrecy surrounding the
execution almost certainly contributed to the 'procedural disaster' and
international criticism that followed. But the secrecy continues."
Among other matters, the identities of 23 of the 101 people interviewed by the
Oklahoma Department of Public in its investigation of the Lockett execution
were never disclosed. Records that were disclosed revealed that the prison
staff had felt pressured by having to conduct two executions on the same night
and that the doctor who was present at the execution -- described as the
state's "3rd choice" -- had said he received not received any training other
than that he would be asked to pronouce death after the execution. She said the
records showed that "Lockett had to help the medical team find a vein but the
IV still failed, possibly because DOC lacked the right needles." Branstetter
said another record disclosed that prison warden Anita Trammell had informed
investigators that the state attorney general's office had prepared and asked
to her sign an affidavit stating that she had verified the pharmacist's license
and the expiration dates on the lethal drugs, when she had not done so.
(source: Death Penalty Information Center)
NEBRASKA:
New Coalition supports death penalty repeal
The heated death penalty debate is gathering more steam. This time its from
those who support the repeal.
A state-wide coalition called Nebraskans for Public Safety forms to show others
that there is public support for the repeal.
The group looking to put capitol punishment to a vote, Nebraskans for the Death
Penalty, is already gathering signatures before their August 27th deadline. On
May 27th, Nebraska lawmakers voted to override the governor's veto.
But the newly formed Nebraskans for Public Safety is an effort by people and
groups including the ACLU, Nebraska Innocence Project, faith and conservative
leaders.
"It was a bipartisan decision it really was. I think there was a lot of
misinformation out there that Nebraskans weren't being represented and this
isn't what they really want," said Bryan Bumgart, the former chairman of the
Douglas County Republican Party.
They want to educate people about the state's broken system. And they're
recruiting volunteers on their website to make sure people on the other side
are property collecting petition signatures.
The group also includes retired Sarpy County District Court Judge Ronald
Reagan, who was on the panel that sentenced john joubert to death. He says in
his expereience capital punishment was never a deterrant.
"Whether they're predisposed to commit murder or some heat of the passion
moment they have absolutely no thought that they'll be either appreheneded or
punished," Hon. Regean explained.
Nebraskans for the Death Penalty will need more than 56,000 signatures to get
the issue on the november 2016 ballot.
(source: scrippsmedia.com)
****************
Scottsbluff graduate works to change Nebraska views about the death penalty
Imagine that Nebraska's governor is a Democrat (OK, it's a stretch. Work with
me). Imagine further that he purchases $50,000 of marijuana in Colorado to ease
the suffering of cancer patients, in defiance of the Legislature, after failing
to gain support for legalizing medical marijuana.
Law-and-order conservatives would go hysterical.
Yet after a bloc of Republican lawmakers helped to make Nebraska the 1st red
state in ages to end the death penalty, supposedly pro-life, tight-fisted Gov.
Pete Ricketts turned to the black market to spend $54,400 on an illegal poison
in an attempt to exterminate Nebraska's 10 death row inmates. While $5,440
apiece might seem expensive, he paid for enough to kill 300 people - although
only 17 people have been legally executed in Nebraska history.
The website Buzzfeed noted that HarrisPharma, run in India by a man named Chris
Harris, not only sold Ricketts the drugs without Food and Drug Administration
approval, Nebraska officials made little effort to verify that the deal was
legal.
"When he sent the invoice, Harris described the shipment as 'harmless
medicine,' probably not the most accurate way to describe drugs intended for an
execution," noted Buzzfeed, which published copies of state emails related to
the transaction. It also noted that Nebraska paid $25 per vial of sodium
thiopental - "about 7 times more than what the drug typically costs."
The Omaha World-Herald reports that prison officials are trying to have the
chemical shipped as a controlled substance through the Drug Enforcement
Administration, though the scheme faces little chance of federal approval.
Apparently, Ricketts believes he can still carry out executions. Elsewhere,
Americans are wondering if the governor has lost his mind.
Against that backdrop, a former Scottsbluff woman is working to convince
Nebraskans that it's time to let capital punishment die a well-deserved and
peaceful death.
Stacy Anderson, 34, is executive director of Nebraskans for Alternatives to the
Death Penalty. A 1999 graduate of Scottsbluff High School, she attended Western
Nebraska Community College and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln to study
political science. And, like many lawmakers who voted to repeal the death
penalty, she's a conservative Republican.
"I've always been a political nerd and involved in politics," Anderson said. "I
knew in 7th grade I was going to be a political science major."
After graduation, she went to work in the GOP office in Lincoln.
"I think my title was finance assistant, but I did everything. I worked in
campaigns."
While living in Scottsbluff she had known Heather Guerrero, a 15-year-old
newspaper carrier who was raped and murdered by Jeffrey Hessler, one of the 10
men now on death row. That was more than 12 years ago.
"Somebody told me that he'd never be executed. I thought that was strange, and
I wanted to know why," Anderson said. "I read 25 books about the death penalty.
When I learned about all the problems with it, I knew that I had to do
something about it."
She took the job with NADP, where she and a small staff do lobbying and
educational outreach work, often putting her at odds with fellow Republicans.
"I never in a million years expected to be doing this full time," she said.
Although capital punishment remains popular in Nebraska - a drive is under way
to reinstate it - politicians and judges have long lacked the political will to
carry it out. It's been 18 years since the last execution. The longest serving
prisoner on death row has been there since 1980, before Anderson was born.
What changed her thinking, she said, is the risk of executing an innocent
person and a revulsion for the notion of observing a hierarchy of murders.
"We create a class of victims when we talk about 'the worst of the worst.' To a
mother, any murder is heinous," she said. "You can't tell a mother that her
child's death was just common."
The millions of taxpayer dollars spent on appeals should be directed instead
toward helping the families of victims with counseling, offering compensation
for time lost from work while grieving and with burial costs, she said.
"Nebraska is dead last in providing victim services. We're spending millions on
trying to kill these people. It's a misplaced priority. We should end the
charade and actually take care of victims.:
Meanwhile, other like-minded conservatives now oppose capital punishment
because it no longer aligns with their values, she said. While repeal has
inflamed many who still see the death penalty as justifiable revenge for
murder, it has also generated a lot of support.
"Reasonable people can disagree on this issue," Anderson said. "Many Nebraskans
feel we can live without it. As public policy it's not serving us well."
As for Hessler and the others on death row, she said, it's more appropriate to
let them live out their lives behind bars, in obscurity, rather than return to
the public eye every time the issue gets debated.
"We should never hear their names again."
(source: Steve Frederick, Editor, Star-Herald)
NEVADA:
Shuttered Nevada prison closer to being tourist attraction
To see the Nevada State Prison in Carson City is to understand why lawmakers
decided to shut it down three years ago. The site, which housed prisoners even
before Nevada became a state 150 years ago, features cramped cells, uneven
walkways and the kinds of blind spots that would leave corrections officers
patrolling the yard nervous.
But an enthusiastic group of history buffs, including some who once worked as
guards there, see the fossil-laden, sandstone-block structure as the next
Alcatraz - a tourist attraction steeped in lore of prison breaks, Wild West
personalities and outlaw antics.
"From a correctional standpoint, it's awful," said Glen Whorton, a former
prison guard and head of the prison's preservation society.
"But from a design standpoint, it's awesome," former guard Terry Hubert added.
The Nevada State Prison Preservation Society scored a win this legislative
session when lawmakers approved AB377, a bill sponsored by Carson City's
Republican Assemblyman P.K. O'Neill. The measure sets up a process for the
state to designate portions of the 153-year-old complex for cultural use,
establishes a funding mechanism and sets groundwork for eventual tours.
But even proponents acknowledge that the opening day of a functional museum is
far off. Despite closing in 2012, the state's correctional department still
operates a license plate manufacturing plant and Nevada's only functioning
execution chamber on prison grounds.
Plus, the state hasn't allocated money to prison preservation efforts or
conducted feasibility studies on the buildings, meaning substantial financial
assistance is needed to move the project forward.
"There's too many variables to give you an exact date," O'Neill said.
Yet preservation advocates say the prison, which operated as the state's only
correctional institution until 1964, drips with historical appeal as the site
of inmate escapes and the nation's only prisoner-operated casino. Founded 2
years after Nevada became a territory in 1862, the prison has housed everyone
from mining boom-era "desperadoes" to card cheats from Las Vegas.
The National Park Service is reviewing a lengthy application for the prison to
be put of the National Register of Historic Places.
The application details the prison's history, including an 1871 jailbreak in
which about 30 prisoners escaped and engaged in a gun battle with warden John
Franklin Denver, who also was the state's lieutenant governor.
The prison's execution chamber hasn't been used since 2007 and can't be used
because the steep stairs up to the witness chamber are out of compliance with
the Americans with Disabilities Act. Lawmakers voted this session to approve
$860,000 to build an execution chamber in Ely State Prison - a decision that
drew criticism from death penalty foes.
The prison also holds a place in death penalty history as the site of the
nation's first gas chamber execution in 1924.
If the prison opens to tours, it would join Alcatraz and numerous other prisons
in the U.S. that have become tourist attractions.
"People are interested in prisons and want to see the inside of them," said
Sean Kelley, senior vice president at the Eastern State Penitentiary Historic
Site in Philadelphia, which draws about 400,000 visitors a year. "There's a
taboo that you'll never get to go inside a prison."
Kelley said Eastern State, which opened in 1829, closed in 1971 and opened as a
cultural attraction in 1994, isn't above holding a spooky fundraiser every
Halloween. But the rest of the year, it sees itself as a place for tourists to
grapple with questions about mass incarceration.
"We have all intentions to be the place in the U.S. to look for the most
substantial conversations about the criminal justice system today," Kelley
said. "We're coming out of a real tough-on-crime era, and no one realized how
tough on crime we were being . There's bipartisan interest in looking at our
prisons."
Proponents of the Nevada project are organizing a ceremonial bill signing and
barbecue with the Carson City Chamber of Commerce to generate interest in the
restoration.
O'Neill said the prison would offer one more reason for visitors to stop by
Nevada's capital city.
"Europeans love the Wild West, and are enthralled by any building that can take
you back to the western days," he said. "The Nevada State Prison will fit that
bill."
(source: Las Vegas Sun)
USA:
Death penalty can never be undone
To the Honorable Antonin G. Scalia, associate justice of the Supreme Court of
the United States:
Dear Sir:
21 years ago, your then-colleague, the late Justice Harry Blackmun, wrote what
became a famous dissent to a Supreme Court decision not to review a Texas death
penalty conviction. In it, Blackmun declared that he had become convinced "the
death penalty experiment has failed" and said he considered capital punishment
irretrievably unconstitutional.
The death penalty, he wrote, "remains fraught with arbitrariness,
discrimination ... and mistake. ... From this day forward, I no longer shall
tinker with the machinery of death."
You mocked him for this stance in an opinion concurring with the majority,
invoking as justification for capital punishment the horrific 1983 case of an
11-year-old girl who was raped then killed by having her panties stuffed down
her throat. "How enviable a quiet death by lethal injection," you wrote,
"compared with that!"
A few months later, the very case you had referenced came before the court.
Henry Lee McCollum, a mentally disabled man who was on death row in North
Carolina after having been convicted of that rape and murder, applied to the
court for a review of his case. You were part of the majority that rejected the
request without comment.
The demagoguery of your response to Justice Blackmun is pretty standard for
proponents of state-sanctioned death. Rather than contend with the many logical
and irrefutable arguments against capital punishment, they use a brute-force
appeal to emotion. Certain crimes, they say, are so awful, heinous and vile
that they cry out for the ultimate sanction. For you, Sabrina Buie's rape and
murder was one of those, a symbol of why we need the death penalty.
As you have doubtless heard, it now turns out McCollum was innocent of that
crime. Last year, he and his also mentally disabled half-brother Leon Brown
(who had been serving a life sentence) were exonerated by DNA evidence and set
free. A few days ago, McCollum was pardoned by North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory.
The case against him was never what you'd call ironclad. No physical evidence
tied him to the crime. The centerpiece of the prosecution's case was a
confession McCollum, then a 19-year-old said to have the mentality of a child
10 years younger, gave with no lawyer present after 5 hours of questioning. "I
had never been under this much pressure," he told the News & Observer newspaper
in a videotaped death row interview, "with a person hollering at me and
threatening me ... I just made up a false story so they could let me go home."
But he didn't go home for over 30 years. You and your colleagues had a chance
to intervene in that injustice and chose not to. Not incidentally, the real
culprit avoided accountability all that time.
The argument against the death penalty will never have the visceral, immediate
emotionalism of the argument in favor. It does not satisfy that instinctive
human need to make somebody pay - now! - when something bad has been done.
Rather, it turns on quieter concerns, issues of inherent racial, class,
geographic and gender bias, issues of corner-cutting cops and ineffective
counsel, and issues of irrevocability, the fact that, once imposed, death
cannot be undone.
Those issues were easy for you to ignore in mocking Blackmun. They are always
easy to ignore, right up until the moment they are not. This is one of those
moments, sir, and it raises a simple and obvious question to which one would
hope you feel honor bound to respond. In 1994, you used this case as a symbol
of why we need the death penalty.
What do you think it symbolizes now?
(source: Leonard Pitts Jr., is a columnist for the Miami Herald; Idaho
Statesman)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list