[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----ALA.

[Rick Halperin]

Aug. 22



ALABAMA:

'Unhinged' Woman Gets Death For Boy's Murder


Heather Leavell-Keaton cooked anti-freeze into the food of 3-year-old Chase 
DeBlase and his sister Natalie.

A woman has been sentenced to death by lethal injection for the 2010 murder of 
her common-law husband's 3-year-old son.

Heather Leavell-Keaton intentionally killed Chase DeBlase, and recklessly 
caused the death of his 4-year-old sister Natalie, a jury in Alabama found.

The prosecution alleged that Leavell-Keaton cooked anti-freeze into the 
children's food, and told the court that they were tortured, gagged and choked 
to death.

Chase and Natalie's bodies were found dumped in woods near Citronelle, Alabama, 
and Vancleave, Mississippi.

John DeBlase, their father, was sentenced to death in 2014.

Judge Roderick Stout upheld a jurors' recommendation at Mobile County Circuit 
Court on Thursday.

He ruled that Leavell-Keaton had failed to protect the children from "needless 
suffering and death an unexplainable malice", AL.com reported. The website also 
reported that she is the 1st woman in Mobile County to be put on death row.

Mobile District Attorney Ashley Reich told the website: "We believe that 
Heather Keaton ... is a domineering, manipulative, deceitful and morally 
unhinged woman.

"Her actions are worthy of the death penalty."

Greg Hughes, defending, told the court Leavell-Keaton had suffered from bipolar 
disorder from a young age and had lived with partial blindness throughout her 
life.

(source: Sky News)

**************

One Lawyer's Fight For Young Blacks And 'Just Mercy'


This is FRESH AIR. I'm David Bianculli, editor of the website TV Worth 
Watching, sitting in for Terry Gross. Last April, Anthony Ray Hinton, who had 
spent 30 years on death row after being wrongly convicted in two Alabama 
shootings, was exonerated and freed thanks to persistent efforts by the Equal 
Justice Initiative. After the court's reversal of his death sentence, Hinton 
addressed the media and expressed his gratitude, starting by saying, the sun do 
shine.

ANTHONY RAY HINTON: The sun do shine. Thirty years ago, the prosecution seemed 
deemed to take my life from me. They just didn't take me from my family and 
friends. They had every intention of executing me for something I didn't do. 
But for all y'all that's snapping the cameras, I want you to know there is a 
God.

UNIDENTIFED CROWD: Amen.

HINTON: He sit high, but he looks low.

UNIDENTIFED WOMAN: Thank the Lord.

HINTON: He will destroy, but yet he will defend, and he defend me. And I just 
want to thank him. I'm not ashamed to let you know that he sent me not just a 
lawyer but the best lawyers - the best lawyers. And I couldn't have made it 
without them. And I want to say to the victims' family, I will continue to pray 
for you just as I have for 30 years - a miscarriage of justice not only to me 
but to the victims' families.

BIANCULLI: The lawyer Anthony Ray Hinton was thanking is today's guest, Bryan 
Stevenson, the man who for decades argued for Hinton's freedom. Stevenson is 
the founder and executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative, which is 
based in Alabama. His clients are people on death row, abused and neglected 
children who were prosecuted as adults and placed in adult prisons, where they 
were beaten and sexually abused, and mentally disabled people whose illnesses 
helped land them in prison where their special needs were unmet. He's argued 5 
cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and won a ruling holding that it's 
unconstitutional to sentence children to life without parole if they are 17 or 
younger and have not committed murder. Stevenson is a professor at NYU Law 
School and his awards include the MacArthur Foundation Genius Grant. A graduate 
of Harvard Law School, he grew up in what he describes as a poor and racially 
segregated settlement in Delaware. His best-selling memoir, "Just Mercy," has 
just come out in paperback. Terry interviewed him last year when the book was 
first published.

TERRY GROSS, HOST:

Bryan Stevenson, welcome back to FRESH AIR. So there's a story I want to start 
with. It's a story of something that happened to you, which leads me to believe 
you have great understanding of what happened to Michael Brown and other 
unarmed black men who were shot by the police. And this is a story about when 
you'd been practicing at the Southern Prisoners Defense Committee for about 4 
years. You're a young man in your 20s. You'd just moved into a new apartment in 
Atlanta, Ga. You had a roommate. And you got home after a long day at work. You 
sat in the car listening to Sly and the Family Stone 'cause that was, like, 
your pleasure of the day (laughter) listening to them on the radio. And then 
you see a police car that stops, and you didn't know what they were doing 
there. You didn't realize they were coming for you. So what happened?

BRYAN STEVENSON: Right. Yeah, it was late at night. I'd been working actually 
on a case involving a young man who had been killed by police in Alabama. And I 
was just really enjoying the fact that my radio was playing. It didn't usually 
play, and I was listening to these songs sitting outside my apartment. And then 
the police car pulled up, and I was curious what they were looking for. And 
they shined the light on me, and I realized that, oh, they're here for me.

And I got out of my car. I was going to explain to them that this is where I 
live. And before I could say a word, the police officer pulled a gun, pointed 
it at my head and said, move and I'll blow your head off. And I saw him 
standing there. His hands were shaking. I was terrified, and I had this moment 
of just crisis. And I put my hands up, and I began saying, it's OK, it's all 
right, it's OK, it's all right. And I was completely confused.

I had a moment where I thought these aren't real police. They were actually 
Atlanta SWAT officers, which meant that they didn't wear the traditional police 
uniform. They were all dressed in black - black boots, black pants, black 
shirt. And he was just so menacing and threatening, and he kept saying, move 
and I'll blow your head off. And a 2nd officer got out of the car, came behind 
my car, came up behind me, threw me on the back of the vehicle and wouldn't let 
me reach in my wallet to get my driver's license to show that this is where I 
lived. And it just turned into this horrible ordeal where they kept me out 
there for 15 minutes. Neighbors were coming out. People were complaining about 
other burglaries in the neighborhood. They were asking the police to 
interrogate me about their missing items. You know, ask him if he has my vacuum 
cleaner, ask him if he took my cat. And it was sort of surreal and terrifying.

One of the officers did a completely illegal search of the vehicle, went inside 
the car, started digging around, opened up the glove compartment. I had, like, 
Bazooka bubblegum and M and M candies that he went through and then tossed 
aside. And I could never persuade them that I was there legitimately. And after 
they found nothing in the car and they confirmed that they didn't have a 
warrant for me, I asked them to apologize and they wouldn't. The officer who 
left said, you should be lucky you got away. Next time, we'll get you.

GROSS: You say in the book that your 1st impulse was to run.

STEVENSON: No one had ever pointed a gun at me like that before. I was 
terrified. I just - you know, a kid growing up in the country, yeah, that was 
my 1st instinct. And I was, at that point, a lawyer who had done police 
misconduct and civil rights cases for several years. And so I knew to say, it's 
all right, it's OK, but I had to take control of that situation and calm 
everybody down and that's terrifying.

GROSS: Let me just ask you, was this neighborhood in which you were stopped, a 
neighborhood that you had just moved into, was it predominantly white?

STEVENSON: It was. My neighbor - my roommate - was actually another - was a 
classmate from Harvard Law School. And we had lived in really low-income 
sections of the city because we both were low-paid, public interest lawyers. 
And, you know, it was a middle-class, working-class neighborhood in Midtown, 
Atlanta, but most of the people on that particular block were not 
African-American. And just sitting in my car listening to music for 10 or 15 
minutes while I was actually getting my legal papers ready for the next day is 
what made me a target for this kind of assault.

GROSS: If you're just joining us, my guest is Bryan Stevenson. He's a lawyer 
who represents people on death row, children, the mentally ill. He founded the 
Equal Justice Initiative in Alabama. He also teaches at NYU, and he's the 
author of a new book called "Just Mercy: A Story Of Justice And Redemption."

At the center of your book is the story about a prisoner on death row whose 
case you took on because he always maintained his innocence. And you not only 
believed him, you found a kind of trail of clues showing you that the people 
who testified against him were lying. It was an unusual case for many reasons. 
And one of them was that the jury convicted him of life without parole, but the 
judge overturned that sentence and gave him the death penalty instead. When you 
decided to take on this appeal, a person called you who didn't - you didn't 
realize he was the judge who condemned him. And what did the judge want you to 
do? What did the judge tell you?

STEVENSON: Well, the judge didn't want me to take the case. And what was so 
surreal about this case was that all these things that weren't supposed to 
happen kept happening. You know, I went to the prison to meet him first, this 
condemned man. And he told me that he'd been placed on death row for 15 months 
before the trial. And I thought, you know, that's not what's supposed to 
happen. And then I got back to my office, and I got a call from a man named 
Robert E. Lee Key, who was the judge who had condemned him to time, who told me 
that I shouldn't take the case, that this was not the kind of case that I 
should get involved with.

And then I went to the community and met dozens of African-Americans who were 
with this condemned man at the time the crime took place 11 miles away who 
absolutely knew he was innocent. And they told the police, and the police 
didn't do anything. And it was just one thing after the other. But, yeah, it 
was a very, very bizarre start to my career and to the work that I was doing in 
Alabama. Having a judge call up and say, hi, I'm Robert E. Lee Key, and I don't 
want you taking this case, was a pretty big turnaround for me.

GROSS: Why do you think the judge did not want you to take the case?

STEVENSON: Well, I think everyone knew that the evidence against Mr. McMillian 
was pretty contrived. There was no logical sensible story about how he could 
have committed this crime. As I said, there were dozens of people who were with 
him 11 miles away. The story given by the testifying witness made absolutely no 
sense. The police couldn't solve the crime. And there was so much pressure on 
the police and the prosecutor, on the system of justice, to make an arrest that 
they just felt like they had to get somebody convicted. And I think to a 
certain extent, there was this complicit - you know, there was this complicity 
with a wrongful conviction and getting an outside lawyer might challenge that. 
I think that was one of the reasons why the judge didn't want me involved.

And the second was that it was a pretty clear situation where they just wanted 
everybody to forget about this man. Let him get executed so everybody could 
move on. The case involved a young white woman who was murdered in downtown 
Monroeville - a lot of passion, a lot of anger in the community about her 
death. And I think there was great resistance to someone coming in and fighting 
for the condemned person who had been accused and convicted.

GROSS: One of the things you found was that the sheriff and a couple of other 
law enforcement authorities basically coerced the person who testified against 
Walter McMillian, who you were representing, and it was all lies. You even 
found tapes...

STEVENSON: Yeah, it's...

GROSS: ...That had evidence of a coercion. I think they paid him, too, to do 
it. And, I mean, it's such an incredible miscarriage of justice. So, you know, 
you presented all this in court, and you got him released after being on death 
row for how long?

STEVENSON: 6 years, 6 years. And you're right, it was pretty surreal. They did 
coerce the witnesses to testify falsely against him and for some bizarre reason 
tape-recorded some of these sessions. So you hear this tape where the witness 
is saying, you want me to frame an innocent man for murder, and I don't feel 
right about that. And the police officers are saying, well, if you don't do it, 
we're going to put you on death row, too. And they actually did put the 
testifying witness on death row for a period of time until he agreed to testify 
against Mr. McMillian. Other witnesses were given money in exchange for their 
false testimony.

But it was challenging because even when we presented all of that evidence and 
we presented Mr. McMillian's strong alibi, the first couple of judges said, no, 
we're not going to grant relief. It took us 6 years to get a court to 
ultimately overturn the conviction. And I think it speaks to this resistance we 
have in this country to confronting our errors, to confronting our mistakes.

One of the really bizarre parts of this whole case for me was this whole 
episode took place in Monroeville, Ala., where Harper Lee grew up and wrote "To 
Kill A Mockingbird." And if you go to Monroeville, you'll see a community 
that's completely enchanted by that story. They love the story. They have all 
of this "To Kill A Mockingbird" memorabilia. The leading citizens enact a play 
about the book. And you can't go anywhere without encountering some aspect of 
that story made real in that community. And yet when we were trying to get the 
community to do something about an innocent African-American man wrongly 
convicted, there was this indifference - and in some quarters hostility. This 
is one of the few cases I've worked on where I got bomb threats and death 
threats because we were fighting to free this man who was so clearly innocent. 
And it just reveals this disconnect that I'm so concerned about when I think 
about our criminal justice system.

GROSS: You have cousins who are police officers. Is that a healthy connection 
for you to have in the sense that you've seen a lot of police responsible for 
mistreating people who they have arrested? You were mistreated by police very 
early in your law career. Is it helpful to be reminded that there's a lot of 
really good people who are police, including your relatives?

STEVENSON: Well, it is. But, you know, I actually am always mindful of that, 
even without that personal connection. I mean, we need law enforcement officers 
who are committed and brave and dedicated and hardworking and smart. If I had 
three professions I would double the salaries of, one would be teachers, the 
second would be police officers and law enforcement and the third would be 
social workers because I think they play a critical role in a society as 
devastated by dysfunction and drugs and racism and bias and poverty as our 
society, so I've always had that.

And I meet people all the time - law enforcement officers, correction officers 
- in the McMillian case, one of the things that turned the case around was the 
appointment of two ABI investigators who just took an honest approach to the 
case and helped us show the evidence of innocence to prosecutors. So that's 
always been clear to me that we need people performing these roles in our 
society who are uncorrupted by the cynicism, who are not distracted by bigotry 
and bias against the poor, people of color, who are informed and educated about 
the challenges of mental disability and age.

BIANCULLI: Author, professor and attorney Bryan Stevenson speaking to Terry 
Gross last year. We'll hear more of their conversation after a break. This is 
FRESH AIR.

BIANCULLI: This is FRESH AIR. Let's get back to Terry's interview from last 
year with attorney, professor and author Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Equal 
Justice Initiative. His best-selling memoir, "Just Mercy," is now out in 
paperback.

GROSS: You know, one of the stories I told myself in reading your story about 
this case was Walter McMillian, the man who was on death row who was actually 
innocent, that when he was on trial the first time around, he was probably 
represented by a lawyer who didn't really want to take the case and who didn't 
really care and didn't really spend a lot of time doing research and didn't 
present a very convincing argument in court. And then I read that one of his 
lawyers was J.L. Chestnut, who's actually a celebrated civil rights lawyer. I 
interviewed him years ago. He wrote a memoir about the civil rights movement, 
about the march, you know, on Selma.

STEVENSON: Right.

GROSS: And I couldn't understand why the case seemed to have been handled so 
poorly and yet they had this celebrated civil rights attorney.

STEVENSON: Well, I - yeah. Yeah. No, J.L. Chestnut is an amazing lawyer, and 
his co-counsel, Bruce Boynton, were both, you know, very strong advocates. And 
I think it just spoke to the resolve in that community to convict Mr. 
McMillian. If you read the transcript, you'd say no reasonable jury should 
convict this person. It's not so much that they lost the case. I think they, in 
this one instance, underestimated the resolve that some of these folks had to 
convict even an innocent person and to condemn them to die.

And, you know, I think, you know, sometimes the challenge with these cases is 
that you have to prove innocence. You can't go into court with the presumption 
of innocence, assuming that your client is presumed innocent. That's the way 
it's supposed to work, but in many of these cases, that's not the way it does 
work. And if you go into court thinking that your client is presumed innocent, 
you're going to get an outcome that is not satisfactory.

And it took hundreds of hours to kind of uncover some of the things that we had 
to uncover. The case was forced to trial. It was rushed to trial. They moved it 
out of the county, where the population is 43 % African-American, to a county 
that has less than a 10 % African-American population. And that really 
undermined the effort that his attorneys made.

GROSS: What's something I found really sad in the story is - OK, so you get 
Walter McMillian out. He's freed from death row. He's freed from prison. It's 
proven that he was not guilty of the murder. He returns to his work, which is 
in the timber business cutting down trees. He injures himself, breaks his neck, 
recovers from that partially, but then gets dementia. And not long after he's 
freed, he ends up in a home for people with dementia. And because he is not 
clear-minded anymore, he thinks he's back on death row. And I found that so 
upsetting because the mind plays such tricks on you. And to finally be freed, 
yet to then have dementia and think that you're not, that you're back on death 
row, that's such a nightmare.

STEVENSON: It is a nightmare. And I think one of the things that pains me...

GROSS: There's nothing you can do about that. As the best lawyer in the world, 
there's nothing you can do about that.

STEVENSON: No, that's right. (Laughter) Well, I think one of the things that 
pains me is that we have so tragically underestimated the trauma, the hardship 
we create in this country when we treat people unfairly, when we incarcerate 
them unfairly, when we condemn them unfairly. You can't threaten to kill 
someone every day, year after year and not harm them, not traumatize them, not 
break them in ways that is really, really profound.

And yet, when innocent people are released, we just act like they should be 
grateful that they didn't get executed. And we don't compensate them many 
times. We don't help them. We question them. We still have doubts about them. 
And I saw that create this early onset dementia - which many of the doctors 
believed was trauma-induced - was a function of his experience of being nearly 
killed. And he witnessed eight executions when he was on death row. And during 
those days, people were executed in the electric chair. And he would talk about 
smelling flesh burning as people were executed. And it was a really horrific 
experience for him.

And you're right. When that comes full circle - and he's sick, and he's in a 
hospital, and he's saying to me, you got to get me off death row again, it's 
heartbreaking. And one of the things I just wanted people to kind of understand 
is that we can't continue to have a system of justice defined by error and 
unfairness and tolerate racial bias and bias against the poor and not confront 
what we are doing to individuals and to families and to communities and to 
neighborhoods. And Walter is in some ways a kind of a microcosm of that 
reality. He's a representative of what we've done to thousands of people. And 
we ought to want to stop doing that.

BIANCULLI: Author, professor and attorney Bryan Stevenson speaking to Terry 
Gross last year. We'll continue their conversation after a break. And we'll 
also hear film critic David Edelstein's review of "Meru," a mountain climbing 
documentary that's a cliff-hanger, literally. I'm David Bianculli, and this is 
FRESH AIR.

BIANCULLI: This is FRESH AIR. I'm David Bianculli, in for Terry Gross, back 
with more of Terry's interview from last year with lawyer Bryan Stevenson. He's 
the founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, which challenges racial and 
economic inequities in our criminal justice system. His clients are people on 
death row, abused and neglected children who were prosecuted as adults and 
placed in adult prisons and the mentally disabled. His memoir, "Just Mercy," is 
now out in paperback.

GROSS: When you've represented somebody on death row and tried to get them off 
death row and fail, do you witness their execution?

STEVENSON: I have, yeah. There have been a couple of times when I've done that, 
and it's a surreal experience. I got involved in cases early on where the case 
was very close to execution. And there was really no opportunity, no meaningful 
opportunity, to stop the execution but it felt like it was important to fight 
for that condemned person anyway. Our system has really shifted over the last 
20 years. I think in the '70s when the Supreme Court upheld the death penalty, 
they said death is different. We want heightened scrutiny, heightened review.

Over the last 25 years, you've seen how that's flipped. How we are actually 
sometimes less willing to give close scrutiny to death penalty cases because 
we're in such a rush to execute people. I'm worried about the fact that we've 
elevated finality over fairness. And in these early cases, we had some evidence 
that suggested that these people had been unfairly sentenced, but every court 
said too late. And one of the first cases I ever dealt with where the man was 
executed was a surreal case where, you know, I got that call from the Supreme 
Court denying the last stay motion.

Drove down to be with this man before his scheduled execution and was standing 
back there before he was going to be executed and they, you know, they shave 
the hair off the person's body before they put them in the electric chair. And 
we're standing there - very emotional conversation, holding hands, praying, 
talking. And him saying to me - I remember him saying to me - he said, Bryan, 
it's been such a strange day. When I woke up this morning, the guards came to 
me and said, what do you want for breakfast? And at midday, what do you want 
for lunch? In the evening, they came back and said, what you want for dinner? 
And all day long, he said, they kept saying, what can we do to help you? Can we 
get you stamps to mail your last letters? Can we get you water? Can we get you 
the phone to call your friends and family? And I'll never forget that man 
saying, Bryan, it's been so strange. More people have said, what can I do to 
help you in the last 14 hours of my life than they ever did in the first 19 
years of my life.

And I remember standing there, holding his hands, thinking, yeah, where were 
they when you were 3 years old being abused? Where were they when you were 7 
and you were being sexually assaulted? Where were they when you were a teenager 
and you were homeless and struggling with drug addiction? Where were they when 
you came back from war, suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder?

And with those kinds of questions resonating in my mind, this man was pulled 
away and executed. So it's a really surreal and, I think, deeply destructive 
act to kill a person who's not a threat to other people. But that's our system, 
and that's one of the reasons why getting people closer to that system is one 
of my new priorities.

GROSS: What do you think it meant to him to know that you were there as a 
witness to the execution?

STEVENSON: I think for him and his family, it meant that he was still a human 
being. You know, when I give talks about this issue, I tell people that I don't 
believe that any person is their worst act. I think all of us are more than the 
worst thing we've done. I think if somebody tells a lie, they're not just a 
liar. I think if someone steals something, they're not just a thief. I think 
even if you kill someone, you're not just a killer. And we think we're 
executing killers and that's all they are. And when you surround people who've 
been condemned with some measure of humanity, some measure of dignity, I think 
that changes. And I think for him and his family - but also, I hope for the 
system of justice - it represented something that was important about what 
we're doing to other people.

GROSS: One of the cases that you write about is about one of the children who 
you represented. He was, I think, 13. And he was in prison for having shot his 
mother's boyfriend after he witnessed the mother's boyfriend abusing her, and 
she ended up unconscious and bleeding. And the son wasn't even sure if she was 
alive. She was kind of out cold for about 20 minutes, bleeding profusely. And I 
don't know whose gun it was that the boy used?

STEVENSON: It was the boyfriend - the mother's boyfriend's gun that he had 
hidden away in a dresser drawer.

GROSS: So the boy took the gun, shot and killed the mother's boyfriend. So he's 
in prison. You're trying to represent him. And you go to visit him. He's 
uncommunicative. And he finally just kind of breaks down crying and tells you 
what's been happening to him in prison, which was...

STEVENSON: Yeah, it's one of the real tragedies that we continue to tolerate in 
this country. I went to the jail and there's this little kid. He's 14, and he's 
just tiny and he won't say a word. And after 20 minutes of trying to get them 
to talk to me, I finally went around and got close to him. I said, look, you 
got to talk to me. I can't help you if you don't talk to me. And at one point, 
I leaned on him and I put my arm around him and when I did that, he just 
collapsed into me. And he started crying hysterically and began telling me 
nothing about his mom, nothing about the man, but he started talking to me 
about the jail.

He told me on the first night that he had been there, he'd been hurt by several 
men and then he told me on the next night, he'd been sexually assaulted by 
several people. And then he told me on the night before I'd gotten there, so 
many people had hurt him and sexually assaulted him, he couldn't remember how 
many there had been. You know, and I held that little boy while he cried 
hysterically for almost an hour. And when I left the jail, I couldn't help but 
think, who is responsible for this? And I realized we are. We are a society 
that has allowed our fear and our anger - we've allowed these false narratives 
about children being super predators and other such nonsense - to create 
policies where we are putting children in peril. And I just - I really was 
never the same after that. We got that little boy out of there, and we 
ultimately got a good outcome for him. But it's, again, one of the ways in 
which this disconnect has made us a less fair, less just society.

GROSS: What was the outcome that you got because it's not like he was innocent 
of shooting and killing a man? Doesn't mean he should have been sentenced to 
repeated rape by adult men.

STEVENSON: That's exactly right, you know. And I think this was an act of a 
child, you know? And so what we were able to do was to get him out of the adult 
criminal justice system and back into the juvenile system, which meant that he 
would have a better chance at getting services and treatment and would likely, 
if he demonstrated that he was not a threat to public safety, you know, get out 
sooner than if he had been sentenced to life without parole, which is what 
happens to a lot of children who act just like he did, who commit acts of 
violence in circumstances just like he has. And unfortunately, it's more likely 
that a child like that will be prosecuted as an adult today than it was, you 
know, 40 years ago and that's part of this dishonesty, you know.

We are very clear that children are not like adults when it comes to whether 
they can drink or smoke or vote. In a lot of states, you can't even buy 
firecrackers or get a tattoo until you're 18. And yet, if you commit a criminal 
act, we pretend as if you're just like an adult. And that phenomenon has, I 
think, created tremendous injustice in this country and what we've done to 
children is really unconscionable. That there are 13 and 14-year-old kids who 
have been condemned to die in prison, who are being abused and assaulted 
because of our indifference to child status, is one of the things I'm deeply 
concerned about.

BIANCULLI: Author, professor and attorney Bryan Stevenson speaking to Terry 
Gross last year. We'll hear more of their conversation after a break. This is 
FRESH AIR.

BIANCULLI: This is FRESH AIR. Let's get back to Terry's interview from last 
year with attorney, professor and author Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Equal 
Justice Initiative. His best-selling memoir, "Just Mercy," is now out in 
paperback.

GROSS: The Equal Justice Initiative, which you founded, is based in Alabama and 
represents clients in the South. Have you ever felt that you were discriminated 
against within the legal system yourself as a professional within the legal 
system because you're African-American?

STEVENSON: Oh, sure. I mean, I think - I mean, that happens all the time - and 
not just in the South. Actually with the juvenile cases, with the cases 
involving children, I've been representing kids all over the country. We have 
clients in California, in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, everywhere. And I was in 
a courtroom in the Midwest not too long ago getting ready for a hearing. It was 
my first time there, and I had my suit on. I was sitting at defense counsel's 
table. I wanted to be early and the judge walked out followed by the 
prosecutor. And when the judge saw me sitting at the counsel table, he looked 
at me and he said, hey, hey, hey, you get out of here. I don't want any 
defendant sitting in my courtroom until their lawyers get here. You go back out 
there in the hallway and wait for your lawyer.

And I stood up and I said, oh, I'm sorry your honor. My name is Bryan 
Stevenson. I'm actually the lawyer representing the client today. And the judge 
started laughing and the prosecutor started laughing and I made myself laugh, 
too, because I didn't want to disadvantage my client. And then my client came 
in. He was a young white kid who I was representing. And we did the hearing. 
And I went to my car after that, and I was really just tired. You know, you get 
so burdened down. It's exhausting confronting these presumptions. And I was 
worried about being in front of a judge that was prepared to presume my 
dangerousness, my status - even though I was in a suit - just because of my 
race.

And so, yes, it happens all the time. And it's actually one of the reasons why 
our newest project at EJI, at the Equal Justice Initiative, is really trying to 
change the conversation about race in this country. We've done a very poor job 
of really reflecting on our legacy of racial inequality. And you see it in the 
South, but it's everywhere. And we want to talk more about slavery, and we want 
to talk more about this era between Reconstruction and World War II, which I 
call an era of terrorism, of racial terror and violence that shaped attitudes. 
I want to talk more about the civil rights era - not through the lens of 
celebration. We're too celebratory of civil rights these days. You know, we 
have these 50th anniversaries and everybody's happy and everybody's 
celebrating. Nobody's talking about the hardship.

You know, it's almost as if the civil rights movement was this three-day event. 
On day one, Rosa Parks didn't give up her seat on the bus. On day two, Dr. King 
led a march on Washington. And on the third day, we signed all these laws. And 
if you think about that history in that way, you minimize the trauma, the 
damage, the divides that were created. You can't segregate and humiliate people 
decade after decade without creating long-lasting injuries. And so our newest 
project is really trying to introduce some concept of what transitional justice 
requires - some commitment to truth and reconciliation. You know, at the end of 
the civil rights movement, we didn't tell the truth about what our history had 
done to us. And as a result of that, we haven't reconciled ourselves to that 
history. And that manifests itself in my work every day, for me as an 
African-American professional, but also for my clients, and more importantly 
for the communities my clients are coming from.

GROSS: Your grandmother was the daughter of people who were enslaved in 
Virginia. Did she tell you stories that were passed on to her about slavery?

STEVENSON: Oh, absolutely. Her parents were born into slavery in Bowling Green, 
Va., in the 1840s, and she was born in the 1880s. And because her father 
learned to read as a child and had to keep it secret - you know, his parents 
were terrified that he had figured out how to read. And they wanted him to use 
that skill to help them figure things out when emancipation came. But they were 
terrified of him revealing to anyone he knew how to read. Even after 
emancipation, my grandmother would tell me that he didn't like people to know 
he could read, but he desperately wanted her to learn to read. And that 
orientation was incredibly impactful for me.

You know, my grandmother had a wisdom and a perspective that was shaped by the 
experience of slavery. She had all of these ways of making us cope with a 
world, prepare for a world where there would be these barriers. You know, she'd 
say things like, I'm going to teach you how to grow up on the rough side of the 
mountain because that's what you're going to have to climb if you want to get 
where you're trying to go. And I think that was very definitely shaped by 
slavery and her own experience growing up during terror, during the era of 
lynching and convict leasing and all of these horrific threats that she had to 
navigate until she got to Philadelphia where she raised my mom.

GROSS: Since your grandmother told you stories about how her father was afraid 
to let people know that he could read because he was a slave and then, you 
know, a freed man, did that help instill in you a sense that reading and 
education were actually really important and it was almost, like, subversive to 
be smart?

STEVENSON: Oh, absolutely. My mom, her daughter, was just one of these people 
who believed that, you know, you had to learn to read as early as possible. You 
needed to be surrounded by books. My parents didn't go to college and were 
denied opportunities that I ultimately got. But, you know, my mom went in debt 
to buy World Book Encyclopedia so we could have that in our poor house. And she 
went in debt to buy me Dr. Seuss books because she - as she used to say all the 
time - I love to see you all reading. And that was, you know, very much 
intention in odds with our environment, where most of the adults got on buses 
to go work in the chicken factory, and where there was limited opportunities 
for education. And so, yes, I think that my great-grandfather's learning to 
read and understanding the power of that and my grandmother's respect for him 
was passed on to me.

GROSS: If you're just joining us, my guest is Bryan Stevenson. He's a lawyer 
who represents people on death row, children, the mentally ill. He founded the 
Equal Justice Initiative in Alabama. And he's the author of a new book called 
"Just Mercy," a story of justice and redemption.

You've argued several cases before the Supreme Court. In 2010, you won a case 
regarding life imprisonment without parole when applied to children. Tell us 
what the outcome of this case was.

STEVENSON: Yeah. So the first case was actually about children who had been 
convicted of non-homicides, crimes that did not involve murder - burglary, 
assault, a range of crimes. And there were dozens of children who had been 
condemned to life without parole for those kinds offenses. And so we went to 
the Supreme Court and argued that a life without parole sentence for a child of 
13 or 14 or 16 for a non-homicide was cruel and unusual punishment and the 
court agreed and banned these death in prison sentences for children convicted 
of non-homicides.

My client was a young kid named Joe Sullivan, who was 13, who had been 
sentenced to life without parole in Florida for a crime we don't think he 
actually committed. And he had had a horrific time in prison, again, 
experiencing a lot of sexual assault, developed multiple sclerosis, is now in a 
wheelchair. But it meant that his sentence would be reduced. And we're now very 
hopeful that Joe will be released soon, as have many other people who had been 
condemned to these death-in-prison sentences, including a lot down in 
Louisiana. Louisiana had a large population of children who were sent to 
Angola, the notorious plantation prison in Angola, La. And we've done a lot of 
work there where we've now gotten reduced sentences for dozens of people who 
are sentenced to life without parole.

GROSS: You've been working with people on death row, with the poor, with 
children who have been convicted of crimes, with the mentally ill for years. 
You started this work in the 1980s. Give us an example of something that you 
think has improved in the justice system since that time...

STEVENSON: Sure.

GROSS: ...And something that you think has gotten worse since that time.

STEVENSON: Well, I think recently we've begun to recognize that we cannot 
sustain the level of incarceration that we have created. In the last couple of 
years, the prison population has been stabilizing. The federal prison 
population has decreased recently. And you hear in various states across this 
country a different kind of debate going on about how are we going to reduce 
our prison populations? Maybe we shouldn't just settle for being tough on 
crime. Maybe we need to be smart on crime and right on crime.

We've seen some maturation on the war on drugs. I think most people now 
recognize that we'd do far better in this country if we treated drug dependency 
as a health care problem rather than a criminal justice problem. And I'm very 
encouraged about that. We won these cases at the U.S. Supreme Court - the 2010 
case and then a 2012 case. I went back in 2012 and the court banned mandatory 
life without parole sentences for children. So I think the status of children 
is shifting in hopeful ways.

What's discouraging is the way in which we have continued to tolerate error, 
the way in which we've continued to accept a system where poverty is so 
condemning - you know, our criminal justice system is shaped by wealth, not 
culpability - and the way in which we have made so little progress on race and 
the legacy of racial inequality, that we are still allowing the presumption of 
dangerousness and guilt to kill so many young kids. I mean, the new statistic 
from the Bureau of Justice is really disheartening. The Justice Department is 
now reporting that 1 in 3 black male babies born in the 21st century is 
expected to go to jail or prison. The statistic for Latino boys is 1 in 6. That 
statistic was not true in the 20th century. It was not true in the 19th 
century. And that means we've got enormous work to do to improve our commitment 
to a society that is not haunted and undermined and corrupted by our legacy of 
racial inequality.

GROSS: Bryan Stevenson, thank you so much for talking with us.

STEVENSON: You're very welcome.

BIANCULLI: Bryan Stevenson is the founder of the Equal Justice Initiative and 
author of the memoir "Just Mercy," which has just come out in paperback. He 
spoke last year with Terry Gross. Last April, after persisting appeals by the 
Equal Justice Initiative, Anthony Ray Hinton was freed after 30 years on death 
row, having been exonerated for murders committed in 1985. Joe Sullivan, Bryan 
Stevenson's client who was sentenced to life without parole when he was 13, is 
still in prison, awaiting a hearing before the Florida Supreme Court.

(source: spokanepublicradio.org)