[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide
Rick Halperin
rhalperi at smu.edu
Fri Sep 26 14:56:03 CDT 2014
Sept. 26
UNITED NATIONS:
UN rights office urges stay for defendants in Afghan gang-rape case sentenced
to death
The United Nations human rights office today urged the Government of
Afghanistan to halt the death sentences in a case against a group of men
charged with armed robbery, kidnapping and gang-rape in a province of Kabul.
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) expressed
disappointment that the Afghan Supreme Court affirmed the death sentences given
to 5 of the men, and also sentenced a 6th who had originally been given a
20-year sentence.
"While this is a horrible crime, we have been concerned about the lack of due
process and the failure to comply with national and international fair trial
standards in the proceedings," spokesperson Ravina Shamdasani told reporters in
Geneva.
This decision denies proper justice to both the victims and the accused, she
said, and also undermines efforts to strengthen the rule of law and
administration of justice in the country.
"We urge both Afghanistan's outgoing and incoming Presidents not to implement
the death sentence in this case and refer the case back to courts given the due
process concerns," said Ms. Shamdasani.
The UN rights office also called on the Governments to resume a moratorium on
executions pending full abolition of the death penalty.
In a high-level event yesterday in New York, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and
other senior officials called the continuing application of capital punishment
a "primitive" practice which has no place in the 21st century. They pressed
global leaders to set course towards abolishing the death penalty and advancing
a more progressive judicial agenda in their respective States.
Participating in the meeting, High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad Al
Hussein underscored the need to reform judicial systems around the world,
noting that only then would a practice based on vengeance truly be defeated.
"No judiciary, anywhere in the world, is so robust that it can guarantee that
innocent life will not be taken, and there is an alarming body of evidence to
indicate that even well-functioning legal systems have sentenced to death men
and women who were subsequently proven innocent," he said, calling the
situation "intolerable."
(source: UN News Centre)
JORDAN:
Prince Zeid calls for abolishing death penalty
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Prince Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein urged all
states to put an end to death penalty, which he said is the very example of
human vengeance at its worst.
In remarks at the high-level event, Moving Away from the Death Penalty:
National Leadership, held on the margins of the annual General Assembly debate
in New York, he affirmed that the right to life represents everything the UN
stands for.
His Highness added that the application of the death penalty deprived people of
their lives "arbitrarily and cruelly" and that the practice itself was "unjust
and incompatible with human rights." He underscored the need to reform judicial
systems around the world, noting that only then would a practice based on
vengeance truly be defeated.
"We encouraged the international community to "set course" towards a "more
sophisticated, more human" form of justice which goes beyond punishment and
seeks "a genuine recognition by the wrongdoers of their wrongdoing." The Prince
said.
The High Commissioner dismissed capital punishment as "degrading and cruel in
more than one sense" and acknowledged that it was "often discriminatory" of the
condemned, disproportionately affecting the poor, the mentally ill, the
powerless and minorities.
(source: petra.gov)
CHINA:
Chinese man declared innocent 13 years after death penalty
A man from south China's Guangdong Province was pronounced innocent by a local
court after being sentenced to death for murder 13 years ago, Xinhua reported
Friday.
Xu Hui, a resident of Zhuhai city in Guangdong, was given the death penalty
with a 2-year reprieve for raping and killing a 19-year-old girl by the Zhuhai
Intermediate People's Court in 2001.
Xu repeatedly protested his innocence but all the appeals were rejected by
local courts until the Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) found the suspect's
confession contradicted evidence provided in 2007.
Under the instruction of the SPP, the People's Procuratorate in Guangdong
suggested the Guangdong Provincial Higher People's Court rehear the case in
2008. On Sep 9, the Zhuhai Intermediate People's Court brought in a verdict of
not guilty.
(source: IANS)
INDIA:
SC extends stay on Yaqub Memon's death sentence
The Supreme Court Friday stayed execution of the death sentence of 1993 Mumbai
bomb blast convict Yakub Abdul Razak Memon as it issued notice to Maharashtra
government on his petition seeking an open court hearing of his plea for the
review of the apex court's verdict upholding his death penalty.
Extending the June 2 order suspending his death sentence, a bench of Justice
T.S.Thakur, Justice S.A. Bobde and Justice R. Banumathi in their order said
that the execution of the death sentence will be stayed.
Seeking the revival of his review petition, which was earlier dismissed after
being considered in the chamber by the judges, Memon relied on Sep 2 verdict of
the apex court's constitution bench which had held that a petition seeking the
recall of the apex court's order upholding the death sentence will be heard in
an open court by a bench of 3 judges.
The constitution bench in its Sep 2 order had also said: "It will also apply
where a review petition is already dismissed but the death sentence is not
executed so far. In such cases, the petitioners can apply for the reopening of
their review petition within 1 month from the date of this judgment."
Memon is the 2nd death row convict whose plea for recall of the order upholding
the death sentence is being revived after it was dismissed earlier.
On Sep 12, the court had fixed Oct 29 for an open court hearing of Nithari
serial killer death row convict Surendra Koli's review plea which had also been
dismissed earlier.
The Supreme Court March 21, 2013, had upheld the death sentence awarded to
Memon by the special (now lapsed) TADA (Terrorism and Disruptive Activities
Prevention Act) court and confirmed by the Bombay High Court.
Memon has been described as a mastermind of 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts - a series
of 13 explosions in India's business capital March 12, 1993, which claimed 257
lives and left 713 injured.
President Pranab Mukherjee May 21 rejected Memon's mercy plea. He applied for
presidential pardon in October 2013.
The TADA trial court presided over by Justice P.D. Kode had commenced the trial
Nov 4, 1993, and pronounced its 4,230-page verdict July 31, 2007.
The trial court awarded death sentence to 12 people, including Memon. One of
them subsequently passed away.
The trial court had also sentenced 20 people to life imprisonment and 46
others, including Bollywood star Sanjay Dutt, were given varying terms of
imprisonment.
(source: Free Press Journal)
TUNISIA:
Tunisia rights group calls for abolishing death penalty----Habib Marsit, who
chairs the Tunisian Coalition against the Death Penalty, urged all anti-death
penalty groups to work to abolish it.
A Tunisian human rights group has urged the country's incoming parliament to
abolish capital punishment after a new constitution - endorsed earlier this
year - kept the practice in place.
"All groups that oppose the death penalty will rally to urge the incoming
parliament to abolish it so that we might follow in the footsteps of other
nations that have scrapped the practice, including Djibouti, the 1st Arab
country to do so," Habib Marsit, who chairs the Tunisian Coalition against the
Death Penalty, told Anadolu Agency.
Marsit's remarks were made on the sidelines of a regional conference held in
Tunis under the banner, "Towards the Abolishment of Death Penalty."
The activist lashed out at President Moncef Marzouki and Constituent Assembly
head Mustapha Ben Jafar, saying neither dared raise the issue during the
drafting process of the new constitution, which, Marsit claimed, due to "narrow
political interests."
Since being established in 2007, the coalition has called for scrapping capital
punishment in Tunisia.
(source: World Bulletin)
BAHAMAS:
Lawyer Argues For 15-Year Sentence For Former Death Row Inmat3
The Court of Appeal yesterday reserved its decision on the appeal of a former
death row inmate who wants a 52-year sentence for murder reduced by more than
half.
Murder convict Maxo Tido and his lawyer, Glendon Rolle, appeared before the
appellate court for Tido's substantive hearing to challenge his sentence for
killing 16-year-old Donnell Connover in 2002. Tido's lawyer believes the
sentence is unduly severe.
Yesterday, Mr Rolle argued that his client should have been re-sentenced to 15
years in jail.
However, Justice Stanley John told the convict's lawyer that "15 years is
clearly out of the question".
"The lawyer referred to the case of Quincy Todd, who was released on probation
after a number of years in prison for murder. "Todd had served about 18 years,
didn't he?" Justice Neville Adderley asked. Mr Rolle said yes, adding "and he
was released on probation".
"You want him back into society to make a contribution notwithstanding the
circumstances of the case?" Justice John asked.
Tido's lawyer replied: "We all find ourselves faced with situations that have
consequences, but it does not mean the consequence should mean spending the
rest of his natural life behind bars."
On March 20, 2006, a jury convicted Tido of murdering the victim in 2002. Her
body was found off Cowpen Road, battered and bruised and her skull was crushed.
Evidence also revealed that parts of Connover's body were burned after her
death.
A month after his conviction, then Senior Justice Anita Allen ruled that the
crime committed by Tido warranted the death penalty.
The decision came days after the Privy Council ruled that the mandatory death
sentence in place up to that point in the Bahamas was not constitutional.
In 2009, the Committee for the Prerogative of Mercy decided the law should take
its course, as Tido???s case was not one that warranted mercy.
However, he appealed to the Privy Council, the Bahamas' highest court of
appeal, which ruled that the killing did not warrant execution. Consequently,
he had to reappear before the Supreme Court for re-sentencing.
"This re-sentencing occurred in March 2012 before Senior Justice Jon Isaacs,
who gave Tido 60 years. This was reduced to 52 years considering the time Tido
had spent on remand.
In his submissions yesterday, Mr Rolle also referred to the harsh conditions at
the prison that his client had to endure.
"I am not sure whether it is for the court to take into consideration the
conditions there," Justice John replied.
"The lawyer submitted that his client had a constitutional right to protection
from torture and inhumane treatment, which he endures at the prison.
"Mr Rolle later told the court: "We're seeking 15-20 years because we're saying
that the 60 years would, in effect, be a life sentence which is essentially a
death sentence."
"The lawyer clarified that the new sentence should run from the date of the
appellate court's decision on the matter, which when combined with his client's
more than 10 years on remand, would fall within the 30-60 year range for murder
sentences set out by appellate court in previous decisions.
In response, Crown prosecutor Darell Taylor argued that the case of Quincy Todd
was different because Todd had above-reproach behaviour while incarcerated.
"While rehabilitation is an aspect of sentencing, there are a number of other
factors as well. In this case, there's deterrence," the prosecutor added.
Mr Taylor submitted that Tido could not boast of having good behaviour since
his incarceration as supported by the probation report presented to the court.
The prosecutor asked: "If we were to reintroduce him to society, are we able to
say that he will not break the rules? That he is reformed?"
The judges asked if a psychiatric report had been presented to the judge before
a decision on sentencing had been made.
The prosecutor said no, and submitted that "those are for matters involving the
imposition of the death penalty."
The appellate court said its decision on sentencing will be made at a later
date.
(source: tribune242.com)
More information about the DeathPenalty
mailing list