[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----CONN., PENN., GA., ALA., IND., KY.
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Sat Dec 5 09:27:56 CST 2015
Dec. 5
CONNECTICUT:
Man whose case led to ruling against Connecticut death penalty resentenced to
life in prison
A former death row inmate whose appeal resulted in capital punishment being
eliminated in Connecticut has been resentenced to life in prison without the
possibility of parole.
Hartford Superior Court Judge Carl Taylor sentenced 36-year-old Eduardo
Santiago on Friday for a 2000 murder-for-hire killing in West Hartford.
Prosecutors say Santiago shot 45-year-old Joseph Niwinski in exchange for a
pink-striped snowmobile with a broken clutch.
Santiago, whose death sentence previously had been overturned, was facing the
possibility of it being reinstated when the state Supreme Court ruled on his
appeal in August. A divided court found that capital punishment "no longer
comports with contemporary standards of decency" and doesn't serve any penal
purpose.
The state had eliminated the death penalty in 2012, except for those who were
already facing capital punishment.
(source: Associated press)
PENNSYLVANIA:
Upper Merion double-murderer wants detective prosecuted for lying
A convicted double-killer sitting on death row wants to pursue criminal charges
against the Montgomery County detective who headed the investigation that
resulted in his arrest.
A hearing that would allow Raghunandan Yandamuri to file a private criminal
complaint against Detective Paul Bradbury is scheduled for Jan. 5, according to
a court order filed Friday in county court.
Yandamuri, 29, formerly of Upper Merion, initially petitioned the county
district attorney's office, which includes the county detective bureau, to
arrest Bradbury on charges of perjury and/or false swearing.
The district attorney's office rejected that request.
"We reviewed Mr. Yandamuri's filings and found them to be without merit," said
Deputy District Attorney Thomas McGoldrick, chief of trials.
Now, Yandamuri, who represented himself at his own criminal trial, wants to
file a private criminal complaint.
In that approximate 177-page private criminal complaint, Yandamuri alleges that
Bradbury perjured himself or gave false or misleading testimony on at least 13
different occasions.
For example, Yandamuri claims that during the suppression hearing aimed at
barring his written and video confessions to be used as evidence against him at
his trial, Bradbury testified Yandamuri was free to leave the Upper Merion
police station where he was being questioned even after he had been given his
Miranda warnings.
At trial, Yandamuri alleges in his complaint, Bradbury testified that Yandamuri
was in police custody and was not free to leave after given his Miranda
warnings.
"Had Mr. Bradbury been truthful at suppression hearing, there is a reasonable
likelihood ... the outcome might have been different," Yandamuri said in the
complaint.
A jury in October 2014 convicted Yandamuri in the stabbing death of 61-year-old
Satyavathi Venna and the suffocation death of her 10-month-old granddaughter
Saanvi Venna in a botched kidnapping-for-ransom plot. The same jury that found
Yandamuri guilty on 2 1st-degree murder charges then deliberated again during
the penalty phase, returning with 2 death penalty decisions for the double
killings.
The charges against Yandamuri stem from an investigation that began Oct. 22,
2012, when Upper Merion police were dispatched to the Marquis Apartments
complex in response to a 911 call reporting both a killing and a missing child.
When they arrived, they found the body of the grandmother in the kitchen.
The grandmother, a native of India, had arrived in the United States in June
2012 for a 6-month visit to see her new grandchild.
Police could not find the baby but they did find a ransom note asking the
parents for $50,000 in cash. That note included the nicknames of the parents,
nicknames known only to close family friends.
Yandamuri, who had been befriended by the parents and lived in the same
apartment complex, was brought to the police station for questioning on Oct.
25, 2012. After initially denying involvement in the incident, Yandamuri
admitted he was responsible for the death of the grandmother and the baby,
according to the criminal complaint.
Acting on information that Yandamuri gave them, authorities found the baby's
body in an unused sauna in another building at the apartment complex at about 4
a.m. on Oct. 26, 2012.
Yandamuri gave both a written and videotaped confession but later maintained
those confessions were coerced from him by detectives. He has filed appeals
aimed at having his murder convictions and his death sentences overturned.
Yandamuri currently is being housed at the state prison in Greene County.
The state places most of its death-row inmates in this maximum security
facility in the southwestern section of the state.
(source: The Intelligencer)
GEORGIA----impending execution
Man set to die Tuesday again challenges Georgia's execution drug
A lawyer for condemned murderer Brian Keith Terrell is again raising questions
about the compounded lethal injection drug that Georgia uses in executions.
Terrell is scheduled to die on Tuesday. He was originally slated for execution
on March 10, 1 week after the scheduled execution of female death row inmate
Kelly Gissendaner.
Both of those executions were put on hold temporarily when the compounded
lethal injection drug, pentobarbital, turned cloudy. But Gissendaner was
eventually executed in September after the state decided the drug's cloudiness
was caused by how it was stored, not how it was made.
Now, in an appeal filed Thursday in Fulton County Superior Court, Terrell???s
attorney argues the Georgia Department of Corrections never truly discovered
what caused the problem, so the agency continues to insist cold temperatures
caused clumps to form in the pentobarbital.
Terrell's lawyer, Bo King, wrote in the appeal that information obtained under
the Georgia Open Records Act indicate there were problems with 2 batches of
pentobarbital, not just 1, suggesting the cloudiness might not be an isolated
incident.
"It is only a matter of time before the drugs - compounded by an unknown
pharmacy using unknown ingredients in unknown circumstances - become defective
again," King wrote.
The attorney also wrote that the defense team's expert on compounding drugs
reviewed state records but was limited by Georgia's secrecy law. The drug
expert, Michael Jay, decided other circumstances could have caused the problem
with the pentobarbital.
Jay, a professor of pharmaceutical sciences and bio-medical engineering at the
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, wrote in a document attached to
Terrell's appeal that if officials had not noticed a problem with the drug and
had used it as intended in March, Gissendaner - and later Terrell - would have
suffered excruciating pain.
Jay wrote that he suspects the compounding pharmacist who made those batches of
drugs used the wrong active ingredient - pentobarbital rather than
pentobarbital sodium. Either that, or the pH solution in the compounded drug
was incorrect.
If those executions had been carried out using the drugs, Jay wrote, it's
possible that particulate matter in the pentobarbital would have lodged in
blood vessels or the lungs. It would be akin to being injected with "very small
pieces of glass," Jay wrote.
The sources of Georgia's lethal injection drug, and the state secrecy shrouding
that information, is an issue that has been raised several times in appeals.
Repeatedly the courts have upheld the use of pentobarbital and have ruled that
Georgia can keep secret its drug sources to protect pharmacists from public
pressure.
Terrell is scheduled to be executed at 7 p.m. Tuesday for the 1992 murder of
John Watson, his mother's friend. Terrell stole about $8,700 from the
70-year-old man by stealing blank checks. Watson told Terrell's mother he
wouldn't press charges if Terrell returned most of the money. 2 days later,
Terrell attacked Watson as he left his Newton County house for a dialysis
appointment.
Fulton Superior Court Judge Ural Glanville will hold a hearing Monday on
Terrell's latest appeal. At the same time, the state Board of Pardons and
Paroles will hear his petition for clemency.
(source: myajc.com)
******
Death row inmate's lawyers say Georgia hasn't resolved problem with its
execution drug
Lawyers for a Georgia death row inmate say the drug the state plans to use for
his execution Tuesday risks violating his constitutional rights.
In a court filing Thursday, lawyers for Brian Keith Terrell say the state still
doesn't know what caused clumps to appear in its compounded pentobarbital
earlier this year. They say that means problems could arise again and cause
serious harm to their client.
Terrell is scheduled to die Tuesday at 7 p.m. at the state prison in Jackson.
Terrell was on parole in June 1992 when he stole and forged checks belonging to
a friend of his mother, 70-year-old John Watson. Prosecutors say Terrell was
supposed to return the money but instead shot Watson multiple times and then
severely beat him.
(source: Associated Press)
ALABAMA----new death sentence
Jury recommends death for Towles
Jurors deliberated about an hour Friday before returning a unanimous
recommendation that Kevin Andre Towles be sentenced to die for the beating
death of Geontae Glass.
After the recommendation was returned, defense attorneys seemed to be
comforting Towles, with arms around his shoulders, and at times he seemed to be
doing the same for them.
Etowah County Circuit Judge David Kimberley set sentencing for Towles at 10
a.m. March 19, when he will determine whether to follow the jury's
recommendation of the death sentence or impose a sentence of life without
parole.
Towles was convicted and sentenced to die in 2009 for the boy's death, but the
case was returned for a new trial by the appeals court.
The 2nd conviction came exactly 9 years after prosecutors believe Geontae died
from complications of repeated beatings, administered over the course of a
weekend.
Defense attorney Dani Bone said this verdict will be appealed as well. He said
it's too early to say what grounds there might be for appeal. He said the judge
did a fine job protecting the record, and complimented the work of his legal
team and the state.
"It's difficult to deal with a verdict like this, but in this line of work, it
happens," Sam Bone, another of Towles' attorneys, said.
Dani Bone said appeal is automatic in a death penalty case.
"We continue to believe Andre is not guilty of the underlying crime," he said.
He added that he expects the case to be reversed and for Towles to be
exonerated.
Etowah County District Attorney Jody Willoughby said his office thanked the
jurors for their service.
"It's been a long road for them, a difficult road," he said. "I couldn't be
more proud of the work our office did - and that's all the office - not just
the ones in court."
Willoughby said Geontae Glass' family also wanted to express its thanks to
jurors.
The decision on the sentence recommendation came quickly. Jurors took a lunch
break before beginning deliberations; they returned to the judicial building at
1:15 p.m. and had a decision by 2:30 p.m.
Friday morning, jurors heard from Geontae Glass' mother.
Shalinda Glass told jurors her spirit and her flesh differed in what they would
recommend for Towles' fate. Jurors found Towles guilty Thursday in the beating
death of Glass' 5-year-old son.
The response of the flesh was that of a mother speaking, she said.
"As a mother, I want the death penalty," Glass said. "As a born-again believer,
life without parole. God holds all people in his hands. With life without, at
least my family would know that he won't hurt any other family and put them
through what we've been through."
Glass appeared before jurors in a striped inmate uniform. She pleaded guilty in
2012 to a charge of felony murder in her son's death. She said she took
responsibility for her role in Geontae's death - failing to protect him from
Towles and participating in an attempted cover-up.
She answered questions before Kimberley prior to testifying for jurors, to see
what her responses would be.
Dani Bone asked if she would recommend that jurors spare Towles' life.
"Did he spare my son's life?" Glass said, responding forcefully to the
attorney's question.
"I'm to the point that I've forgiven him, because I have to, to have a
relationship with God," she said. "If I want to see my son again, I have to
forgive him. I would do anything to see my son again."
"In the afterlife?" Chief Deputy District Attorney Marcus Reid asked, and Glass
said yes.
She paused, apparently considering, when Reid asked what sentence she thought
justice required.
"Life without (parole)," she said, then explained. "Death would give him
something to look forward to. With life without, he'll have lots and lots of
years to think about what he's done. That would be torture."
During a break before the jury was brought in, Glass was allowed to approach
her mother, Linda Glass Starr, with a big smile and a hug. They were allowed to
visit in an area outside the courtroom before testimony resumed.
Speaking in front of the jury, Glass said the sentence Towles received was up
to them.
"I trust them to do what they do," she said.
Prior to Glass' testimony, the state read into evidence testimony given by
Towles' son, Shaquille Cameron, in 2009, about a incident when he was about 9
years old. He said Towles came into his room and saw he had a lot of drinking
cups that he'd not put away. He said Towles picked up a box fan and hit him in
the head with it. He said he cried, then went to school with a golf-ball sized
knot on his head.
He said Towles cried after hitting him. At school, friends, then teachers
noticed the knot and the principal took him to the Department of Human
Resources. He was removed from Towles' custody.
In closing arguments, Deputy District Attorney Carol Griffith told jurors to
consider two aggravating factors: that Towles had a prior conviction for armed
robbery and that the crime was especially heinous, atrocious and cruel.
"Geontae was beaten over a period of time," Griffith said. "He laid there all
day long without help, without mercy and he died."
Bone argued the state didn't prove the crime was heinous, atrocious and cruel.
"Nobody said they saw an atrocious beating. There's inference that it must have
happened," he said. "Someone should have noticed he was suffering, crying,
hurting," if the incident was that bad.
"The evidence isn't there," he said. "Mere speculation isn't enough."
Sam Bone said a sentence of life without parole meant Towles will die in
prison. He would never get out, he said, but he might be able to mentor an
inmate who would.
"He could tell them, 'Don't make my mistakes,'" he said.
Sam Bone told jurors a death penalty would bring nine levels of automatic
appeals and keep the victim's family awaiting court proceedings for years to
come. Give them closure, he said, by putting Towles in a cell for the rest of
his days.
Reid told jurors to make no mistake, the case would be appealed no matter what
sentence they recommended.
He told jurors it was hard for them to consider sentencing someone to death. He
said it's hard for the prosecution to ask them to.
"But it wasn't hard for him," Reid said, pointing at Towles, to take the boy
outside that Sunday morning in December 2006 and "beat him so hard he couldn't
walk, then carry him in and lay him in the floor and where he laid and suffered
all day.
"It wasn't hard for him to tell all those lies."
Reid said many good people have testified, asking for mercy for Towles.
"They're hurting," Reid said. "But they're not our victims. They're not your
victims. They are victims of Kevin Andre Towles, too."
Reid said it's the jury's duty to determine if the death penalty is appropriate
in this case. He urged them to look again at the photos of Geontae Glass' body,
taken at autopsy.
"Think about what Geontae was thinking," Reid said. "He loved that man.
"The state of our souls is between us and God," he said. "What does justice
call for?"
(source: Gadsden Times)
*********
Alabama death row inmate asks federal judge to stay execution
Attorneys for Alabama death row inmate Christopher Brooks, convicted in the
1992 murder of a Homewood woman, on Friday asked a federal judge to block
Brooks' scheduled execution next month.
The judge on Friday set a hearing for Dec. 18 on Brooks' emergency petition.
Meanwhile, the Alabama Attorney General's Office, at the judge's request,
submitted a proposal Friday to change the state's 3-drug lethal injection
method to use of just one of the drugs for Brooks' execution.
The Alabama Supreme Court on Nov. 23 set Brooks' execution date for Jan. 21.
Brooks had exhausted his direct appeals and the Alabama Attorney General's
Office on Sept. 24 asked the Alabama Supreme Court to set an execution date.
John Palombi, assistant federal defender with the Middle District of Alabama,
said they filed a motion Friday asking U.S. District Court Judge Keith Watkins
to stay Brooks' execution. "We asked the Court to do so to allow Mr. Brooks'
case to proceed to a final hearing with the other 5 plaintiffs (death row
inmates) in the litigation challenging Alabama's method of execution," he said
in an email.
Death row inmates are challenging the use of the drug midazolam as part of the
drug combination Alabama plans to use for lethal injections.
"Alabama has not yet carried out an execution using midazolam in either a
1-drug or a 3-drug protocol," Palombi said. "The time to evaluate whether such
a protocol creates an unreasonable risk of severe pain is not after an
execution using a new protocol, but before."
"In requesting this stay and also asking the Alabama Supreme Court to vacate
its order setting his execution date, Mr. Brooks is only asking the state to
wait for the resolution of the evidentiary hearing that is already scheduled
and which will address these crucial constitutional and human rights
questions," Palombi said.
The Alabama Attorney General's Office declined to comment on the motion seeking
a halt to Brooks' execution or its motion filed Friday asking Watkins to
approve a 1-drug protocol.
The AG's office, however, still believes its 3-drug protocol is constitutional,
according to court documents.
Watkins in an order issued Tuesday had given the AG's office until Friday to
file that motion.
The judge also gave Brooks' attorneys until noon Tuesday (Dec. 8) for file
their response to the AG's proposed 1-drug midazolam protocol. The judge also
gave the AG's office until Dec. 11 to respond to Brooks' emergency motion to
stay his execution.
Brooks last month joined other Alabama death row inmates in filing federal
lawsuits challenging Alabama's proposed 3-drug protocol for lethal injections.
That protocol calls for an injection of 500 milligrams of midazolam
hydrochloride followed by 600 milligrams of rocuronium bromide to stop
breathing, and then 240 "milliequivalents" of potassium chloride to stop the
heart.
Based on a previous U.S. Supreme Court ruling, in order to prevail on an Eighth
Amendment method-of-execution claims of cruel and unusual punishment, inmates
must name an alternative to the current method that is "feasible, readily
implemented" and significantly reduces a substantial risk of severe pain.
When Brooks filed his lawsuit he listed 3 lethal injection alternatives - 2 of
which the state says it can no longer get. The 3rd was the single dose of
midazolam.
After other inmates also suggested a single-dose of midazolam as an
alternative, the AG's office called their bluff and agreed for just their
executions.
Watkins had rejected a few other death row inmates suggestion for a firing
squad or hanging.
Brooks was convicted in 1993 of murder during the course of a rape, robbery,
and burglary for killing Jo Deann Campbell. A jury recommended Brooks receive
the death penalty and a judge sentenced him to death.
According to the appeal court records Campbell and Brooks had met while working
as counselors at a camp in New York state. On Dec. 31, 1992, her body was found
under the bed in the bedroom of her Homewood apartment. She had been bludgeoned
to death, and was naked from the waist down.
DNA taken from semen found in the victim's body, a palm print on one of
Campbell's ankles, and bloody fingerprints on her bedroom door were all linked
to Brooks.
A friend of Brooks, who also was at the apartment, was not indicted on charges.
(source: al.com)
INDIANA:
Court appearance for man charged in fatally shooting an Indianapolis police
officer postponed
A court appearance for a man charged with murder in the 2014 shooting death of
an Indianapolis police officer has been postponed until next week.
Major Davis Jr. was scheduled to appear in court Friday for several motions
involving his case, but it was postponed until Dec. 11.
He's accused of killing Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Officer
Perry Renn in a July 2014 gun battle. Davis was critically hurt.
Davis could face the death penalty if convicted of killing Renn.
(source: Associated Press)
KENTUCKY:
3 people indicted for murder in April shooting death of UK student ---- Efrain
Diaz, Justin D. Smith and a 17-year-old have been charged with fatally shooting
Jonathan Krueger, a junior at the University of Kentucky, on April 17.
Prosecutors say they are ready to set a trial date for the 3 people charged in
the fatal shooting of a University of Kentucky student killed during a robbery
in April.
During a hearing Friday in Fayette Circuit Court, attorneys said lab results
for ballistic tests are in and DNA results will be available by the end of the
month.
Efrain Diaz Jr., Justin Delone Smith and Roman Gonzalez Jr. were indicted in
June on charges of murder and 1st-degree robbery. Smith also is charged with
tampering and fleeing or evading police.
Police have charged Diaz, 20, Smith, 18, and Gonzalez, 17, with killing Krueger
during a robbery about 2 a.m. April 17 at Transylvania Park and East Maxwell
Street. Krueger, a Perrysburg, Ohio native, died from a gunshot wound to the
chest, according to the Fayette County Coroner.
Krueger -- the photo editor for The Kentucky Kernel, the University of
Kentucky's student newspaper -- was walking down East Maxwell Street with Aaron
Gillette, a friend, when police say the three suspects approached the 2
students.
Police have said the group hopped out of a van, pulled guns on Krueger and
Gillette and demanded cash. Krueger and Gillette complied with those demands,
and then their attackers started demanding more. The detective said Gillette
tried to grab the gun and a physical exchange ensued and the gun was fired;
Krueger was fighting with the juvenile. Gillette said he was fleeing when he
heard multiple gunshots.
Witnesses saw a van leave the scene, and investigators later saw a van that
matched that description. The van fled from police, but officers were able to
run the plates, which came back to Justin Smith's mother.
Diaz and Smith admitted to police they were involved but they said Gonzalez
shot and killed Krueger.
On Friday, Brent Cox, Diaz's attorney, said he has not seen the lab results yet
but he hopes the results will back up that claim.
"If my client didn't shoot anybody he's not a murderer. If they choose to
charge him with complicity we will look and see what actions they're saying he
took were complicit," he said.
Diaz's attorney says both Diaz and Smith could face the death penalty if they
are convicted of murder. Gonzalez is facing a life-sentence with parole
considered after 25 years because he is a juvenile.
Attorneys think the case will go to trial at the end of 2016. A bond hearing is
scheduled for Jan. 15.
(source: WKYT news)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list